Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Skyfaller

FIX THE MOGAMI ALREADY

71 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,985
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
2,856 posts
12,319 battles

Un-Nerf the turret rotation rate.

 

As it is Mogami belongs in tier 6. The guns even with turret rotation rate capt skill and ship upgrade CANNOT keep up with the ship on 1pnt of rudder. This is a mentally deficient gameplay decision.

 

 

FIX THIS THING ALREADY WG.

 

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
11,964 posts
6,273 battles

You could always use the 203s, since you're stuck with them on the Ibuki anyway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
7,130 posts
7,331 battles

It's already borderline OP.

 

Stop whining, use the 203s or get good.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

Use the 203s. They are and have always been quite good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
10,919 posts
4,873 battles

It's already borderline OP.

 

Stop whining, use the 203s or get good.

 

I'd agree with pre-nerf Mogami being borderline OP, but I don't see how that applies to the current Mogami.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,662
[CALM]
Beta Testers
6,838 posts
6,088 battles

You're going to have to wait until WG gets around to line splits.  Then Mogami will likely get her 155s unnerfed; at least in CL format, if not in both CL and CA format.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
7,130 posts
7,331 battles

 

I'd agree with pre-nerf Mogami being borderline OP, but I don't see how that applies to the current Mogami.

 

Because it is the second best T8 Line Cruiser in the game. And the first best is OP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,320 battles

It's already borderline OP.

 

Stop whining, use the 203s or get good.

What if you're stuck with 155s due to stock?

Use the 203s. They are and have always been quite good.

Read above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
7,130 posts
7,331 battles

What if you're stuck with 155s due to stock?

Read above.

 

And we should care about how bad ships are stock.....why?

 

Stock ships suck, fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
7,307 posts
3,329 battles

I still use the 155s, average more damage than the NO. Whats the problem again?

 

Now it REQUIRES planning instead of being an OP Kutuzov (hehe). You have to think ahead and plan engagements in advance. Her slow rotation has actually benefited my battleship play greatly.

Edited by 10T0nHammer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
5,424 posts
3,448 battles

I never really understood peoples argument against un-nerfing the turret rotation, claiming it would be "too OP". The main reason the 155s were nerfed was because of their ability to use BFT/AFT, giving them outrageously good range and DPM. Their ability to turn was never the problem.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

What if you're stuck with 155s due to stock?

Read above.

 

Then there's some grinsing to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,320 battles

 

Then stop complaining until you've upgraded.  All ships suck stock.

 

Yes there are sucky stock ships but good god, light caliber guns that have the turret traverse of the warspite? Really?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
5,424 posts
3,448 battles

I still use the 155s, average more damage than the NO. Whats the problem again?

 

Now it REQUIRES planning instead of being an OP Kutuzov (hehe). You have to think ahead and plan engagements in advance. Her slow rotation has actually benefited my battleship play greatly.

 

The "I do well in it therefore it is good" argument has been debunked many times. I did well in with 155s personally, but honestly it felt like a handicapped ship. Zero ability to turn and fire whatsoever, I didn't even feel like I was truly playing the Japanese tier 8 cruiser until I started using the 203s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,501
[GWG]
[GWG]
Alpha Tester
29,314 posts
15,806 battles

They want you to use the 8" guns. I have said this before but the Mogami is a ship that belongs in to separate tiers. The Scharnhorst if they allow it to have the planned 15" guns is another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,662
[CALM]
Beta Testers
6,838 posts
6,088 battles

I never really understood peoples argument against un-nerfing the turret rotation, claiming it would be "too OP". The main reason the 155s were nerfed was because of their ability to use BFT/AFT, giving them outrageously good range and DPM. Their ability to turn was never the problem.

 

Because the 155s also had a buffed RoF even without AFT, which is the main issue.

 

If they gave it the historical traverse but also the historical RoF limitation, the 155s would be perfectly fine.

 

Or just undo the nerfs but limit the 155s to the CL hull only.  It'll be the IJN rival for a future Cleveland anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
7,307 posts
3,329 battles

 

Yes there are sucky stock ships but good god, light caliber guns that have the turret traverse of the warspite? Really?

 

Simple:

Step 1: Get EM

Step 2: Get Main Bat Mod 2

Step 3: Spray HE at anything that moves with choice AP shots

Step 4:??????

Step 5: Profit! Literally!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
2,029 posts

 

Yes there are sucky stock ships but good god, light caliber guns that have the turret traverse of the warspite? Really?

 

I may have been numbed to that grinding up the Russian DD line :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
7,307 posts
3,329 battles

 

The "I do well in it therefore it is good" argument has been debunked many times. I did well in with 155s personally, but honestly it felt like a handicapped ship. Zero ability to turn and fire whatsoever, I didn't even feel like I was truly playing the Japanese tier 8 cruiser until I started using the 203s.

 

No its "She does better statistically than every nonpremium ship stock" argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,320 battles

 

I may have been numbed to that grinding up the Russian DD line :P

 

I have grinded up to the Ognevi.  Only one with turret traverse that bad is the Gremlin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
2,029 posts

 

No its "She does better statistically than every nonpremium ship stock" argument.

 

Is that still the case if you look exclusively at post nerf stats though?  I love my Mogami, but that wasn't the case before upgrading her guns.  Even with Demolition Experts and flags, I'd usually only do around 30k damage.  When you land 200+ shells and do the damage of a low tier destroyer, it's not exactly a fun time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
7,130 posts
7,331 battles

 

I have grinded up to the Ognevi.  Only one with turret traverse that bad is the Gremlin.

 

It isn't Warspite or Yamato, sshhh now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
5,424 posts
3,448 battles

 

Simple:

Step 1: Get EM

Step 2: Get Main Bat Mod 2

Step 3: Spray HE at anything that moves with choice AP shots

Step 4:??????

Step 5: Profit! Literally!

 

The turret traverse even with those is still pretty awful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×