904 [CLOVR] teamoldmill Beta Testers 3,667 posts 1,637 battles Report post #1 Posted August 5, 2016 (edited) https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfWarships/comments/4w8c58/so_about_gro%C3%9Fer_kurf%C3%BCrst/ Not looking good for German high tier...... is this true, 25% torpedo protection? Everyone who has faced it seems to be walking away with the same impression, crappy ship. No survivability whatsoever and nothing to compensate for the lack of. Edited August 5, 2016 by teamoldmill Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,148 [NDA] kerensky914 Supertester 3,926 posts 2,863 battles Report post #2 Posted August 5, 2016 Chances of me ever getting to Tier X are so remote that I find it hard to care. ;) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,064 [-K--] Spyde Beta Testers 4,890 posts 15,173 battles Report post #3 Posted August 5, 2016 They needed a Ship to get people from complaining about the Montana buuut... Stats aren't final. Supertester's have been doing a good job so lets hope they give this ship a good run. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
386 [O7] Zampy Beta Testers 1,804 posts 12,331 battles Report post #4 Posted August 5, 2016 Only run into the TX once. It was more maneuverable than I thought it would be, but damn did everyone focus it down. It was one of the first ships sunk. It took 15% of its HP in damage from the first salvo of the game while still pointed towards my team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
39,481 [HINON] Lert Alpha Tester 27,858 posts 27,302 battles Report post #5 Posted August 5, 2016 Supertester's have been doing a good job so lets hope they give this ship a good run. One thing to keep in mind is that all we do is give feedback. It's up to WG what they do with that feedback. We don't have a direct influence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,228 [-AFK-] 10T0nHammer Members 7,321 posts 3,856 battles Report post #6 Posted August 5, 2016 Only run into the TX once. It was more maneuverable than I thought it would be, but damn did everyone focus it down. It was one of the first ships sunk. It took 15% of its HP in damage from the first salvo of the game while still pointed towards my team. The bad part of being a ST, the amount of aggro you have painted on your back is crazy. I've seen people go out of their way to target STs simply because they can lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,064 [-K--] Spyde Beta Testers 4,890 posts 15,173 battles Report post #7 Posted August 5, 2016 (edited) One thing to keep in mind is that all we do is give feedback. It's up to WG what they do with that feedback. We don't have a direct influence. At least its feedback that WG has a better chance of listening to on ship balance. It took how long to get the Montana Buffed ? after being a CBT Test Tree. I've been happy with the German/Russian Cruiser tree.. along with the Russian DD tree. So at least something has been going good. basically the post CBT release tree's have been pretty good. Edited August 5, 2016 by Spyde Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,616 [-K-] Edgecase [-K-] Members 6,122 posts 29,433 battles Report post #8 Posted August 5, 2016 (edited) Bummer about that hydro and rudder shift not making up for being a huge target with bad torpedo protection. If true. Edit: Also, what's the accepted way to spell that ship's name on a US English keyboard? The glyph is closest to a "B", but the pronunciation is closest to "ss". Edited August 5, 2016 by Edgecase 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
139 cmdr_raccoon Members 821 posts Report post #9 Posted August 5, 2016 Yeah i did read that info from some sites and such. Its the reason that i already set my aim to stop my grind of that line up to tier 9 at most when it comes out. Sad that I had hopes this line would be the one id get my first t10. Aside from good guns everything seems meh. (And i thought good guns on mediocre hulls are usually russian cruiser thing ) But i usually dont bother saying much on it because theres enough ppl who like to accuse wehraboo and what not if arguing abt german ships appearing subpar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
644 [APOC] DasBootcamp Members 1,982 posts 8,035 battles Report post #10 Posted August 5, 2016 Chances of me ever getting to Tier X are so remote that I find it hard to care. ;) But to the people who have been anticipating this line and do care, it sucks from everything I have read. It is bigger than the Montana with less HP, horrible torp protection, AA has range but no damage, turns worse than the Titanic, and has Montana AP Alpha damage. My faith in the supertester/wg relationship is a bit shaky after the Krispy Kreme. How that thing made it into the game is beyond me lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
904 [CLOVR] teamoldmill Beta Testers 3,667 posts 1,637 battles Report post #11 Posted August 5, 2016 They needed a Ship to get people from complaining about the Montana buuut... Stats aren't final. Supertester's have been doing a good job so lets hope they give this ship a good run. I hope so, but goodness it looks bad right now. I know the size discrepancy was overblown, but it is still a huge ship with a terrible turning radius, no torpedo defenses and mediocre guns at best. If they don't give it real protection, including something to help with HE and fires, it just cannot work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
697 Brofisticus Beta Testers 2,196 posts Report post #12 Posted August 5, 2016 Supertester's have been doing a good job Citation needed. Seriously, I know of two current super testers that are worth the title and I doubt their opinions are being heard. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
904 [CLOVR] teamoldmill Beta Testers 3,667 posts 1,637 battles Report post #13 Posted August 5, 2016 One thing to keep in mind is that all we do is give feedback. It's up to WG what they do with that feedback. We don't have a direct influence. This is the thing, I know you guys kick butt, but ya, ultimately it is WG's call, and we on this server are not a priority and we play differently than the RU folks. Keep up the good work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
266 [MWM] Skraeling Alpha Tester 1,819 posts 6,434 battles Report post #14 Posted August 5, 2016 Citation needed. Seriously, I know of two current super testers that are worth the title and I doubt their opinions are being heard. beg your pardon? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
327 [MELON] Raffgard Alpha Tester 357 posts 4,946 battles Report post #15 Posted August 5, 2016 The bad part of being a ST, the amount of aggro you have painted on your back is crazy. I've seen people go out of their way to target STs simply because they can lol This. I don't know how many matches where I am focused fired because I am in a German BB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
39,481 [HINON] Lert Alpha Tester 27,858 posts 27,302 battles Report post #16 Posted August 5, 2016 Also, what's the accepted way to spell that ship's name on a US English keyboard? The accepted rule is that if you don't have a ß readily available, you use 'ss'. Similar, if your keyboard doesn't have a ü, you type 'ue'. So the name of the ship would be spelled 'Grosser Kurfuerst' on a standard US keyboard. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,596 [-KIA-] TenguBlade Banned 9,382 posts 29,074 battles Report post #17 Posted August 5, 2016 (edited) Well, there's one positive note about this. The community nickname for the 16.5" guns seems to be rather dead-set on "blaze-it rifles". Only run into the TX once. It was more maneuverable than I thought it would be, but damn did everyone focus it down. It was one of the first ships sunk. It took 15% of its HP in damage from the first salvo of the game while still pointed towards my team. Yep. Every ST I see gets focused to hell. I personally avoid going out of my way to sink them: after all, they are the closest thing to a community say in balancing the game. Bad data means bad balance. Nobody else seems to care though. Edited August 5, 2016 by TenguBlade Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
123 [AK] Seloth Beta Testers 482 posts 17,247 battles Report post #18 Posted August 5, 2016 Bummer about that hydro and rudder shift not making up for being a huge target with bad torpedo protection. If true. Edit: Also, what's the accepted way to spell that ship's name on a US English keyboard? The glyph is closest to a "B", but the pronunciation is closest to "ss". hold down the alt key and type 0223 to get a ß Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
139 cmdr_raccoon Members 821 posts Report post #19 Posted August 5, 2016 (edited) I'm interested in knowing what's the given rationale for giving this ship what seems to be very poor survivability. What 'balance' factor makes this acceptable? Edited August 5, 2016 by cmdr_raccoon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
572 [O7] Kevik70 [O7] Beta Testers 1,654 posts 10,699 battles Report post #20 Posted August 5, 2016 The bad part of being a ST, the amount of aggro you have painted on your back is crazy. I've seen people go out of their way to target STs simply because they can lol Last night I watch a top tier DD charge out to point blank range to launch torps at a Dunkerque class battleship. DD died, BB didn't at least not to the destroyer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,064 [-K--] Spyde Beta Testers 4,890 posts 15,173 battles Report post #21 Posted August 5, 2016 This. I don't know how many matches where I am focused fired because I am in a German BB. I target them to see how well they take damage. I assume everyone else does the same. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
421 [ANKER] danredda1616 Supertester, In AlfaTesters 1,115 posts 7,282 battles Report post #22 Posted August 5, 2016 My faith in the supertester/wg relationship is a bit shaky after the Krispy Kreme. How that thing made it into the game is beyond me lol. Just going to answer this by casually quoting something else One thing to keep in mind is that all we do is give feedback. It's up to WG what they do with that feedback. We don't have a direct influence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
904 [CLOVR] teamoldmill Beta Testers 3,667 posts 1,637 battles Report post #23 Posted August 5, 2016 I'm interested in knowing what's the given rationale for giving this ship what seems to be very poor survivability. What 'balance' factor makes this acceptable? This is what is throwing me. They were touted as survivability being their forte. Yet we have a T10 with the least hit points, torp protection, huge size, terrible turning circle and armor that from all reports is great at citadel protection, but has the flaw of lots of 33%. I have said a million times HE and fires don't care about armor, only how easy the ship is to hit. Field day on this sucker and a carrier's wet dream. 1000 foot sluggish monster with no torpedo protection and a deck the size of a small city....... yummy. Top it all off with herp derp guns. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
697 Brofisticus Beta Testers 2,196 posts Report post #24 Posted August 5, 2016 beg your pardon? Pardon denied. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,616 [-K-] Edgecase [-K-] Members 6,122 posts 29,433 battles Report post #25 Posted August 5, 2016 hold down the alt key and type 0223 to get a ß The accepted rule is that if you don't have a ß readily available, you use 'ss'. Similar, if your keyboard doesn't have a ü, you type 'ue'. So the name of the ship would be spelled 'Grosser Kurfuerst' on a standard US keyboard. Thanks, that's what I thought, but figured I'd double-check. I'll have to go with "ss", as alt-0223 only works when I have a full-size keyboard available (i.e., not laptop), since the 0223 needs to be typed on the numpad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites