Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Mr_Alex

It seems Submarines are coming

57 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,110 battles

 Umm no. They modeled them once upon a time to see if they could make them work, they couldn't. I doubt subs are coming.

 

Hell the game engine as it stands can't even support them. Let me know when WG pits out a new game engine that can handle it, then I'll worry about subs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
76
[NO2BB]
Members
306 posts
4,921 battles

Summing up the circle jerk in advance so everybody  dont have to waste time posting regurgitations of the same arguements for the 1000th time:

 

 

  • Popcorn Emote
  • Insert WOWS "no subs" video here
  • Submarines are too slow, it would take you the whole match to travel a quarter of the mapp
  • Submarines are not fleet ships
  • DDs do what subs do
  • WG is too lazy
  • It would require full retexturing of all maps and rebalancing of game mechanics
  • They would be OP or garbage
  • Too strong submerged, insta-gibbed when surfaced
Edited by _Zergling
  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,207 posts
5,424 battles

Summing up the circle jerk in advance so everybody  dont have to waste time posting regurgitations of the same arguements for the 1000th time:

 

 

  • Popcorn Emote
  • Insert WOWS "no subs" video here
  • Submarines are too slow, it would take you the whole match to travel a quarter of the mapp
  • Submarines are not fleet ships
  • DDs do what subs do
  • WG is too lazy
  • It would require full retexturing of all maps and rebalancing of game mechanics
  • They would be OP or garbage
  • Too strong submerged, insta-gibbed when surfaced

 

let's get this started.

 

:popcorn:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
726 posts
1,805 battles

Just remember folks: Any ship can be a submarine.....once. :trollface:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

Information from a non-credible 3rd party site. Wonderful. I don't see subs happening after WG has repeatedly said "no subs".

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,513
Members
16,315 posts
12,285 battles

Summing up the circle jerk in advance so everybody  dont have to waste time posting regurgitations of the same arguements for the 1000th time:

 

 

  • Popcorn Emote
  • Insert WOWS "no subs" video here
  • Submarines are too slow, it would take you the whole match to travel a quarter of the mapp
  • Submarines are not fleet ships
  • DDs do what subs do
  • WG is too lazy
  • It would require full retexturing of all maps and rebalancing of game mechanics
  • They would be OP or garbage
  • Too strong submerged, insta-gibbed when surfaced

 

NO SPOILERS!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,596
[-KIA-]
Banned
9,382 posts
28,311 battles

  • Submarines are too slow, it would take you the whole match to travel a quarter of the mapp
  • Submarines are not fleet ships
  • DDs do what subs do
  • WG is too lazy
  • It would require full retexturing of all maps and rebalancing of game mechanics
  • They would be OP or garbage
  • Too strong submerged, insta-gibbed when surfaced

So that this thread doesn't have to go any further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
730 posts
2,345 battles

Summing up the circle jerk in advance so everybody dont have to waste time…

 

Thanks for stealing our circle jerk!

 

(what's a fellow got to do, to get a little…)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,644
[O7]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
12,147 posts
9,111 battles

Summing up the circle jerk in advance so everybody  dont have to waste time posting regurgitations of the same arguements for the 1000th time:

 

 

  • Popcorn Emote
  • Insert WOWS "no subs" video here
  • Submarines are too slow, it would take you the whole match to travel a quarter of the mapp
  • Submarines are not fleet ships
  • DDs do what subs do
  • WG is too lazy
  • It would require full retexturing of all maps and rebalancing of game mechanics
  • They would be OP or garbage
  • Too strong submerged, insta-gibbed when surfaced

 

You forgot:

awxMdQx_460s.jpg

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,594 posts
7,435 battles

Its interesting that WOW had bought Big World when WOT was in its infancy but I wonder if WOW has upgraded or developed more capabilities into the software since aquisition in Aug of 2012

 

http://venturebeat.com/2012/08/07/wargaming-acquires-bigworld-middleware-firm-for-45m-exclusive/

 

As many had said BW cannot render realistic a object underwater but as with anything else there has to be some module that can be developed or maybe that is out of the question?

Also I may add - maybe the sub can be rendered without showing the water underneath but show it like the Carrier instead. You could get a topview of the sub instead ....hmmmmm...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
5,082 posts
5,575 battles

Summing up the circle jerk in advance so everybody  dont have to waste time posting regurgitations of the same arguements for the 1000th time:

 

  • Popcorn Emote
  • Insert WOWS "no subs" video here
  • Submarines are too slow, it would take you the whole match to travel a quarter of the mapp
  • Submarines are not fleet ships
  • DDs do what subs do
  • WG is too lazy
  • It would require full retexturing of all maps and rebalancing of game mechanics
  • They would be OP or garbage
  • Too strong submerged, insta-gibbed when surfaced

 

TvyY5Tm.jpg

 

Let's see if anyone gets the reference...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,513
Members
16,315 posts
12,285 battles

 

TvyY5Tm.jpg

 

Let's see if anyone gets the reference...

 

sVaT2U1.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
639 posts
1,355 battles

Summing up the circle jerk in advance so everybody  dont have to waste time posting regurgitations of the same arguements for the 1000th time:

 

 

  • Popcorn Emote
  • Insert WOWS "no subs" video here
  • Submarines are too slow, it would take you the whole match to travel a quarter of the mapp
  • Submarines are not fleet ships
  • DDs do what subs do
  • WG is too lazy
  • It would require full retexturing of all maps and rebalancing of game mechanics
  • They would be OP or garbage
  • Too strong submerged, insta-gibbed when surfaced

Would just make more people whine about DDs

Long Reloads

Basically Just a Stealth Ship

Fastest max speed of 20knots at T10 On the Surface.

Fastest max speed of 12 knots at T9 Submerged.

Would just make more people whine about DDs

No Armor

All Citadel

Half the ship is Unarmored Ammo Racks

Best turning circle ever bar non

Worst of all, it would just make more people whine about DDs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
726 posts
1,805 battles

 

TvyY5Tm.jpg

 

Let's see if anyone gets the reference...

 

Dam it! I know the episode, I can picture it so clearly in my mind, but I can't for the life of me remember what he was saying to her !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×