Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Magic_N

All servers report to Russian dev team

41 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
216 posts

I know a lot of people are mad about NA being inactive/less players/no events/.../ 

 

Well, the thing is all reports/suggestions/complaints will be forwarded to Russian dev team. NA office or other offices around the world have really nothing t0 do except responding to non-technical questions/issues.

 

PS: I read a Q&A interview on Chinese WOWs forum. The director of Chinese server says Russian CA/CL will get better because it is their game even though many of the ships are based from paper. Also, US CV will get nerfed a bit while IJN will get better. 

 

Chinese servers are very active. Many technical staff are active on those forum answering rumors or questions whatever. I will keep you informed as I hear anything interesting.

 

If you can understand Chinese, here is the link to the interview regarding possible game changes.

http://bbs.wows.kongzhong.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=91230&extra=page%3D2

 

Have fun with R CA/CL 

Edited by Magic_N
  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

Except Chinese server who they manage themselves in terms of sales and events. However, a lot of things the game developer will restrain them to release new ship before everyone else. For example, on Chinese server they were going to release a tier VIII CA, but WGaming asked them to stop the sale, so the sales are currently postponed. 

 

Ship garage, not sure if that is what it will be called is coming soon. 

 

They are planning to limit number of DDs/CVs in game.

Edited by Magic_N

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,852
Alpha Tester
7,170 posts
4,070 battles

Why would they nerf the USN CVs? The only USN CV that currently out performs the IJN CVs in terms of damage is the Midway.

 

Furthermore, every single USN CV is beaten in win rate by the ENTIRE IJN line.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

Why would they nerf the USN CVs? The only USN CV that currently out performs the IJN CVs in terms of damage is the Midway.

 

Furthermore, every single USN CV is beaten in win rate by the ENTIRE IJN line.

 

Not sure. It is being discussed at the moment according to the Q&A interview.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
10,919 posts
4,873 battles

They are planning to limit number of DDs/CVs in game.

 

They've already limited CVs per game, and I'm pretty sure WG has said they won't be limiting DDs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

 

They've already limited CVs per game, and I'm pretty sure WG has said they won't be limiting DDs.

 

I can quote your the conversation, but you need to understand Chinese though. I am not saying that, it was the director saying according to their russian partner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

And why should I give a crap? The Game meta changes, all you have to do is learn to adapt....

 

You don't. Many people do. Since NA office is pretty quiet, i will try my best to contribute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
4,886 posts

PS: I read a Q&A interview on Chinese WOWs forum. The director of Chinese server says Russian CA/CL will get better because it is their game even though many of the ships are based from paper. Also, US CV will get nerfed a bit while IJN will get better. 

 

heh, chinese/asian servers seem to play lousy tricks on wg, a lot of leaks come from there and now this bias claim from a whole local director...

 

btw are not they happy about their broken anshan, the best t6 dd if not the best t6 ship overall

 

 

They've already limited CVs per game, and I'm pretty sure WG has said they won't be limiting DDs.

 

actually wg said they are thinking about limiting dd and even nerfing ijn dd... -_-

Edited by bad_arcade_kitty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

 

heh, chinese/asian servers seem to play lousy tricks on wg, a lot of leaks come from there and now this bias claim from a whole local director...

 

btw are not they happy about their broken anshan, the best t6 dd if not the best t6 ship overall

 

 

actually wg said they are thinking about limiting dd and even nerfing ijn dd... -_-

 

That ship is not popular in Chinese server from what I have seen. It seems like not that big of a deal to them. Popular ships are des moines/Zao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
2,420 posts
1,809 battles

Why would they nerf the USN CVs? The only USN CV that currently out performs the IJN CVs in terms of damage is the Midway.

 

Furthermore, every single USN CV is beaten in win rate by the ENTIRE IJN line.

 

Yeah, but not by enough to please the Wargaming devs!:trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

 

Yeah, but not by enough to please the Wargaming devs!:trollface:

 

I think it has something to do with too many US CV plays compared to IJN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

What the Chinese Server does has little to do with us...

 

Believe or not all you want. Just what I hear and I share. That is it.
Edited by Magic_N

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,466
[KTKM]
Beta Testers
4,633 posts
4,076 battles

actually wg said they are thinking about limiting dd and even nerfing ijn dd... -_-

 

If the Russian Cruisers don't reduce the number of destroyers then yes, they will nerf Japanese destroyers.

However due to the large pool of destroyers if they start limiting it eventually the number of destroyers would overflow with players and the system would crash.

Even so, statistics show that for every 2 destroyers, there's 2 battleships or 1 cruiser so the issue most likely is a glitch with the MM system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

The interview was back in February and they were already discussing about radar, which back then in NA there was nothing about radar at that time. yeah, they leak stuff and most of them would come true eventually. So if you think Chinese server has nothing to do with NA server, then don't follow this thread. Thanks.

Edited by Magic_N

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
4,886 posts

 

If the Russian Cruisers don't reduce the number of destroyers then yes, they will nerf Japanese destroyers.

However due to the large pool of destroyers if they start limiting it eventually the number of destroyers would overflow with players and the system would crash.

Even so, statistics show that for every 2 destroyers, there's 2 battleships or 1 cruiser so the issue most likely is a glitch with the MM system.

 

oh, that crash part is funny

 

it's theoretically possible if the number of players wanting to play dd isn't limited and they wait an unlimited time

 

also here is the quote http://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/03/21/wows-qa-12th-march-2016/

 

And another question, how will you balance the number of DD’s in random and will you do anything about it?

A. We’re considering limiting the number of DD’s on each team. We’re also considering changing high tier IJN DD’s stats.

 

imo nerfing dd would be silly when shima barely can hold 50% winrate (and t10 dd is played mostly by pretty good players) and bucky with kanagroo have 49%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,661
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
12,413 posts

The chinese server is completely different. They even have a tier 9 premium.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

 

oh, that crash part is funny

 

it's theoretically possible if the number of players wanting to play dd isn't limited and they wait an unlimited time

 

also here is the quote http://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/03/21/wows-qa-12th-march-2016/

 

And another question, how will you balance the number of DD’s in random and will you do anything about it?

A. We’re considering limiting the number of DD’s on each team. We’re also considering changing high tier IJN DD’s stats.

 

imo nerfing dd would be silly when shima barely can hold 50% winrate (and t10 dd is played mostly by pretty good players) and bucky with kanagroo have 49%

 

I guess my source is accurate then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

The chinese server is completely different. They even have a tier 9 premium.

 

what ship is it? The highest is 8, tirpitz at the moment.

 

It is different, but like i said earlier. The game developer has the say to stop anything though.

 

NA has Russian CA already. Chinese server will receive the update on 29, which is a week later.

Edited by Magic_N
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
495 posts
12 battles

 

heh, chinese/asian servers seem to play lousy tricks on wg, a lot of leaks come from there and now this bias claim from a whole local director...

 

Do not categorize all of Asia to the Chinese please.

Its like saying the American continent is represented by USA alone.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
495 posts
12 battles

 

what ship is it? The highest is 8, tirpitz at the moment.

 

It is different, but like i said earlier. The game developer has the say to stop anything though.

 

NA has Russian CA already. Chinese server will receive the update on 29, which is a week later.

 

Its a reskinned Iowa, the USS Missouri

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

 

Do not categorize all of Asia to the Chinese please.

Its like saying the American continent is represented by USA alone.

 

More players mean less secrecy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
216 posts

 

Its a reskinned Iowa, the USS Missouri

 

It is planned from what I read. Not available at the moment in game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×