Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
BITCOIN_TO_100K_BY_2021

Best Secondary builds per BB tier?

15 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Testers
249 posts
10,628 battles

I am very very fond of secondary builds. There is a certain satisfaction in seeing a curtain of lead raining down on those sneaky reds who tried to get too close to you. And I know that I am not the only one.

 

What are the Battleships, in your opinion, that are best secondary build ships in each of their classes?

 

My list is, 

 

Tier II - Mikasa - IJN (duhh)

Tier III - Nassau - German (hands down)

Tier IV - Kaiser - German

Tier V -  Konig - German

Tier VI - Used to be Warspite, but now Bayern has taken it's place

Tier VII - Nagato - IJN

Tier VIII - Bismark (no competition)

Tier IX - Izumo (IJN)

Tier X - Yamato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
825
[ARMDA]
Members
9,004 posts
6,779 battles

You gave me no choice, all of them secondaries are glorious

 

 

although Bismarck HAS to be first, with 10km range on secondaries

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
249 posts
10,628 battles

You gave me no choice, all of them secondaries are glorious

 

 

although Bismarck HAS to be first, with 10km range on secondaries

 

So you would rate tier VIII Bismark over Tier X Yamato? Brave choice. Very brave!
Edited by gayang3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
825
[ARMDA]
Members
9,004 posts
6,779 battles

It's actually pretty good for ITS tier, but for Tier 10 I would have to say Yamato~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,471
[SWFSH]
[SWFSH]
Volunteer Moderator
2,629 posts
7,415 battles

  • Mikasa.

    • With only two main guns you're going to need it.
    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.

  • Nassau. 

    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.

  • Kaiser.

    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.

  • Konig.

    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.

  • Bayern.

    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.

  • Scharnhorst/Gneisenau.

    • HE secondaries are better than the Nagato's AP secondaries.
    • Nagato lacks the armour for close-quarters brawling, which is required for effective secondary use.
    • Colorado is too slow to make use of secondaries most of the time.
    • Scharn and Gneisenau also get torpedoes for close range brawling.

  • Bismarck.

    • Combine it with hydro and you've got a monster cap contester.
    • Throw on manual secondaries and watch as DDs squeal in fright as you charge their smoke with hydro active, secondaries blasting away.

  • Izumo

    • Good luck using secondary builds at this tier.

  • Yamato

    • Good luck using secondary builds at this tier..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
249 posts
10,628 battles

  • Mikasa.
    • With only two main guns you're going to need it.
    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.
  • Nassau. 
    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.
  • Kaiser.
    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.
  • Konig.
    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.
  • Bayern.
    • Secondary builds are nothing special at this tier.
  • Scharnhorst/Gneisenau.
    • HE secondaries are better than the Nagato's AP secondaries.
    • Colorado is too slow to make use of secondaries most of the time.
    • Scharn and Gneisenau also get torpedoes for close range brawling.
  • Bismarck.
    • Combine it with hydro and you've got a monster cap contester.
    • Throw on manual secondaries and watch as DDs squeal in fright as you charge their smoke with hydro active, secondaries blasting away.
  • Izumo
    • Good luck using secondary builds at this tier.
  • Yamato
    • Good luck using secondary builds at this tier..

 

Interesting take.

 

I'd say Bayern is where secondaries start making sense as a strategy unto thy self. I've had quite a few games where I did more than 10K secondary damage. And with knifing between two enemies and seeing the secondaries shoot from both sides is one of the most satisfying feelings. Can't wait to get the Bismarck.

 

Have to disagree with your comment about Izumo/Yamato. At those stages you already have so much main gun firepower that concentrating your modules/captains skills on secondaries and getting a bit close is definitely a viable strategy.

 

 

 

Edited by gayang3
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,229 posts
7,820 battles

 

So you would rate tier VIII Bismark over Tier X Yamato? Brave choice. Very brave!

 

Given the things those 10km secondaries will be shooting at, yes, Bismarck is better than Yamato in terms of her secondary power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
729
Alpha Tester
2,162 posts
6,770 battles

Having played the Yamato with the secondary build, it is very useful at t10. If you know what you're doing it gives you heavy area control as well as a bonus in brawls. Fires will boost your damage as well from the 2ndaries. All in all you get on average a 10% damage boost. 

 

I feel this will be the same for the Biz and I didn't have manual on the Izumo but its 2nds are the same as Yamato's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17,926
[WOLF5]
Members
39,240 posts
31,549 battles

German BBs have the best secondary builds in general.  They've even supplanted Nagato at Tier VII for Secondaries.  The only one that still has a, "You better not forget about me, you b!tches" is Yamato.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,080
Alpha Tester
6,683 posts
3,338 battles

Have you people forgotten that the Tirpitz is a better man-fighter than the Bismarck because of its torpedoes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,001
[4HIM]
[4HIM]
Beta Testers
2,291 posts
20,576 battles

Secondary build in Izumo and Yamato pay big dividends.  I have killed a decent amount of DDs w Izumo A hull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
249 posts
10,628 battles

Secondary build in Izumo and Yamato pay big dividends.  I have killed a decent amount of DDs w Izumo A hull.

 

I don't get how the Izumo secondaries get worse when it goes form A hull to B. Aren't things supposed to get better when you upgrade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
2,589 posts
8,799 battles

I'd rate Kürfurst over Yamato for secondaries, they seem to do more damage (I have both, both are secondary build... And Montana too. Which is surprisingly no slouch either with a secondary build.). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
2,589 posts
8,799 battles

 

I don't get how the Izumo secondaries get worse when it goes form A hull to B. Aren't things supposed to get better when you upgrade?

 

You lose some 155mm turrets and gain a bunch of 127mm turrets. That's probably why the rating goes down (even though the smaller guns are better because they shoot HE) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17,926
[WOLF5]
Members
39,240 posts
31,549 battles

Have you people forgotten that the Tirpitz is a better man-fighter than the Bismarck because of its torpedoes?

 

Ah, this thread though is on Secondaries.  Tirpitz has good secondaries but Bismarck's is better for the massive advantage in range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×