Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
JojoTheMongol

Even the Mighty Arizona Couldn't save this team

13 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
1,112 posts
1,111 battles

Like seriously, I couldn't carry any harder... 

 

larKlmc.jpg

 

 

 

 MDdrYGb.jpg

 

 

 GYZyKRE.jpg

 

 

I'm not even mad. It was almost impressive that my team managed to lose this one. 

Edited by JojoTheMongol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Guest
0 posts

While its very saddening to see a team lose even after you try your best to make sure the Team has a chance to win, its always best to avoid naming and shaming, since its against the rules, at the very least,  you could have covered the names. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
534
[VPMN]
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
2,095 posts
8,175 battles

How is it naming and shaming, he didn't point out that his team was terrible, just that he got more kills and did all the heavy lifting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,694
[FOXEH]
Alpha Tester
6,887 posts
22,746 battles

Someone is in need of a back brace I can Imagine right now!:teethhappy:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27
[GSG]
Members
215 posts
3,457 battles

Just a quick question on naming and shaming, if you are showing the names of people who did an awesome job or you had an awesome team and the enemy was also an awesome team, would it really be naming and shaming?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
534
[VPMN]
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
2,095 posts
8,175 battles

Just a quick question on naming and shaming, if you are showing the names of people who did an awesome job or you had an awesome team and the enemy was also an awesome team, would it really be naming and shaming?

 

I personally don't see it as N&S, in fact I saw nothing wrong with the OP original post. However the only people that can truly answer your question are WG mods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
619
[-GPS-]
Members
2,955 posts
46,807 battles

Just a quick question on naming and shaming, if you are showing the names of people who did an awesome job or you had an awesome team and the enemy was also an awesome team, would it really be naming and shaming?

 

IMHO no it wouldn't. Even this match it looks like it may have been fairly close. The Arizona certainly carried hard and had a great battle, but you usually don't stay afloat long enough to get even 3 or 4 kills without someone else helping out. The only time I got 7 involved several pretty decent teammates who kept the enemy busy long enough for Isokaze to do the work. Thankfully that was a win, and I completely understand the OP's frustration. 

 

The policy here, however, seems like it discourages posting names at all because someone always is last on the team list with the lowest score. 

 

Joke:  what do you call the person who graduated at the bottom of their class at medical school?  Doctor. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
249 posts

You only shot down 1 aircraft and you are proud of that?  Just kidding.  Carry on.  good game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
93
[WOLF2]
Members
471 posts
12,779 battles

Is there some new ability on the Arizona I don't know about?

 

How did he get the "Caused Flooding" ribbon?

 

NVM: apparently from ramming but did zero damage.

Edited by khan1670

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,112 posts
1,111 battles

You only shot down 1 aircraft and you are proud of that?  Just kidding.  Carry on.  good game. 

 

Hey, no one said Arizona had good AA. :teethhappy: I actually think that was a scout plane too, or maybe a fighter. For some reason the enemy CV ignored me while I ripped through 5 enemy ships that were capping our base. Probably should have taken me out instead of the Atlanta trying to help me. Our western flank completely fell apart and died without inflicting much in terms of casualties. An Atlanta and I were the only ones who went back to the cap to defend it. He didn't last long, but he did do a good job of distracting. RNG Jesus has blessed me. I was citadeling cruisers left and right.

 

Is there some new ability on the Arizona I don't know about?

 

How did he get the "Caused Flooding" ribbon?

 

NVM: apparently from ramming but did zero damage.

 

 

The Texas actually rammed me to kill me. I was distracted by the other ships that I didn't realize he was just going for a ram until it was too late. I think he thought I have no chance dueling this guy who just blasted 5 cruisers in 3 minutes. Had I dodged his ram I likely would have killed him since he was below 10k hitpoints and I had around 20k. Maybe we would have won. Not sure.

Edited by JojoTheMongol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×