Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
AltSeagullBBM

Please Keep the extra rewards for finishing in top 5 of match

13 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
134 posts
14,446 battles

Yesterday was a lot of fun with the extra rewards.

 

Not only did we want to win but we also wanted to contribute the most.  This was an excellent change and it should be kept.

 

25% more exp for finishing in top 5, and 25% more credits if you finish in the top 5 and win.

 

100% more crew exp if you finish #1

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
93 posts
1,595 battles

Yesterday was a lot of fun with the extra rewards.

 

Not only did we want to win but we also wanted to contribute the most.  This was an excellent change and it should be kept.

 

25% more exp for finishing in top 5, and 25% more credits if you finish in the top 5 and win.

 

100% more crew exp if you finish #1

 

 

 

I like it!! good luck...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
373 posts

I think the event must be for the losing team. Because we cant carry a entire team, and is unfair to play well and be the best player in tha game and lose.

 

I think the best player on the losing team must gain a 25% / 50% xp + forever. To help the people who got a very very bad team.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,829 posts
6,653 battles

I believe that this sort of system encourages the players to become mercenaries.

 

The only reason I'd be able to obtain an escort as a carrier is if a player is willing to sacrifice exp and credits to follow me for most of the match.

 

The only reason I'd be hovering my bombers over destroyers instead of using them for additional attack runs is because they're being dangerous to my team's battleships.

 

The only reason battleships would perform a glorious charge instead of hanging back and farming damage is because they're doing it for the team.

 

And for cruisers, there's a difference between screening and chasing down targets to the edge of a map.

 

If you're aiming to become the top 5, the above-listed behaviors are not the efficient ways to do it.

Edited by Misniso

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
500 posts
2,381 battles

 I believe that this sort of system encourages the players to become mercenaries.

 

I understand your feeling; but, most of the allies ( he said sarcastically ) I have played with are already mercenaries. I say most. I have also been on real "teams", not just a collection of green players, who really understand how to work together and support one another to win.

 

My favorite game this past weekend was where a one of our side at the end capped the enemy and we would have won by points had he stayed in the cap. But, when their CV was spotted this guy abandoned the cap and went after the CV when there was absolutely no way for him to get a kill before the time ran out. Everyone was telling him not to leave the cap and he ignored all to go after a kill. We lost.

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
87
[E-M-U]
Members
373 posts
11,926 battles

I believe that this sort of system encourages the players to become mercenaries.

 

 

Pardon my ignorance, but what do you mean by "mercenaries?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,829 posts
6,653 battles

 

Pardon my ignorance, but what do you mean by "mercenaries?"

 

Players looking out only for themselves.

Edited by Misniso

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
15,669 posts
4,714 battles

I would agree with the latter. I've long said the top 1 or even 3 players on the losing team should get the win "bonus" and the bottom 1-3 players on the winning team shouldn't get the bonus (to even it out, and to cut down on bots which do exist- that is they just enter match after match, do horrid, have a 30-35% WR, and a 0.0 K/D).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
87
[E-M-U]
Members
373 posts
11,926 battles

 

Players looking out only for themselves.

 

Ummmm - pardon my further ignorance - but isn't that pretty much what we have already??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
500 posts
2,381 battles

 mercenaries

 

Soldiers who fight only for money. They have no allegiance or interest in anything other than money. Soldiers of Fortune.

As long as you win and they get paid, they are loyal. When the money runs out or they are defeated, they quit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,829 posts
6,653 battles

 

Ummmm - pardon my further ignorance - but isn't that pretty much what we have already??

 

Is this the part where I'm supposed to laugh?  Your setup took too long, I've seen the joke before, and someone already mentioned your point.   You get a 3 out of 10.  It'd be 2.5 normally, but you get half a point for trying.

 

And, yes, you do see stupid players but you also see players working together.  This feature would encourage players working together to work alone.

Edited by Misniso

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
386
[O7]
Beta Testers
1,804 posts
12,331 battles

I'd be ok with them doing what WoT does and rewarding a compensation amount of credits and xp for getting certain battle hero medals.  I don't agree with just handing out the bonus multipliers for the top 3 or 5 of the losing team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×