28 wileycoyote1984 Beta Testers 27 posts 6,290 battles Report post #1 Posted September 6, 2016 Is anyone else upset with these changes??? I am fine with new ships, they should have created a branch off of the existing ships, but these changes to ships we have been grinding for suck. I have been working hard for the Fubuki and now I have to re-grind for a ship that they are probably going to nerf the hell out of. Nerfing these ships is just removing another hard counter to camping BBs in the game. They already nerfed the hell out of carriers and now they are killing the torp boats. Just call if World of Battleships. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,605 [HINON] Nuk_ Beta Testers 3,931 posts 8,150 battles Report post #2 Posted September 6, 2016 Just call if World of Battleships It already was 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
185 [-DPF-] Nhi_Vanye Members 774 posts 11,104 battles Report post #3 Posted September 6, 2016 (edited) You don't even know what changes they are going to make to the ships, nor do you know that you will have to regrind anything (based upon similar events in the past, that is most unlikely), but you are already pitching a fit. Just relax and wait until you actually have real information. Then, if they screw it up, you can actually make meaningful complaints that might even get some attention from WG. Complaining with no information at all is just silly. Edited September 6, 2016 by Nhi_Vanye Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,640 [WOLF1] pmgaudio Members 9,915 posts 18,507 battles Report post #4 Posted September 6, 2016 You don't even know what changes they are going to make to the ships, nor do you know that you will have to regained anything (based upon similar events in the past, that is most unlikely), but you are already pitching a fit. Just relax and wait until you actually have real information. Then, if they screw it up, you can actually make meaningful complaints that might even get some attention from WG. Complaining with no information at all is just silly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
54 [POINT] SneakHayabusa Beta Testers 384 posts 6,545 battles Report post #5 Posted September 6, 2016 Poll says: No one really cares. Without any information to go on, there's no reason to be upset. I'm quite happy there'll be IJN DD changes/additions. Also a first step to branching tech trees. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
819 [WOLFG] 4bRbyHSSzZ6pk Members 4,300 posts Report post #6 Posted September 6, 2016 Care to share how the changes will affect the actual gameplay of those who play the line to justify being upset? In details if you can please and don't forget to give us a reliable source Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,815 [-KIA-] ValkyrWarframe Members 5,245 posts 16,572 battles Report post #7 Posted September 6, 2016 I will quote atsf from How to Furutaka "...scrubs cannot adapt to changes and cry like a baby thinking it is a downgrade..." 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
219 clowlock Members 1,430 posts 3,437 battles Report post #8 Posted September 6, 2016 I will quote atsf from How to Furutaka "...scrubs cannot adapt to changes and cry like a baby thinking it is a downgrade..." Scrubs can't adapt in general, that's why they fail. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
295 [BONKZ] Amogussy Members 888 posts 11,817 battles Report post #9 Posted September 6, 2016 Historians like it because Akizuki Anime fans like it because Poi Players like it because Mutsuki is down tiered Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
39,443 [HINON] Lert Alpha Tester 27,821 posts 26,880 battles Report post #10 Posted September 6, 2016 More baseless whining. Nothing to see here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,849 [AXANR] poeticmotion Members 3,650 posts 23,502 battles Report post #11 Posted September 6, 2016 LOL. Given that the vote is currently 1 yes 17 no for question 1 and 1 yes 16 no for question 2, I'm guessing this isn't going the way the OP thought it would. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,523 Stauffenberg44 Members 4,335 posts 10,761 battles Report post #12 Posted September 6, 2016 A third question you might have asked: 3) Are you undecided about these changes and waiting for more information as well as in-game experience? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
125 [WOLFB] Geococcyx [WOLFB] Members 375 posts 9,916 battles Report post #13 Posted September 7, 2016 A better question is how has this been done in the past? Some parallel that might give us an idea as to how the developers handle these changes? Even then it is speculative. There are guesses, educated guesses and there is fact - we are pretty much at the first. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2 RenamedUser_1016493851 Members 117 posts 4,447 battles Report post #14 Posted September 7, 2016 You really didn't think this through when you typed this dumb [edited]poll, did you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
484 [SOUP] Atomic_Manatee [SOUP] Members 1,680 posts 7,380 battles Report post #15 Posted September 7, 2016 No on both, but in truth, I would have chosen "Don't Care" for the second one if that choice had been available. Just my .02 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
33 [WOLFA] StringfelowHawke Members 76 posts 36,320 battles Report post #16 Posted September 8, 2016 Here's my thoughts. This is not a nerf. I will never object to any action which steers this game towards historical fidelity. Variety is the spice of life. And this adds that. I'll raise some issues that I DO have with the new lines in another thread. Until it happens, though, I'm excited with anticipation and only hope I won't be let down when the details finally emerge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
69 [EF21] Rusty_Bucket__ Members 676 posts 47,683 battles Report post #17 Posted September 8, 2016 When is this change supposed to take place? I've looked around and can't seem to locate that bit of info. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites