Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Sinboto

Iowa and montana buff?

15 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,072
[SVER]
Beta Testers
3,810 posts
10,030 battles

I hear they are catching a buff soon, but can't really think of what, they gonna catch the american's decapping armor or something? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,242
[NDA]
Beta Testers
5,251 posts
8,893 battles

they are getting accuracy + re-balancing of stats i believe. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

All the devs said is more than one aspect will be buffed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
259 posts
11,172 battles

Somewhere (I cant remember what Q&A) on Armored Patrol a dev said that almost all the stats will be buffed in one way or another. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

Somewhere (I cant remember what Q&A) on Armored Patrol a dev said that almost all the stats will be buffed in one way or another. 

 

Honestly, TAP isn't very reliable. You're better off just looking for the primary source youself since he never gives credit or cites the original party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
652 posts

Why on earth Iowa need buff?  It's great BB right now and it's very strong already (disclaimer - I own Iowa and recently started making positive balance in it). I think any buff and nerf is unneccessery unless ship is worst winrate in a game. We following path of modern states - extra laws brings unhappiness and provoke new ways of frauds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,430 posts
3,437 battles

Why on earth Iowa need buff?  It's great BB right now and it's very strong already (disclaimer - I own Iowa and recently started making positive balance in it). I think any buff and nerf is unneccessery unless ship is worst winrate in a game. We following path of modern states - extra laws brings unhappiness and provoke new ways of frauds.

 

Except the Iowa and Montana aren't that good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
261
[EGI]
[EGI]
Beta Testers
1,243 posts
32,233 battles

Why on earth Iowa need buff?  It's great BB right now and it's very strong already (disclaimer - I own Iowa and recently started making positive balance in it). I think any buff and nerf is unneccessery unless ship is worst winrate in a game. We following path of modern states - extra laws brings unhappiness and provoke new ways of frauds.

 

Just how often do we need evidence of the need for downvotes ? :hmm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

Why on earth Iowa need buff?  It's great BB right now and it's very strong already (disclaimer - I own Iowa and recently started making positive balance in it). I think any buff and nerf is unneccessery unless ship is worst winrate in a game. We following path of modern states - extra laws brings unhappiness and provoke new ways of frauds.

 

Because the Iowa is outperformed by the Amagi?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
169
[-GK-]
[-GK-]
Members
541 posts
15,134 battles

 

Because the Iowa is outperformed by the Amagi?

 

does Amagi also outperforms Izumo? cause I have both and Izumo its better, even stock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
652 posts

 

Because the Iowa is outperformed by the Amagi?

 

Shall WG buff all BB's who's outperformed by Amagi? Because out of 23 BB's, Amagi holding 5th place, Iowa and Montana - 15th and 16th respectively and there's whole bunch of others, like New York for example. Or shall they buff Amagi until it outperforms Imp.Nikolay? All is nonsense - as I said unless you're buffing end-list ship, buffing is just way of pleasing active crowd. Just like in politics.

https://warships.today/vehicles/na

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
261
[EGI]
[EGI]
Beta Testers
1,243 posts
32,233 battles

 

Shall WG buff all BB's who's outperformed by Amagi? Because out of 23 BB's, Amagi holding 5th place, Iowa and Montana - 15th and 16th respectively and there's whole bunch of others, like New York for example. Or shall they buff Amagi until it outperforms Imp.Nikolay? All is nonsense - as I said unless you're buffing end-list ship, buffing is just way of pleasing active crowd. Just like in politics.

https://warships.today/vehicles/na

 

 

If a developer says " we are going to buff X ship because it isn't on the whole performing as we want it to " which is what this is based on, a Q&A from AP, why would you assert that it is crowd pleasing?  The decision to change a ship by WG is based on their metrics of performance and what they want to see in their game.  Your desire that WG leave things as they are would effectively would tie their hands preventing them from ever altering the game.  WG don't get it perfect first time every time, so after careful review they should be allowed to alter the content.  

 

You have for some bizarre reason equated their desire to balance ship performance with political populism ?   Just how often does WG get accused of doing exactly what the player base wants ?  How often do they get accused of IGNORING what the player base wants ?  On balance it is by far the latter so the suggestion that adjustment = populism is baseless.  Time to re-adjust your tinfoil hat  :fishpalm:

Edited by Swine_007

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

 

Shall WG buff all BB's who's outperformed by Amagi? Because out of 23 BB's, Amagi holding 5th place, Iowa and Montana - 15th and 16th respectively and there's whole bunch of others, like New York for example. Or shall they buff Amagi until it outperforms Imp.Nikolay? All is nonsense - as I said unless you're buffing end-list ship, buffing is just way of pleasing active crowd. Just like in politics.

https://warships.today/vehicles/na

 

 

If a ship is not performing its intended purpose effectively, it will be buffed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×