Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
donaldEpott

Seeming US BB nerf to AP

39 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Testers
1,011 posts
4,573 battles

And all I need to say is look at my signature and you will see the Proof.

 

i have no problems with my ncarolina last match i cit a iowa and a amagi like 16k away .-. and always do 13-20 k dmg to a german per volleys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

Anecdotal evidence. If there was a undocumented nerf to AP. Reddit and the forum would be imploding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
185
[-DPF-]
Members
774 posts
11,104 battles

Not only is your signature not "Proof", it isn't even evidence!  So, you had some bad games and RNG did not go your way.  Join the real world with the rest of us.  I had a much worse day on Monday, but it had nothing to do with a stealth nerf, which didn't happen, and a lot to do with randomness and my not playing up to my usual standard.  Bad days happen.  Get used to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
770
[TXGUN]
[TXGUN]
Members
4,596 posts
13,562 battles

Lol, impossible for you to be doing bad on your own isn't it.

 

Well untill you have had 3K battles in US battleships you dont have room to talk

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
185
[-DPF-]
Members
774 posts
11,104 battles

Playing 5000 games is irrelevant.  You don't learn probability and statistics from playing this game.  Your sample size is so small that it is not even relevant.  If you want to show a nerf.  Get the data from all servers since the patch and show that US BBs have a significant decrease in average damage.  If you want "proof", data mine the new client and show the change in the penetration or damage values. It so happens that there are guys that do this for every patch, and if US BBs had been nerves in this way, the whole forum would be so awash with salt that the Dead Sea would seem like fresh water.  Bad days happen.  Sad but true.:(

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,890
[-K--]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
8,179 posts
10,923 battles

And all I need to say is look at my signature and you will see the Proof.

 

Wow, a sample of ten games! Very convincing indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
770
[TXGUN]
[TXGUN]
Members
4,596 posts
13,562 battles

I for one don't hide my stats and no I dont sit back and snipe US BBs are brawlers or do I need to reshare a few videos to make my case.   https://na.warships.today/player/1000396611/donaldEpott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,940
[ASHIP]
Members
5,454 posts
12,948 battles

 

Well untill you have had 3K battles in US battleships you dont have room to talk

 

 

LOL. Oh you want to be one of those threads today do you? The person with over 14k battles in NA plays very below average, should we defer to him on every issue you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
770
[TXGUN]
[TXGUN]
Members
4,596 posts
13,562 battles

To go from 60 to 90K damage battles to hardly breaking 30K per battle is not just a small hit. Something has changed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
185
[-DPF-]
Members
774 posts
11,104 battles

I for one don't hide my stats and no I dont sit back and snipe US BBs are brawlers or do I need to reshare a few videos to make my case.   https://na.warships.today/player/1000396611/donaldEpott

 

Obviously I don't hide mine either!  That is also not relevant.  Any videos you provide are also not relevant.  I have already indicated how you would need to provide convincing evidence of a nerf.  Providing data from ANY one person will never show a global change to the game.  If they changed US BB AP, they changed it for EVERYONE.  Thus, it would quickly show quite clearly in the overall stats for the ships in question.  You need sample sizes of at least tens of thousands to really show anything, not ten games from one player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
2,029 posts
You don't have anywhere close to 3k battles in US BBs.  Aside from that, Pulicat has done better than you in US BBs despite having far fewer games, so that gives him "room to talk".
Edited by AspiringCodger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,640
[WOLF1]
Members
9,915 posts
18,615 battles

Oh your right after 5K battles I have no idea what I am talking about.

 

but what you are talking about is not true #1, and B, your signature says nothing about AP or its abilities,,,,Not to make fun of your post, but it makes absolute ZERO sense...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

To go from 60 to 90K damage battles to hardly breaking 30K per battle is not just a small hit. Something has changed.

 

Confirmation bias supported by anecdotal evidence does not make for a good argument. If there was a change, we would know. Dataminers have a thing for finding ninja nerfs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
770
[TXGUN]
[TXGUN]
Members
4,596 posts
13,562 battles

Well I for one have not changed how I shoot nor at what I shoot at. I have developed this over time since the start of CBT and yes I have noticed small changes but never this much of a change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
770
[TXGUN]
[TXGUN]
Members
4,596 posts
13,562 battles

You don't have anywhere close to 3k battles in US BBs.  Aside from that, Pulicat has done better than you in US BBs despite having far fewer games, so that gives him "room to talk".

 

CBT 2500 Battles total and 5000 Battles in Open format I assure you I do have 3K battles in US battleships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39,480
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
27,847 posts
27,286 battles

And all I need to say is look at my signature and you will see the Proof.

 

I see no proof, just angsty whining for results over a very, very small sample size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×