Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
RockaholicRaven

Wg please explain to me why people like this are permitted in rank ques?

59 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

160
[WAP]
Beta Testers
797 posts
10,513 battles

Not only is this like the 20th player ive run into that has no idea how to use torps but the dude has the audacity to blame me for him launching torps into me from 1.7km

 

my%20position%20to%20him%20right%20when%straight%20on%20my%20path_zps0jsd4qmj.jpnothing%20i%20can%20do%20to%20dodge%20th2%20torp%20hits%20for%20over%2080%20of%2from%20full%20health%20to%205k_zps1jqgrk

Edited by RockaholicRaven

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39,480
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
27,858 posts
27,299 battles

Because they meet all the requirements to play this free-to-play online game:

 

1) Have internet

2) Have a computer that was considered 'mediocre' 5 years ago

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
534
[VPMN]
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
2,095 posts
8,175 battles

So I'll ask the obvious question, while he was wrong in firing his torps when and where he did, why did you continue to turn into them when you obviously saw them coming?

 

You had plenty of time to adjust heading and speed. Again, the other player is at fault but so are you from your screen shots. 

 

Oh and N&S.

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
160
[WAP]
Beta Testers
797 posts
10,513 battles

Realistically, from a systems standpoint, how would you filter out "people like that"?

 

Im not sure but something seriously needs to be done. The reduction of team torp damage does nothing but allow people like this to not learn because now instead of killing me with 2 torps he just leaves me useless with no repair to get picked off by enemy ships. Either make punishment for people like this in ranked ques extremely harsh or i dont know. I think tkrs in ranked que should get a 24hr ban from ranked for first offense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,038
[BONKS]
Members
1,738 posts
20,731 battles

You forgot to redact the player's name in one of the screenshots... Now you know why he is a 46% player :medal:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
160
[WAP]
Beta Testers
797 posts
10,513 battles

So I'll ask the obvious question, while he was wrong in firing his torps when and where he did, why did you continue to turn into them when you obviously saw them coming?

 

You had plenty of time to adjust heading and speed. Again, the other player is at fault but so are you from your screen shots. 

 

Oh and N&S.

screenshots were taken from a replay in the actual game i was launching torps at enemy nc i will give you screen shots of my actual view point if you would like? also i was full speed with speed boost active already mid turn have you ever tried stopping a benson going 42 knots with a response time of about 2 seconds to dodge friendly torps? it was eat 2 or eat all

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
534
[VPMN]
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
2,095 posts
8,175 battles

screenshots were taken from a replay in the actual game i was launching torps at enemy nc i will give you screen shots of my actual view point if you would like? also i was full speed with speed boost active already mid turn have you ever tried stopping a benson going 42 knots with a response time of about 2 seconds to dodge friendly torps? it was eat 2 or eat all

 

Ah, ok. Wasn't aware they were pulled from replay. 

 

Carry on.

 

People make mistakes, I've been torped multiple times by allies, all you can really do is shrug it off and move on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
160
[WAP]
Beta Testers
797 posts
10,513 battles

 

Ah, ok. Wasn't aware they were pulled from replay. 

 

Carry on.

 

People make mistakes, I've been torped multiple times by allies, all you can really do is shrug it off and move on.

My point is if you are going to que up in rank que's(whats supposed to be a competitive more professional que'ing arena) YOUR SKILL LEVEL SHOULD BE WAY ABOVE MAKING MISTAKES LIKE TORPING FRIENDLIES ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR THAT

Edited by RockaholicRaven

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
870
[A-D]
Beta Testers, Alpha Tester
2,638 posts

I think tkrs in ranked que should get a 24hr ban from ranked for first offense

 

Actually seems kind of reasonable, still lets them play randoms.

 

There are systems in place to automatically deal with TKers (I think escalating eventually to a perma-ban? But I'm not sure if they ever went live with that last part). Sending replays to support can sometimes do something, if it looks like an intentional TK. That's the hard part, though... for a system to tell what's done on purpose and what was just a very bad accident.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
534
[VPMN]
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
2,095 posts
8,175 battles

My point is if you are going to que up in rank que's(whats supposed to be a competitive more professional que'ing arena) YOUR SKILL LEVEL SHOULD BE WAY ABOVE MAKING MISTAKES LIKE TORPING FRIENDLIES ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR THAT

 

While I don't disagree, not everyone will live up to your standards.

 

Why are you yelling?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
160
[WAP]
Beta Testers
797 posts
10,513 battles

 

Actually seems kind of reasonable, still lets them play randoms.

 

There are systems in place to automatically deal with TKers (I think escalating eventually to a perma-ban? But I'm not sure if they ever went live with that last part). Sending replays to support can sometimes do something, if it looks like an intentional TK. That's the hard part, though... for a system to tell what's done on purpose and what was just a very bad accident.

well the people who make an honest mistake are usually extremely apologetic unlike this guy who called me a [edited](<<another word for mentally handicap person)after he hit me from 1.4km with torps

Edited by RockaholicRaven

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
365
[RSRC]
Beta Testers
1,258 posts
9,265 battles

I like how you actually managed to get chatbanned somehow. That's the most impressive thing in this thread to me.

  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
160
[WAP]
Beta Testers
797 posts
10,513 battles

I like how you actually managed to get chatbanned somehow. That's the most impressive thing in this thread to me.

Yet another point to how broken the reporting system is not a word mentioned the entire game and banned. Now i will be quite honest im renown for foul behavior towards people like this and i will be honest i had a mouthful of words coming but yeah chat banned

Edited by RockaholicRaven

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
870
[A-D]
Beta Testers, Alpha Tester
2,638 posts

well the people who make an honest mistake are usually extremely apologetic unlike this guy who called me a [edited](<<another word for mentally handicap person)after he hit me from 1.4km with torps

 

Yep, that's where support comes in--making those kind of calls/judgment that the systems can't. (But still, making the friendly damage restrictions more stringent in ranked... doesn't seem like a bad idea to me, since it's a higher level of play).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
649
[D6]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
4,051 posts

:popcorn:

 

Good practice in dodging torpedoes.  Looks like you needed it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44
[DRACS]
Members, In AlfaTesters
298 posts
1,395 battles

I like how you actually managed to get chatbanned somehow. That's the most impressive thing in this thread to me.

 

i thought that too, never seen it before :D
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,716 posts
4,076 battles

At least you had a 46%'er... last night I had a 1k game plus 32% Winrate on my team, rest were 35-45%. (yes, after that retarded of a game I had to go look them up....) I was the only person on the team who does over 20k damage average... and they are in ranked, well, they are almost all that is in ranked now since the last season guys already ranked out again or aren't bothering this season.

 

A few examples excluding names of course and damage rounded to the nearest 1,000th.

 

Battles: 858       WR: 39%     Average Damage: 18,000 - Derpitz

Battles: 243       WR: 46%     Average Damage: 22,000 - Atago

Battles: 2140     WR: 41%     Average Damage: 14,000 - North Carolina

Battles: 116       WR: 43%     Average Damage: 21,000 - Atlanta

Battles: 1152     WR: 31%     Average Damage: 14,000 - Atago

 

This is why ranked is nothing more than a smaller Random. There is nothing "Competitive" or skill based about it, it is who has the proper tier and can count to potato can play

 

 

Edited by Batwingsix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members, Beta Testers
1,591 posts
2,659 battles

Stupid mistakes like that are bound to happen, its annoying when it occurs but not worth getting an ulcer over.  The most reprehensible crap I've seen was last season an enemy Kongo intentionally wedged his ship into the A9 corner on New Dawn the entire match and left his team to die with only one active battlewagon.  Not even AFK, he started shooting back when we finally found him at the end of the match.  Making dumb mistakes is one thing, being a craven cur intentionally trying to ride your way up the rankings without engaging is a whole nother level of messed up. 

Edited by TheStarSlayer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,228
[-AFK-]
Members
7,321 posts
3,826 battles

At least you had a 46%'er... last night I had a 1k game plus 32% Winrate on my team, rest were 35-45%. (yes, after that retarded of a game I had to go look them up....) I was the only person on the team who does over 20k damage average... and they are in ranked, well, they are almost all that is in ranked now since the last season guys already ranked out again or aren't bothering this season.

 

I had a player that would get into rank 5-2 bracket and then TK and troll because it was "funny" in season 2. Many players that hit the rank 10 cap had WRs that... made me cry lol 45% being the upper echelon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
160
[WAP]
Beta Testers
797 posts
10,513 battles

You forgot to edit out  name in the 3rd screenshot from top, in the chatbox.

 

fixed
Edited by RockaholicRaven

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
4,982 posts
6,249 battles

I see a 96Delta was the Mahan.

Need to cover those team panels m8.

N&S to the max.

Edited by KmsH44
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×