Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
_Legal_Legend_

Interest in Individual Tournament Play

30 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

11
[OVRPN]
Members
87 posts
13,526 battles

Who would be interested in taking part in a tournament consisting of individual performances in random matches?

 

Tournament would be double elimination format were the captains competes in a per-assigned tier and type against the general population in a random battle. The individual captains would be scored based on a points calculation from the post battle detailed report. Captain with highest total score would move to next round and with double elimination 1st to 4th place can be determined.

 

To verify scoring the captains would division up with a judge to oversee the scoring.

 

I have utilized this format in other WG products with success and I feel confident it can be tailored to the WoWs world. 

 

 

Edited by Legal_Legend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,114
[FOXEH]
Banned
14,364 posts
23,364 battles

Velly Intallesting, tell me more mine Herr...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
649
[D6]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
4,051 posts

Get the training rooms. Screw the MM and random [edited].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[OVRPN]
Members
87 posts
13,526 battles

I guess tho since I'm a huge noob (no joke) I will loose but maybe.

You never know, RNG may favor you:)

 Then again maybe not :trollface:

Velly Intallesting, tell me more mine Herr...

Ideally, The score would be a point system based on the different parts of the detailed report. i.e. most damage from guns, torps, the number of hits so on so on

Do I get to sink things and win stuff?  If so I'm all ears  :izmena:

As it stands right now I am floating the idea of a tournament to see how many fish surface. Maybe a WG or a big time YouTube'r will front some prizes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[OVRPN]
Members
87 posts
13,526 battles

Get the training rooms. Screw the MM and random [edited].

 

But with out changing files this is not a readily accessible option. What I propose can been done right now without the participates having to do anything other then perform.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,038
[BONKS]
Members
1,738 posts
20,733 battles

As it stands right now I am floating the idea of a tournament to see how many fish surface. Maybe a WG or a big time YouTube'r will front some prizes

 

Good luck with that... The last big promoted tournament WG offered to payout over 130k gold, well they never paid the tournament winners anything lol. It's just better to not get WG involved...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[OVRPN]
Members
87 posts
13,526 battles

 

Good luck with that... The last big promoted tournament WG offered to payout over 130k gold, well they never paid the tournament winners anything lol. It's just better to not get WG involved..

 

Not looking for anything from anyone, I can fund it myself. It is just too bad every response is negative for the Super and Beta Tester. Really makes me feel like this game has a future.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52,539
[MAUS]
Members
13,795 posts

You can understand some players being cautious -- some of those here have had long relationships with Wargaming.  Some have been largely positive.  Some have been ... "colourful" seems like a nice way of putting it.  I would like to hear more on how you forsee judging this.  How many games would people play?  How would assigning a coordinator to witness the game work?  What would the coordinator be expected to do during said game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
71
[ANZ4C]
Alpha Tester
325 posts
9,703 battles

You can understand some players being cautious -- some of those here have had long relationships with Wargaming.  Some have been largely positive.  Some have been ... "colourful" seems like a nice way of putting it.  I would like to hear more on how you forsee judging this.  How many games would people play?  How would assigning a coordinator to witness the game work?  What would the coordinator be expected to do during said game?

Just my 2cents.

 

I ran tournaments without a referee watching, with the requirement that both parties submit screenshots of the results. In this case I would suggest people have to submit replays as well as screenshots. That way the judge can perform audits, say 10% of games submitted get audited? Unless the replays have fast forward options? (not used WoWS replay, in favour of my ShadowPlay software)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[OVRPN]
Members
87 posts
13,526 battles

You can understand some players being cautious -- some of those here have had long relationships with Wargaming.  Some have been largely positive.  Some have been ... "colourful" seems like a nice way of putting it.  I would like to hear more on how you forsee judging this.  How many games would people play?  How would assigning a coordinator to witness the game work?  What would the coordinator be expected to do during said game?

 

I would start with a small tournament, say 10-20 player in tier 8 ships. The type of boats would have to be the same for each contestant and each round.

 

Judging would be based on the results of the detailed battle results from each contestant. An example would be the highest overall damage get 1 point, number of MB hits for 1 pt., and Damage from MB for 1 pt. every category could be used for points. The more categories the contestant wins the more points, A tie breaker could be the number of modules damages. The scoring is flexible enough to just be 3 categories or all of them.

 

The number of games/battles played could be 1 per round or a best of series for a very competitive tournament. The tournament could be single elimination or consolation style.

 

A coordinator/judge would run a division with each contestant and the contestant would need to do nominal damage to witness (i.e. mild ramming so it shows on detailed battle results). It unfortunate we could just not trust contestants to submit honest results.

 

The coordinator/witness would go able playing the battle to the best of their ability as expected in a division.

 

I have created scorecards and editable brackets for other WG products (Blitz) that could be configured for WoWs. I would like to start a very small tournament of 6-10 players as a test run. We can stream the battles on Twitch or post replays on YouTube.

 

BTW I stream http://www.twitch.tv/ikener

 

Edited by Legal_Legend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[OVRPN]
Members
87 posts
13,526 battles

Update, The tournament format, scoring and reporting mechanism has been refined. :coin:

I currently have a simple and robust working model that can be run buy anyone interested. The only task a participant must do is understand how to take a screen shot and how to post them on a forum thread.  :hmm:

 

If you or your clan is interested in a tournament please contact me for more information. :red_button:

Edited by Legal_Legend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1
[RQL]
Beta Testers
50 posts
15,673 battles

 

Good luck with that... The last big promoted tournament WG offered to payout over 130k gold, well they never paid the tournament winners anything lol. It's just better to not get WG involved...

 

Legal,

 

You can use our TF16 TeamSpeak for this tournament, I will contribute or by one premium.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12
[DBPS]
Members
210 posts
8,275 battles

I've seen first hand how this works and it is a rather well thought out tournament scheme. I'll participate in any way I can... count on me.

 

"I am Kahbrohn... and I endorse this message!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[OVRPN]
Members
87 posts
13,526 battles

 

Legal,

 

You can use our TF16 TeamSpeak for this tournament, I will contribute or by one premium.

Thanks crux I appreciate your willingness to help. 

 

 

I've seen first hand how this works and it is a rather well thought out tournament scheme. I'll participate in any way I can... count on me.

 

"I am Kahbrohn... and I endorse this message!"

Thanks for the endorsement, one (1) warchest on it's way

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
99 posts
5,144 battles

Really, What is the worst that could happen? (don't answer that) you play a mini tourney and have some fun and meet some new friends? (let us assume we are not being negative) who knows this could end up being a ton of fun?  this sounds like a great idea with lots of potential, but i do agree to the caution with involving WG just making sure you are not breaking any EULA though.  Great idea though!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15
[TF16A]
Members
105 posts
7,496 battles

I think this is a great idea and I'm fully behind it. We would have to work out logistics but a good start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[OVRPN]
Members
87 posts
13,526 battles

Really, What is the worst that could happen? (don't answer that) you play a mini tourney and have some fun and meet some new friends? (let us assume we are not being negative) who knows this could end up being a ton of fun?  this sounds like a great idea with lots of potential, but i do agree to the caution with involving WG just making sure you are not breaking any EULA though.  Great idea though!

Not answering first question. (per your direction) skipping questions 2 & 3. I will contact WG to get clarification on our tournament format and reward structure.

 

I think this is a great idea and I'm fully behind it. We would have to work out logistics but a good start.

Your support is appreciated (Warchest on its way)and since you won the test tournament you get a automatic #1 seeding in the next tournament.

:popcorn::popcorn::popcorn:

Are you trolling me??? Do I need to put a bounty on your ships?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
83
[TF16A]
[TF16A]
Members
506 posts
11,528 battles

While I didn't participate in the test tournament, am looking forward to participating in the next iteration of this tournament as from what I've heard from the participants indicated that the test tournament was well run and as fair as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
492
[RM-I]
[RM-I]
Members
981 posts
13,303 battles

Plus, this adds that much more content to World of Warships. On a side note, I have known legal_legend for a minute now, he is really good at putting together fun tournaments and bringing people together. 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[OVRPN]
Members
87 posts
13,526 battles

Plus, this adds that much more content to World of Warships. On a side note, I have known legal_legend for a minute now, he is really good at putting together fun tournaments and bringing people together. 

 

 

Thank you good sir..... The minutes have been fun for sure.:medal:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×