Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Sivle

Fail Platoons

23 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

30
Beta Testers
186 posts
8,006 battles

This has to end. I find it hard to believe that there is not some way to stop this on WG's end.

 

shot-16.07.03_18.08.54-0240.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,860
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
24,800 posts
3,956 battles

It can be stopped.

 

A large number of solutions have been proposed, each one reasonable and fairly easy to implement, only a few have been needlessly complicated.

 

WG just won't do it for some reason.

 

They claim it would "inhibit players' social activities".

Edited by Destroyer_Kiyoshimo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,072
[SVER]
Beta Testers
3,811 posts
10,183 battles

You laugh, that erie/isokaze could kill the entire enemy team on their own....  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,556
[GWG]
Members
8,019 posts
15,964 battles

You have my condolences.

The other team undoubtedly is closer to their Mikasa.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
8 posts
1,854 battles

I think a more appropriate solution would be to make it more clear that match making will +/- 2 tiers based on the highest in the division.

 

As for the idiocy of that guy bringing a tier 1 to a tier 8 match.  Don't assume treachery when stupidity is a more likely answer.

 

There have been times when I swear I was readied up with a T5 with some friends and somehow managed to load in with my Atago (T8).  "Stuff" happens sometimes.

Edited by h3rrmiller
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
713 posts

Only way to get action is going to be forcing it. Start taking T1's into t10 matchups, and t2's into t9 and so on and so forth. Gotta make a mess of things to get them to act.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
204
[KITSU]
Beta Testers
741 posts
3,879 battles

I have said it before and I will reiterate it here. 

 

Players should be free to play with friends regardless of tier, it is their game too.

 

NOW, having said that, there is no reason to take a T1 into a T8, that is excessive. That is no way to help someone learn how to play the game. All rights have limits and that includes the right to play with friends. 

Edited by Atomicfireball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
713 posts

There is nothing preventing someone who has climbed the tiers from rebuying a tier 3 to division up with their friend starting new at tier 1. So there is nothing stopping anyone from divisioning with friends. If I am at tiers 8-10 and a friend starts today, as it is now I just fleet up with my T8 and his T1. Screws up my and all others Win/Loss, but hey, in just a match or 2 my friends is now T2 and a couple more he's T3.

 

Trolls cannot TK willy nilly with the new system. Maybe this T1 with high rank divisioning can be their new fun way to wreak havoc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
373
[AOH]
Members
984 posts
7,157 battles

Fail divisions.

 

This is what happens when you start smoking pot.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,298
[A-D-F]
Members
7,879 posts
44,803 battles

There are no platoons in the sea. Sheesh!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,740
[SPTR]
Members
28,237 posts
21,944 battles

Fail platoons? 

Wrong game op, anyway fail divisions I know what you mean, one time I asked myself why am I killing a Kongou with my iowa in Random battle then I see that he divisioned up with a T*rdpitz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
459 posts
8,042 battles

There have been times when I swear I was readied up with a T5 with some friends and somehow managed to load in with my Atago (T8).  "Stuff" happens sometimes.

I've seen this (apparently a ''bug'' that others I  know have encountered as well) happen quite a bit when teams was going on, after joining a division and switching to random or coop mode.

I'd be looking at one ship in port, ready up, and then notice in queue or else unfortunately too late in queue that either the ship used during teams or another ship entirely had been selected instead.

 

A lot of questionable mismatched divisions is certainly players being people, but there can definitely be those occasions of unintended of ship selection.

Edited by Billy_Burns_91

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,716 posts
8,224 battles

It can be stopped.

 

A large number of solutions have been proposed, each one reasonable and fairly easy to implement, only a few have been needlessly complicated.

 

WG just won't do it for some reason.

 

They claim it would "inhibit players' social activities".

 

And that is carap, the entire concept that it would 'inhibit players social activities', well WG, what about all of the other players on that team or any other team where it happens, what about the 13 other people? You don't think for a moment that it inhibits their social activity or their play time by allowing fail divisions (toons) to continue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30
Beta Testers
186 posts
8,006 battles

Agreed that it may not have been on purpose and I certainly was not too put out by it. I am not really living on the edge in that a lost game or two ruins my day. I just think it would be best for all, new players included, if there was a hard stop, say +\-2 tiers on a division. I can't imagine that was a good experience for that tier 1 player. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,640
[WOLF1]
Members
9,915 posts
18,626 battles

Agreed that it may not have been on purpose and I certainly was not too put out by it. I am not really living on the edge in that a lost game or two ruins my day. I just think it would be best for all, new players included, if there was a hard stop, say +\-2 tiers on a division. I can't imagine that was a good experience for that tier 1 player. 

 

I will ask again....

DID YOU WIN?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30
Beta Testers
186 posts
8,006 battles

 

I will ask again....

DID YOU WIN?

 

I don't remember. I played a fair amount of games yesterday and no one win or loss sticks out. Does a win or a loss  matter in the context of this issue? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
17,510 posts

Could have sworn WG was introducing division tier restrictions next patch. Uness I misread something?

 

saw numerous threads in this forum about what WoT is doing

 

but don't recall anything about what WoWS is doing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,860
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
24,800 posts
3,956 battles

Could have sworn WG was introducing division tier restrictions next patch. Uness I misread something?

 

I don't remember that. The only restrictions in MM were direct matching of top tier ships (T6 BB -> T6 BB, other tiers mix and match as normal) and rough equalization of ship types (3-4 DD on both sides, 3-4 BB on both sides, for example).

 

No changes to divisions or how they affect MM that I can recall.

Edited by Destroyer_Kiyoshimo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,640
[WOLF1]
Members
9,915 posts
18,626 battles

 

I don't remember. I played a fair amount of games yesterday and no one win or loss sticks out. Does a win or a loss  matter in the context of this issue? 

 

 

 

it does... especially if the Erie was responsible for helping in that win... I have seen and participated in many a Umikaze div win in tier 8 and 9 matches....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
11,026 posts
30,669 battles

Never mind, I misread "The number of divisions on each team can only differ by 1" as "The tier of ships in a division can only differ by 1".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×