1,440 Sirus_Patton Members 3,243 posts 1,579 battles Report post #1 Posted January 12, 2016 (edited) Now, if you're looking for some fancy NDA stuff, this isn't it. Katori was once the tier 1 IJN cruiser, and unlike the other tier 1 ships she was a proper cruiser and not a gunboat. While she had her torpedo tubes removed (which she had in reality), she still far out-classed the Erie and would still make the Orlan and Hermelin look like kitties trapped in a paper bag. Officially she was a Japanese training cruiser (along with her sisters Kashima and Kashii) designed to prepare crews for duty on various ships from destroyers to battleships. Katori herself was engaged by the USS Iowa, in which the Iowa displayed it's amazing gunnery capabilities by bracketing Katori in the very first salvo she fired (and would continue to bracket her with all 8 salvos fired from the main guns). Of the three, only Kashima would survive the war, being used for reparations before being scrapped in 1947. In game Katori was head and shoulders above Erie in every way. Her 2x2 gun layout provided solid firepower, firing slower than Erie but with higher damage shells. Her pure displacement advantage gave her just shy of twice the HP of Erie, although she was less maneuverable. In the end, it was decided that Katori needed to be replaced as she was far too good as a tier 1, and thus she was replaced with the Hashidate. I hope some day WG will bring her back as a tier 2 with her torpedoes intact (2x2 21" torp tubes, one on each side) in the vein of the Emden and Albany. If you look closely, you can see the circles on the sides of the ship where the torpedo launchers would be mounted. Edited January 12, 2016 by Sirus_Patton 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,013 Batwingsix Alpha Tester 2,716 posts 4,076 battles Report post #2 Posted January 12, 2016 She was solid, maybe WG can turn her into a Tier 2 anniversary ship or something. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
39,506 [HINON] Lert Alpha Tester 27,874 posts 28,013 battles Report post #3 Posted January 12, 2016 Ah, yeah. The tier 1.5 seal clubber. I'll echo your sentiment and add my voice to the chorus that wants her back in the game. Tier 2 premie perhaps, but then, the japanese navy already has enough premies in the game. She was solid, maybe WG can turn her into a Tier 2 anniversary ship or something. Or that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,440 Sirus_Patton Members 3,243 posts 1,579 battles Report post #4 Posted January 12, 2016 Ah, yeah. The tier 1.5 seal clubber. I'll echo your sentiment and add my voice to the chorus that wants her back in the game. Tier 2 premie perhaps, but then, the japanese navy already has enough premies in the game. Or that. To be fair, she needs a boost to her rate of fire if put at tier 2. 12rpm out of 4 guns really isn't going to cut it at that point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,013 Batwingsix Alpha Tester 2,716 posts 4,076 battles Report post #5 Posted January 12, 2016 To be fair, she needs a boost to her rate of fire if put at tier 2. 12rpm out of 4 guns really isn't going to cut it at that point. Maybe balance her with the starting Japanese torps in the dual tubes. That would give her torps with slower firing guns. They hit hard enough the RPM would balance out with the fact she would have torpedo armament (depending on what torps they would put on her). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,732 Eisennagel Beta Testers 11,744 posts Report post #6 Posted January 12, 2016 If you think about it, her main guns has the same firepower as the Tenryu and the Yubari in the game, Tier 3 and 4 accordingly. Yes, dual mounted 140mms. In contrast the Erie starts with a destroyer gun, and upgrades to the Cleveland's gun. The IJN 140mm has a higher HE shell damage and RoF. With her torpedoes, AA and secondary armament, her armamentation is similar to the Tier 4 Yubari. She is just much slower. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,466 [KTKM] IKU19 Beta Testers 4,633 posts 4,078 battles Report post #7 Posted January 12, 2016 She was solid, maybe WG can turn her into a Tier 2 anniversary ship or something. Or they remove Chikuma, put Katori as tier 2, and rename Tone as Chikuma and sell her as a premium Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
635 [CHASE] NeonPeanuts Beta Testers 1,810 posts 6,064 battles Report post #8 Posted January 12, 2016 Or they remove Chikuma, put Katori as tier 2, and rename Tone as Chikuma and sell her as a premium Why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
25 Zeldek Members 245 posts 1,619 battles Report post #9 Posted January 12, 2016 Oh, wow, wish I could've seen this ship in action. I'd love to see it added (with the ship being upgraded or intact of course) into the game. Perhaps it could be a reward ship once the game's been out for a while for the people who have played for a few years? (So a while into the future.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
442 EmperorMaxwell Alpha Tester 2,409 posts 8,275 battles Report post #10 Posted January 12, 2016 Katori was fun, far better than that pile of manure we have now in the Hashidate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
179 Granitebeard Alpha Tester 1,635 posts 10,408 battles Report post #11 Posted January 12, 2016 I loved this ship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,455 [FOXEH] DoomStomper Beta Testers 3,985 posts 2,383 battles Report post #12 Posted January 12, 2016 I'd be surprised if Katori doesn't show up as a premium or reward ship at some point. Doesn't make sense for WG to take the time to model a ship, then let it just go to waste. In addition to torpedoes they could also give her the float plane she historically carried. It wouldn't make a huge difference, but could be an interesting gimmick at such a low tier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
86 TBids Members 341 posts 1,820 battles Report post #13 Posted January 12, 2016 It was a great ship and I really miss it. I do expect to someday see it be a reward ship or a premium ship. Please WG! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,466 [KTKM] IKU19 Beta Testers 4,633 posts 4,078 battles Report post #14 Posted January 12, 2016 Why? Because that leaves Tone as a silver ship without having two Chikumas in the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
246 Takeda992 Members 1,245 posts 5 battles Report post #15 Posted January 12, 2016 In my first game in CBT, I stuck her in an island and flipped the ship to her underside. What a way to handle a ship on a first date! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
25 mchung Alpha Tester 155 posts 3,097 battles Report post #16 Posted January 12, 2016 Not only her torpedo tubes but also floatplanes were removed in game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,513 atPrick__ Members 16,315 posts 12,357 battles Report post #17 Posted January 12, 2016 10/10 Would buy. This or the Tachibana Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
707 [SPTR] Fog_Heavy_Cruiser_Chokai Beta Testers 15,750 posts 4,727 battles Report post #18 Posted January 12, 2016 I had forgotten about her. She was nice. Second ship I sailed, played once with the Yubari then hopped into teching up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
44 [DRACS] Noreaga Members, In AlfaTesters 298 posts 1,395 battles Report post #19 Posted January 12, 2016 whoa forgot about her, she was the queen of the seal clubbers ! nice post OP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,053 [SYN] MrDeaf Members 16,027 posts 12,803 battles Report post #20 Posted January 12, 2016 If you think about it, her main guns has the same firepower as the Tenryu and the Yubari in the game, Tier 3 and 4 accordingly. Yes, dual mounted 140mms. In contrast the Erie starts with a destroyer gun, and upgrades to the Cleveland's gun. The IJN 140mm has a higher HE shell damage and RoF. With her torpedoes, AA and secondary armament, her armamentation is similar to the Tier 4 Yubari. She is just much slower. Broadside weight Armor Engine output Top speed Displacement Tenryu 4x 140mm, 6x torps 63mm 51,000SHP 33.0kt 3,500t Yubari 6x 140mm, 4x torps 63mm 57,900SHP 35.5kt 3,140t Kuma 6x 140mm, 4x torps 63mm 90,000SHP 36.7kt 5,500t Katori 4x 140mm, 4x torps none! 8,000HP 18.0kt 6,300t The only reason Katori can't be a T3, is because she has no armor and she's extremely slow. Although, if WG made it so she has no citadel, then I can see her being just fine in T3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
707 [SPTR] Fog_Heavy_Cruiser_Chokai Beta Testers 15,750 posts 4,727 battles Report post #21 Posted January 12, 2016 Broadside weight Armor Engine output Top speed Displacement Tenryu 4x 140mm, 6x torps 63mm 51,000SHP 33.0kt 3,500t Yubari 6x 140mm, 4x torps 63mm 57,900SHP 35.5kt 3,140t Kuma 6x 140mm, 4x torps 63mm 90,000SHP 36.7kt 5,500t Katori 4x 140mm, 4x torps none! 8,000HP 18.0kt 6,300t The only reason Katori can't be a T3, is because she has no armor and she's extremely slow. Although, if WG made it so she has no citadel, then I can see her being just fine in T3. If she had torps and no citadel, she would be superior to Yuubari, even with her slow speed, as long as Yuubari keeps that horrid citadel and 2x2 instead of 3x2 guns. Edit- I meant 2x2 and 2x1 guns. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
283 [MELON] Yuubari_Melon Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters 1,219 posts 4,156 battles Report post #22 Posted January 13, 2016 Ah, Katori. I must admit that it was pretty cool having one of the IJN's training cruisers as the tier I training ship. I'mma still take the Yuubari though, sorry Chokai. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
232 [FAL-I] rafael_azuaje Members 1,124 posts 50,240 battles Report post #23 Posted May 9, 2017 KATORI NEED BUFF: 1-add AA of 13mm 1x8 this can help katori vs CV tier 4 2-up damage torps katori has 4 torps with damege 9k per torps, now if you see Friant of tier 3 cruiser frech has 12 torps with damage of 12k per torps. 3- up armored katoki if it has possibility as was hitorical. maybe katori was this configuration AA for 1944 http://www.steelnavy.com/images/GalleryImages/katori8.jpg http://www.steelnavy.com/images/GalleryImages/katori1.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites