Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Madwolf05

What line should I try?

81 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

2,852
Alpha Tester
7,170 posts
4,070 battles

With the upcoming dethroning of the USN DDs I just can't stomach continuing up the USN lines at the moment.

 

What should I try that has good, competitive ships throughout, with a good pay off at the end?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
520
[-FBS-]
Members
2,646 posts
4,290 battles

Moskva. 

Edit: It is fairly safe because WG basically said they won't nerf it. 

Edited by saagri

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
267 posts
4,277 battles

try german cruisers or russian DD, both really nice but not easy to play but impactufll if played right ( at tier 9/8 in those lines myself atm)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
7,307 posts
3,304 battles

Depends on your play style. DE BBs are surprisingly good in our meta. People love to snipe, DE BBs are immune to sniping while simultaneously running up to your face and bashing it in.

 

VMF DDs are pretty easy to use and strong but a bit boring with their HE spamming till you get to the Udaloi

 

 

IJN CAs are similar VMF DDs. Spam HE with high accuracy at max range fkr many fires.

 

If you're looking for difficult line but fun, the DE CA line is pretty interesting. They have strengths and weaknesses similar to the USN line while retaining higher win rates, probably thanks to high velocity quick reloading guns

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,153
[WOLF5]
[WOLF5]
Members
6,550 posts
29,921 battles

With the upcoming dethroning of the USN DDs I just can't stomach continuing up the USN lines at the moment.

 

What should I try that has good, competitive ships throughout, with a good pay off at the end?

 

When is this supposed to happen? With the new IJN line?? I doubt very much there will be a "dethroning" (if they ever had a throne). Benson and Fletcher are great ships and will likely remain so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,852
Alpha Tester
7,170 posts
4,070 battles

 

When is this supposed to happen? With the new IJN line?? I doubt very much there will be a "dethroning" (if they ever had a throne). Benson and Fletcher are great ships and will likely remain so.

 

The leaked stats say otherwise. The Tier 8 has 3 more guns and nearly 5k more HP than the Benson.

 

The Tier 9 has 1 more gun, and about 3k more HP than the Fletcher.

 

Both will fire an HE shell that is both flatter arced and completely ignores the armor of the USN DDs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,043
[SALTY]
Members
8,930 posts
18,287 battles

Dethroning US DD's?  Just because 4 ships are added to a tech tree suddenly means the whole USN line is a step down?

 

100% disagreed here.  Your speculation is based off of some unreleased and untested ships at this point.  Kind of being overdramatic, no?

 

US destroyers are still very effective in the right hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,849
[AXANR]
Members
3,650 posts
23,502 battles

 

The leaked stats say otherwise. The Tier 8 has 3 more guns and nearly 5k more HP than the Benson.

 

The Tier 9 has 1 more gun, and about 3k more HP than the Fletcher.

 

Both will fire an HE shell that is both flatter arced and completely ignores the armor of the USN DDs.

We don't know if leaks are accurate. We don't know soft stats. We don't know a lot of things. Too early to scream the sky is falling. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,852
Alpha Tester
7,170 posts
4,070 battles

Sorry guys, I'm not taking chances. There is nothing that leads me to believe this won't be the case, and history backs me up on this.

 

So back on topic, what should I do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,644
[O7]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
12,147 posts
9,111 battles

Cant go wrong with VMF ships although I think talking about the Benson gettind dethroned now is about as needed as people crying about IJN DDs getting ruined with the incoming changes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
520
[-FBS-]
Members
2,646 posts
4,290 battles

Sorry guys, I'm not taking chances. There is nothing that leads me to believe this won't be the case, and history backs me up on this.

 

So back on topic, what should I do?

 

Go Moskva, do an AA build, and post on the forums how Moskva kills planes better than Des Moines. (~8km Range DP guns)

 shot-16.09.06_20.42.37-0650_zpsa8iddbgu.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,852
Alpha Tester
7,170 posts
4,070 battles

Cant go wrong with VMF ships although I think talking about the Benson gettind dethroned now is about as needed as people crying about IJN DDs getting ruined with the incoming changes. 

 

I'm really excited about the IJN DDs. I don't like their current play style at all when I'm using them.

 

All that said though I've just kind of lost hope for the USN line. There is no excitement with them for me anymore. Why roll an Omaha and do 30k damage when I can take my Furutaka and do 80k?

 

I just don't want to be the guy burdening the team by playing ships that just don't stack up overall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,860
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
24,800 posts
3,947 battles

Dethroning USN destroyers by what? Making IJN destroyers worse versions of them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,320 battles

With the upcoming dethroning of the USN DDs I just can't stomach continuing up the USN lines at the moment.

 

What should I try that has good, competitive ships throughout, with a good pay off at the end?

 

4 Top Picks:

 

German Battleships, German cruiser, Russian Destroyers, Russian Cruisers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,852
Alpha Tester
7,170 posts
4,070 battles

Dethroning USN destroyers by what? Making IJN destroyers worse versions of them?

 

From what I can tell they will be better.

 

The IJN DDs will have more guns, flatter arcs, and more HP. That's a recipe for a really nice gun boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,320 battles

This is just hilarious.

 

Bout as hilarious as many of your supposed facts(or lack thereof).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,860
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
24,800 posts
3,947 battles

Akizuki notwithstanding it'll take substantial changes to make IJN destroyers better gunships than USN at the typical USN engagement ranges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,852
Alpha Tester
7,170 posts
4,070 battles

Akizuki notwithstanding it'll take substantial changes to make IJN destroyers better gunships than USN at the typical USN engagement ranges.

 

I would love for you to convince me otherwise. I just don't see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,860
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
24,800 posts
3,947 battles

 

I would love for you to convince me otherwise. I just don't see it.

 

Slow turret traverse, huge turning circles, slow top speed, long reloads, and slow rudders make bad gunfighters at 6km.

 

Akizuki has 2 or 3 of those. Most IJN destroyers have all of those.

Edited by Destroyer_Kiyoshimo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,959 posts
7,738 battles

 

Why is it hilarious?

 

Because according to those leaked stats, new IJN DDs are very bad...Pepsicola level of bad. What you're missing is that flat gun arcs are only beneficial at long(er) ranges, while knife fights are all about turret traverse being able to keep up with the ship's turn and gun reload times. A "Khaba with 33kts speed" is not a very useful contraption, to put it mildly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,852
Alpha Tester
7,170 posts
4,070 battles

 

Slow turret traverse, huge turning circles, and slow rudders make bad gunfighters at 6km.

 

I'm not so convinced. Part of combat is situational awareness. If the guns start out pointing the right way I don't see how the USN DD wins. Not to mention flatter arcs which result in more hits.

 

I feel as if slow turret traverse only hurts when you have bad luck, and I prefer to minimize thise chances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,860
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
24,800 posts
3,947 battles

 

I'm not so convinced. Part of combat is situational awareness. If the guns start out pointing the right way I don't see how the USN DD wins. Not to mention flatter arcs which result in more hits.

 

I feel as if slow turret traverse only hurts when you have bad luck, and I prefer to minimize thise chances.

 

Good luck maneuvering to avoid his torpedoes while keeping your guns on him then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×