365 [RSRC] Arbinshire Beta Testers 1,258 posts 9,265 battles Report post #1 Posted June 23, 2016 Just thought I'd share. I was quite surprised. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
138 Rekkoff Beta Testers 259 posts Report post #2 Posted June 23, 2016 Dafuq? O.o Luck shot sir. lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1 Riceball01 Members 32 posts 1,636 battles Report post #3 Posted June 23, 2016 Wow, is the Sims' AP round actually that good? Having only played IJN DDs and only up to the Minekaze, I always just use HE since there's no real difference in damage between the two and AP is just more likely to bounce. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,326 [MUDDX] CAPTMUDDXX Banned 8,144 posts 25,407 battles Report post #4 Posted June 23, 2016 Bravo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,887 [NSF] Big_Spud Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters 5,304 posts 9,284 battles Report post #5 Posted June 23, 2016 I am convinced that some ship have holes in their armor. Just the other day I citpenned a Colorado with AP from Cleveland....at 14.5km. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,855 RedSeaBear Members 5,450 posts 21,020 battles Report post #6 Posted June 23, 2016 Did some crew member of the Texas leave a hatch open? Or did your crew get their hands on some of the legendary Stalinum rounds? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
435 715 Alpha Tester 1,140 posts 2,160 battles Report post #7 Posted June 23, 2016 Sims OP please nerf!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
365 [RSRC] Arbinshire Beta Testers 1,258 posts 9,265 battles Report post #8 Posted June 23, 2016 Wow, is the Sims' AP round actually that good? Having only played IJN DDs and only up to the Minekaze, I always just use HE since there's no real difference in damage between the two and AP is just more likely to bounce. Not really, but you can do good damage shooting under the front turrets of BBs and such. The tracers in that screenshot are where I was aiming and got the cit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,852 Madwolf05 ∞ Alpha Tester 7,170 posts 4,070 battles Report post #9 Posted June 23, 2016 That special USN armor modeling )))) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,196 GhostSwordsman Members 6,586 posts 8,564 battles Report post #10 Posted June 23, 2016 I'm starting to think that something might be up with the NY/Texas' armor model(or maybe their armor is just that bad and I don't recall it being so when I played through the NY). I know the NY class doesn't have spectacular bow armor, or spectacular armor in general, but it's seems odd that DD AP would pen the belt at 5km or a CA's 8" guns would easily pen the belt under 7km. But a while ago, I saw a video of someone play testing the new Furutaka C hull against stationary bots in the training room. When he got to the part where he was shooting at the tier 5 BBs, he found that he couldn't pen a broadside Kongou under 7km with Furu's 8" guns, but he could citadel a slightly angled NY straight through the belt with Furu's 8" guns. I haven't tested this myself, but after seeing this, I'm leaning towards something being wrong with the armor model. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
972 [-K--] Killjoy1941 Members 3,075 posts 6,658 battles Report post #11 Posted June 23, 2016 Texas doesn't have AoN or an extended belt, so there's going to be that inevitable weak spot for those one-in-a-million shots. You can actually do this to any BB with relatively comparable shell/armor weights. I've scored two citadels at range against Montanas with my New Orleans, for example. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,211 10T0nHammer Members 7,307 posts 3,304 battles Report post #12 Posted June 23, 2016 DDs confirmed OP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
78 manavdharma Beta Testers 973 posts 2,500 battles Report post #13 Posted June 23, 2016 u sir are a Sims expert. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
472 Flametz Banned 2,485 posts 977 battles Report post #14 Posted June 23, 2016 I am convinced that some ship have holes in their armor. Just the other day I citpenned a Colorado with AP from Cleveland....at 14.5km. They do. Secondary guns on the side count as holes, so it's entirely possible to loop an AP shot through them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
627 Naughtius_Maximus Beta Testers 3,000 posts 4,522 battles Report post #15 Posted June 23, 2016 Wow, is the Sims' AP round actually that good? Having only played IJN DDs and only up to the Minekaze, I always just use HE since there's no real difference in damage between the two and AP is just more likely to bounce. No it's downright awful. With Gremy alone Omaha can be cit at a broadside starting roughly 8km. With 5" guns like Sims it is ~5km in the same situation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
365 [RSRC] Arbinshire Beta Testers 1,258 posts 9,265 battles Report post #16 Posted June 23, 2016 No it's downright awful. With Gremy alone Omaha can be cit at a broadside starting roughly 8km. With 5" guns like Sims it is ~5km in the same situation. Pretty much this. You have to be extremely close to pen belts with Sims, but there are a few areas you can aim for to get standard pens on BBs. Superstructures on Nagato and American BBs are also pennable at around 6km. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
229 [-_W_-] Izolyn Members 1,089 posts 2,418 battles Report post #17 Posted June 23, 2016 There being some sort of weak spot in Texas/NY's armor would make sense. I hit a citadel on a New York from about 16km in Molotov using the spotting plane, something I have since resoundingly failed to replicate against much closer NYs and Texases. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
43 Sturg303 Alpha Tester 12,531 posts 11 battles Report post #18 Posted June 23, 2016 What modules using on it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,072 [SVER] Sinboto Beta Testers 3,810 posts 10,030 battles Report post #19 Posted June 23, 2016 I can cit a new york with a cruiser, yeah I think the low tier american armor is just odd. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
177 [AARG] RearAdmiralButts Beta Testers 533 posts 10,229 battles Report post #20 Posted June 23, 2016 You def can get a citadel on a weakspot against someone that is offering a flat broadside at very close range. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,370 Terrible_Turtle Members 5,202 posts Report post #21 Posted June 23, 2016 Plunging fire from 5km?? That's USN shell arcs for ya! lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
964 [HINON] giovybez Members 3,375 posts 32,515 battles Report post #22 Posted June 23, 2016 That was unexpected. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
797 [PSV] Personator Privateers 5,523 posts 6,129 battles Report post #23 Posted June 23, 2016 I'm starting to think that something might be up with the NY/Texas' armor model(or maybe their armor is just that bad and I don't recall it being so when I played through the NY). I know the NY class doesn't have spectacular bow armor, or spectacular armor in general, but it's seems odd that DD AP would pen the belt at 5km or a CA's 8" guns would easily pen the belt under 7km. But a while ago, I saw a video of someone play testing the new Furutaka C hull against stationary bots in the training room. When he got to the part where he was shooting at the tier 5 BBs, he found that he couldn't pen a broadside Kongou under 7km with Furu's 8" guns, but he could citadel a slightly angled NY straight through the belt with Furu's 8" guns. I haven't tested this myself, but after seeing this, I'm leaning towards something being wrong with the armor model. Japanese AP shells have terrible penetration when it comes to their own battleships. The USN have weaker broadside armor due to how flat it is compared to the IJN, is my guess. Anyone can penetrate the side of USN BBs, but some have trouble with the sides of IJN BBs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
365 [RSRC] Arbinshire Beta Testers 1,258 posts 9,265 battles Report post #24 Posted June 23, 2016 Japanese AP shells have terrible penetration when it comes to their own battleships. The USN have weaker broadside armor due to how flat it is compared to the IJN, is my guess. Anyone can penetrate the side of USN BBs, but some have trouble with the sides of IJN BBs USN BB armor is consistently easier to pen than IJN BBs, even at the belt, and the weak spots of USN BBs are much easier to hit in my opinion. It's especially noticeable when you shoot AP out of DD guns, or something like 152mm American or Russian guns. USN BB armor schemes are just really insufficient against low caliber guns, but IJN BBs are incredibly resilient against smaller calibers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,548 [EPOXY] Tedster_ Wiki Editor, Members, Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers 5,899 posts 13,522 battles Report post #25 Posted June 23, 2016 Texas doesn't have AoN or an extended belt, so there's going to be that inevitable weak spot for those one-in-a-million shots. You can actually do this to any BB with relatively comparable shell/armor weights. I've scored two citadels at range against Montanas with my New Orleans, for example. that's because WG can't make non-square citadels. if you hit a specific spot in the torpedo bulge at a specific angle, you'll pen it and trigger the citadel zone, despite not penning the belt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites