Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
DemarticusStone

Why in God's name WG?

33 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
801 posts
2,864 battles

I know I spoke good about WG for the User Music, and that still stands, but REALLY WG?! Re-adding the Saipan?

 

That totally won't break Tier 5-6 Gameplay when they get Tier 7 matches :sceptic:

 

I'm sorry but, I don't care HOW much hate I get for this, that thing is ridiculous, it can carry horribad teams, and not even have to try.

 

Even surrounded by CA's, that thing is almost impervious to Tier 5-6 CA Anti-Air guns.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,106
[ERN]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
10,906 posts
4,896 battles

*me playing in my Saipan* what?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
801 posts
2,864 battles

Is this really a holy matter?

 

Yes, considering I don't like my matches being ruined by something that should be a Special Rewards Ship instead of handing them out all willy-nilly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,849
[AXANR]
Members
3,650 posts
23,502 battles

I knew the new, less-toxic DemarticusStone was too good to last. 

 

Saipan is terrible in the hands of a terrible CV player. It's good in the hands of a good CV player. Not game breaking, not OP. Yes, she gets better planes, but she gets much smaller squadrons. She's only OP if the captain has air supremacy skill. 

Edited by poeticmotion
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,106
[ERN]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
10,906 posts
4,896 battles

 

How is this Toxic? Explain how this is Toxic, because I seriously don't see it.

ranting = toxic.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
801 posts
2,864 battles

I knew the new, less-toxic DemarticusStone was too good to last. 

 

Saipan is terrible in the hands of a terrible CV player. It's good in the hands of a good CV player. Not game breaking, not OP. Yes, she gets better planes, but she gets much smaller squadrons. She's only OP if the captain has air supremacy skill. 

 

...It gets 8 Dive Bombers, Tier 9 Dive Bombers, yeah, not game breaking at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,118
[WOLF1]
Beta Testers
16,681 posts
24,354 battles

hmmm yeah Saipan I need to pick that up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,605
[HINON]
Beta Testers
3,931 posts
8,150 battles

All this thread has done is give further reason for me to get the Saipan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
182
[WHS]
Beta Testers
1,073 posts
14,534 battles

 

...It gets 8 Dive Bombers, Tier 9 Dive Bombers, yeah, not game breaking at all.

 

Ranger gets 12 doesn't it? Why no Ranger rage?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,846
[RLGN]
Members
19,275 posts
35,808 battles

I knew the new, less-toxic DemarticusStone was too good to last. 

 

Saipan is terrible in the hands of a terrible CV player. It's good in the hands of a good CV player. Not game breaking, not OP. Yes, she gets better planes, but she gets much smaller squadrons. She's only OP if the captain has air supremacy skill. 

 

Like I use it with?

 

The ONLY reason I even use my Saipan is I can put an Air Supremacy Captain into it. Doesn't do much for the Strike package, but the extra fighters seem to make a BIG difference with the divebomber package; and it never hurts (except the enemy,) to have an extra 1,000lb bomb to drop.

Ranger gets 12 (divebombers) doesn't it? Why no Ranger rage?

 

Actually, Ranger full Strike is 18 divebombers. 0-1-3, same as Lexington, just 500lb bombs instead of 1,000lb.

 

Really, really a mean setup if the enemy CV driver is clueless about how to deal with it.

 

Edited by Estimated_Prophet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28
[SYJ]
Members
224 posts
9,638 battles

salty much? on a more serious note, I was on the fence about buying the Saipan but now that I see how OP everyone says it is, and how "new" players should not have one, I cant shove $45 in WG face fast enough.

I can use another OP ship:playing:

 

oh and I don't ever play CV's so see you in battle DemarticusStone:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58
[WALLY]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
287 posts
12,389 battles

 

How is this Toxic? Explain how this is Toxic, because I seriously don't see it.

 

 

"The taste of your lips
I'm on a ride
You're toxic I'm slippin' under
With a taste of a poison paradise..."

 

:trollface:

Edited by Unkle_Grimace

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
5,424 posts
3,448 battles

I knew the new, less-toxic DemarticusStone was too good to last.

 

Saipan is terrible in the hands of a terrible CV player. It's good in the hands of a good CV player. Not game breaking, not OP. Yes, she gets better planes, but she gets much smaller squadrons. She's only OP if the captain has air supremacy skill.

 

You can say that about literally any ship in the game. Kagero? Yeah she's OP in the right hands. Nikolai? Yeah she's trash in the hands of a noob. Saipan is OP, and I think it's pretty ridiculous that it's been added to the tech tree. Makes me not even want to bother grinding out a tier 7 CV.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3 posts
3,911 battles

The small squads of the Saipan get shredded by any ship with a moderate amount of AA.  Send both of your torp squads in on any battleship and only 0 -  2 planes make it back to the carrier.

The dive bomber squad takes forever to reload and misses a large portion of its bombs.

The small fighter squads get eaten quickly.  If your running air superiority you run out of fighters fast as it's hanger is small.


 

I would hate for NOOB CV players to buy this ship not because they will become op but because they will become very frustrated with it's high skill cap.


 

Super OP CV.  (not)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16
[VNGNC]
Beta Testers
40 posts
8,871 battles

I know I spoke good about WG for the User Music, and that still stands, but REALLY WG?! Re-adding the Saipan?

 

That totally won't break Tier 5-6 Gameplay when they get Tier 7 matches :sceptic:

 

I'm sorry but, I don't care HOW much hate I get for this, that thing is ridiculous, it can carry horribad teams, and not even have to try.

 

Even surrounded by CA's, that thing is almost impervious to Tier 5-6 CA Anti-Air guns.

I agree with your points..... the CV has tier 9 planes that can be placed into tier 5-6 MM..... most ships if not all can hardly deal with planes from those tiers, other than maybe the  cleveland cruisers...... even tier 7s have a hard time trying to protect themselves from it...... in my opinion the Saipan should be a tier 8 if anything  at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
363
[SDIWO]
Members
1,218 posts
6,659 battles

I knew the new, less-toxic DemarticusStone was too good to last. 

 

Saipan is terrible in the hands of a terrible CV player. It's good in the hands of a good CV player. Not game breaking, not OP. Yes, she gets better planes, but she gets much smaller squadrons. She's only OP if the captain has air supremacy skill. 

 

...It gets 8 Dive Bombers, Tier 9 Dive Bombers, yeah, not game breaking at all.

That take forever to reload. And don't all hit with their bombs. And most of the time you don't get fire damage over time because the just repair it. It's a fun ship, I really really enjoy mine...but I also haven't taken it out from dry dock in a few months since I bought it first go around. If I weren't limited on play time these days I'd totally be taking it out again though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,985
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
2,856 posts
12,319 battles

fyi saipan dive bombers are on its air superiority loadout...and there's only enough replacement planes to replenish the squadron once.

 

Tier 5 and 6 cruiser AA chew through these bombers well enough, I expect to lose half per attack run on any ship that is near an AA cruiser.

 

Thing is, saipan avoids AA ships and focuses the bombers on DDs and BBs with low AA. No different from what USN carriers with AS loadout do. The big difference is the 1k bomb on these dive bombers... which does hurt IF it hits and any ship can avoid most bomb hits by merely being on a full rudder turn when the bombers do the attack (just rudder to full doesnt do it, the ship HAS to be actually turning).

 

Considering this is a whine on the one, single attack squadron this carrier's air superiority loadout can do, its hilarious. He's pissed about a single squadron that can barely hit 8 ships in the whole game (time wise considering flying time and reloading time).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,478
[SYN]
Members
6,156 posts
14,421 battles

I honestly don't see what the big deal is about the Saipan.  Been in countless matches with and against it, and it leaves an impression that is no different from what I'd expect of any other carrier in it's tier spread.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
160
[WAP]
Beta Testers
797 posts
10,513 battles

WG has made it blatantly obvious the only thing they care about is putting their hands in our wallets. Saipan is and always will be the most broken premium ship in the game it is literally the only premium ship I can absolutely say 100% without a doubt is a pay to win ship. Tier 9 planes forced to fight against tier 7 planes talk about giving the special needs cv players the biggest crutch to play on.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×