Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
HBZK100

Idea for USS Hornet?

29 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
1,482 posts
2,386 battles

Hey all, I was thinking, for another premium aircraft carrier, we could do something fun stuff this time around.  The saipan's configs did have a impact to this.

 

What if WG put 2(3) squads of F8F bearcats and 4(6) squadrons of AD2 Skyraiders on the Hornet?  Making it a 2/0/3.

 

I think it would be pretty cool, however I think it's boarderlining OPness for tier 7, maybe tier 8?


What are your thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,054 posts
2,359 battles

Before we think about another premium USN CV, I think we should look at an IJN premium CV.

 

Akagi or Kaga anyone? 

 

Or....... Shinano :trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,482 posts
2,386 battles

Before we think about another premium USN CV, I think we should look at an IJN premium CV.

 

Akagi or Kaga anyone? 

 

Or....... Shinano :trollface:

 

Igh, not the Shinano. :P

 

I would love to see one of those Kaga ships in the game.  How about a 2/5/0? :trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,719 posts
4,106 battles

Before we think about another premium USN CV, I think we should look at an IJN premium CV.

 

Thats probably whats going to happen, Feel like it should be enterprise as the next USN Prem CV though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,622
[-KIA-]
Senior Volunteer Moderator, Beta Testers, Supertester, Privateers, Senior Volunteer Moderator
6,550 posts
8,491 battles

Before we think about another premium USN CV, I think we should look at an IJN premium CV.

 

Akagi or Kaga anyone? 

 

Or....... Shinano :trollface:

 

Shinano would be Tier 10, I think.

 

I agree, WG should first do Premium CV's for other Nations first. Graf Zeppelin? Akagi or Kaga?

 

EDIT: Also, Hornet is a Essex-Class CV, it would therefore be Tier 9. Are you talking about the Yorktown-Class Hornet? or the Essex-Class Hornet?

Edited by DarthDoge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,054 posts
2,359 battles

 

Igh, not the Shinano. :P

 

I would love to see one of those Kaga ships in the game.  How about a 2/5/0? :trollface:

 

Mmmm.. the pain on a BB's face when 20 torps are being fired at him... Holy crap, the 5 squadrons are gonna be Shimas that can fly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,482 posts
2,386 battles

 

Mmmm.. the pain on a BB's face when 20 torps are being fired at him... Holy crap, the 5 squadrons are gonna be Shimas that can fly

 

Yep for sure.  "WHOA, just got sniped by a Kaga. OP!!!"  *Suddenly out of no where, patch 0.5.6 intros BBs with Def AA Fire* :trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,719 posts
4,106 battles

 

Mmmm.. the pain on a BB's face when 20 torps are being fired at him... Holy crap, the 5 squadrons are gonna be Shimas that can fly

 

Yeah and all the bad players will get it nerfed, USN had two Torp squads at higher tier many moons ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,622
[-KIA-]
Senior Volunteer Moderator, Beta Testers, Supertester, Privateers, Senior Volunteer Moderator
6,550 posts
8,491 battles

 

Yep for sure.  "WHOA, just got sniped by a Kaga. OP!!!"  *Suddenly out of no where, patch 0.5.6 intros BBs with Def AA Fire* :trollface:

 

Iowa and Montana both have pretty OP AA, they don't need Def AA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,054 posts
2,359 battles

 

Shinano would be Tier 10, I think.

 

I agree, WG should first do Premium CV's for other Nations first. Graf Zeppelin? Akagi or Kaga?

 

EDIT: Also, Hornet is a Essex-Class CV, it would therefore be Tier 9. Are you talking about the Yorktown-Class Hornet? or the Essex-Class Hornet?

 

Historically, didn't the Shinano have about a 40 plane limit?

 

Though, to compensate for such a drawback, WG would have to give it OP planes which the IJN actually have. Shinano making it into the game is highly unlikely though 

 

Though, I can't help but entertain the idea :P

Edited by Camping4XP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,622
[-KIA-]
Senior Volunteer Moderator, Beta Testers, Supertester, Privateers, Senior Volunteer Moderator
6,550 posts
8,491 battles

 

Historically, didn't the Shinano have about a 40 plane limit?

 

Though, to compensate for such a drawback, WG would have to give it OP planes which the IJN actually have. Shinano making it into the game is highly unlikely though 

 

Though, I can't help but entertain the idea :P

It would truly be interesting, a Yamato-Class hull Aircraft Carrier... You would be invincible! (except for plunging fire) MUAHAHAHAA! *cough cough* sorry, I got carried away.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,482 posts
2,386 battles

 

Historically, didn't the Shinano have about a 40 plane limit?

 

Though, to compensate for such a drawback, WG would have to give it OP planes which the IJN actually have. Shinano making it into the game is highly unlikely though 

 

Though, I can't help but entertain the idea :P

 

Yeah it did, Shinano was a hybrid of sorts.  Her airgroup was only a measly 40 aircraft (or so), meanwhile the additional 80+ aircraft were designed excusively for refitting the now empty IJN Carriers from the "Turkey Shoot" ordeal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,054 posts
2,359 battles

It would truly be interesting, a Yamato-Class hull Aircraft Carrier... You would be invincible! (except for plunging fire) MUAHAHAHAA! *cough cough* sorry, I got carried away.

 

Yamato has a 16 km detection range.. Shinano would probably have something just as bad. A part of me really wants the Shinano in-game just to see the shenanigans that will ensue from its release.

 

EDIT: I just remembered that the Midway's detection is 18 km. Forgot that there was a carrier with a worse detection

Edited by Camping4XP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,719 posts
4,106 battles

Yamato has a 16 km detection range.. Shinano would probably have something just as bad. A part of me really wants the Shinano in-game just to see the shenanigans that will ensue from its release

 

From what I heard Yamato tends to Viking funeral Barge if it gets under fire, but Shinano did have an armored deck so that may stop some fires

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
496 posts
3,049 battles

It would truly be interesting, a Yamato-Class hull Aircraft Carrier... You would be invincible! (except for plunging fire) MUAHAHAHAA! *cough cough* sorry, I got carried away.

 

Or you can just use a single torpedo and watch as the shinano sinks from a gas explosion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
1,837 posts
3,359 battles

The Shinano was already in the game I believe during the alpha phase of the game. From what I was told it was not really good at being a tier 10. Besides from the very rushed construction shoddy conversion to a aircraft carrier the Shinano experienced a 40 plane limit which would be absolutely crippling in high tier CV games. So if it will be placed at tier 9-10 WG would have to buff its plane limit much higher or find a paper design to replace it.

Edited by FallenZulu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,054 posts
2,359 battles

 

Or you can just use a single torpedo and watch as the shinano sinks from a gas explosion.

 

And severely long cooldowns on its Damage Control Parties. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,304 posts
11,472 battles

Soryu pls, is it too much to ask for a Hiryu with a normal damn island?

 

Edited by Gavorche

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
5,281 posts
12,191 battles

Before we get another premium carrier, I want them to actually get them balanced well and made playable for the average players so they'll actually use them and those of us currently playing bang our heads on a wall a little yes with the joke that is current CV balance.

 

That said, if there going to make Hornet and have it premium, it should be the Doolittle loadout of the original 15 B-25's and 2-3 groups of fighters (Hornets fighters were below decks for when the B-25's left/were shoved off for protection) That way you have a carrier that's unique and different (you can make the bombers different then the DB's) without screwing around too much like they had to with Saipan. I'll take B-25's landing on a carrier for gameplay's sake to see that as unhistorical as it may be. That's one of those things I actually prefer the arcade aspect because in that regard, you can do it and maintain some historical nature, after all, they did get 16 of them off the Yorktown class Hornet's flight deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters
322 posts
4,470 battles

EDIT: Also, Hornet is a Essex-Class CV, it would therefore be Tier 9. Are you talking about the Yorktown-Class Hornet? or the Essex-Class Hornet?

Most likely he's talking about the Essex-class, seeing how the Yorktown-class never fielded the F8F or the Skyraider.

 

Though I think Ibuki (if her conversion was completed) would be an interesting premium carrier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,482 posts
2,386 battles

No, I was talking about the yorktown class Hornet that launched the Doolittle raid.  An essex class CV at tier 7 would be WAY to OP.

 

I disagree with making Hornet with B25 bombers, however the only way I could see it being viable is if it was a 1 time only consumable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,054 posts
2,359 battles

No, I was talking about the yorktown class Hornet that launched the Doolittle raid.  An essex class CV at tier 7 would be WAY to OP.

 

I disagree with making Hornet with B25 bombers, however the only way I could see it being viable is if it was a 1 time only consumable.

 

Hey.. it'd be a premium CV theoretically. WG can put something in that's unorthodox.. Namely... B25 bombers :trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,622
[-KIA-]
Senior Volunteer Moderator, Beta Testers, Supertester, Privateers, Senior Volunteer Moderator
6,550 posts
8,491 battles

 

Hey.. it'd be a premium CV theoretically. WG can put something in that's unorthodox.. Namely... B25 bombers :trollface:

I thought you mean B-52 Bombers for a moment there... Phew, got my heart pounding XD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,053
[SYN]
Members
16,027 posts
12,803 battles

 

Historically, didn't the Shinano have about a 40 plane limit?

 

Though, to compensate for such a drawback, WG would have to give it OP planes which the IJN actually have. Shinano making it into the game is highly unlikely though 

 

Though, I can't help but entertain the idea :P

 

Only 40ish.

But the wings would have consisted of later model aircraft, which were far larger than their predecessors.

A7M Reppuu, B7A Ryusei and D4Y Suisei.

These larger aircraft were starting to become so large, that they didn't fit on the elevators of earlier carriers.

 

 

Late model IJN carrier based airplanes lacked a compact fold, which reduced stowage capacity.

The IJN also didn't store their airplanes on deck, unlike what the USN did.

Those ultra high capacity USN carriers are a combination of compact fold + storing on deck.

 

Aircraft stored on deck are susceptible to being blown off the deck, which is exactly what happened during Typhoon Cobra.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×