Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
_Marines

Poll: Best BB of Every Tier!!!

Poll: Best Battleship by Tier  

217 members have voted

  1. 1. Tier 3

    • USN - South Carolina
      158
    • IJN - Kawachi
      59
  2. 2. Tier 4

    • USN - Wyoming
      44
    • USN - Arkansas Beta
      29
    • IJN - Myogi
      16
    • IJN - Ishizuchi
      8
    • IRN - Imperator Nikolai I
      120
  3. 3. Tier 5

    • USN - New York
      26
    • IJN - Kongo
      191
  4. 4. Tier 6

    • USN - New Mexico
      80
    • IJN - Fuso
      100
    • RN - Warspite
      37
  5. 5. Tier 7

    • USN - Colorado
      43
    • IJN - Nagato
      173
  6. 6. Tier 8

    • USN - North Carolina
      41
    • IJN - Amagi
      79
    • KM - Tirpitz
      97
  7. 7. Tier 9

    • USN - Iowa
      198
    • IJN - Izumo
      19
  8. 8. Tier 10

    • USN - Montana
      17
    • IJN - Yamato
      200

64 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

289
[F11]
Members
1,017 posts
7,034 battles

What do you guys think is the best BB for her tier!!! My thanks go to our friend Kermut for posting a related poll about the best CV by tier (http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/34811-poll-best-cv-by-tier/page__mode__show). I have also pulled some data from WarshipStats' ship analytics and summarized it here. Kill/death ratio is recalculated using KDR = SKR/(1-SR), because the WarshipStats' formula for kill/death ratio is not right:

 

DU3O0q0.jpg?1

Edited by _Marines

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
777
[BARF]
Beta Testers
5,816 posts
5,497 battles

Why do people use Warshipstats? I thought I read somewhere that they collect data from searched player names only, so wouldn't that make their data collection results skewed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
289
[F11]
Members
1,017 posts
7,034 battles

Why do people use Warshipstats? I thought I read somewhere that they collect data from searched player names only, so wouldn't that make their data collection results skewed?

 

It does, but not very significantly. The stats are only unreliable if the ship is especially preferred or unpreferred not by the player population WarshipStats selects.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,644
[O7]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
12,147 posts
9,111 battles

Dunno why people are voting Tirpitz over Amagi since the Amagi is way better...

 

Also OP you didnt leave an option for no clear winner, there are a couple tiers were the BBs are very competitive with each other. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
777
[BARF]
Beta Testers
5,816 posts
5,497 battles

Dunno why people are voting Tirpitz over Amagi since the Amagi is way better...

 

Also OP you didnt leave an option for no clear winner, there are a couple tiers were the BBs are very competitive with each other. 

Ah, the Amagi is not so good in knife fights though. Nothing beats the Tirpitz in a knife fight in my experience. Those torps are a game changer, because if your enemy doesn't eat them, they can be used to force a distraction on the enemy. 

 

 

Yeah it's a shameless plug and I still do pretty poorly in it, but I think the Tirpitz and cruiser that I torped to death did worse than me, so I know I am not the worst player on this server

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
166
[5IN]
Members
1,371 posts
34,396 battles

Dunno why people are voting Tirpitz over Amagi since the Amagi is way better...

 

Also OP you didnt leave an option for no clear winner, there are a couple tiers were the BBs are very competitive with each other. 

 

I think it's partly based on having to play against them and for me the tirp is the biggest threat by far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
-Members-
6,960 posts
10,623 battles

I honestly think New York is better than Kongo.

 

Anyways.

III: Kawachi

IV: Nikolai

V: New York

VI: Fuso, New Mexico, Warspite (I admit, New Mexico is just as good)
VII: Nagato, barely edging out Colorado

VIII: Tirpitz edging out Amagi

IX: Iowa

X: Yamato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
166
[5IN]
Members
1,371 posts
34,396 battles

Add in CVs every match and include the aspect of playing against those ships and I think the poll changes a bit. 

Also a very small number of people play the prems other than the tirp.

Overall I could hardly care less but I wouldn't mind seeing the same poll regarding how much better one tier is from the last.

Other than health pool and some meager AA they hardly change anything that I notice.

Edited by Sir_Godz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,644
[O7]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
12,147 posts
9,111 battles

Ah, the Amagi is not so good in knife fights though. Nothing beats the Tirpitz in a knife fight in my experience. Those torps are a game changer, because if your enemy doesn't eat them, they can be used to force a distraction on the enemy. 

 

Yeah it's a shameless plug and I still do pretty poorly in it, but I think the Tirpitz and cruiser that I torped to death did worse than me, so I know I am not the worst player on this server

 

I have both, but the Amagi beats it out on average damage doing even more than the Iowa or Izumo and has a higher win rate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
181
[4TAC]
Members
440 posts
18,427 battles

I'm getting sick of polls that require me to answer every question. That doesn't make sense here since I haven't gotten above Tier VII.

 

I would have voted for Kongo and New Mexico at their respective tiers. I'm neutral on lower tier ships, and I haven't gotten a Nagato yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,498
Beta Testers
6,868 posts
4,189 battles

Poor Montana.

 

The state of T10 Bbs is pretty disgraceful since most people who know anything about warships give Iowa at least an edge if not complete domination of the Yamato.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
777
[BARF]
Beta Testers
5,816 posts
5,497 battles

I am conflicted for teir 5 though. I like the New York more than the Kongo, but the Kongo has the speed and range to make someone who knows what their doing able to dish out hurt first.

 

But then again it's shells are slow to the point where I can't effectively use them until I get to New York ranges anyway. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,080
Alpha Tester
6,683 posts
3,338 battles

Ah, the Amagi is not so good in knife fights though. Nothing beats the Tirpitz in a knife fight in my experience. Those torps are a game changer, because if your enemy doesn't eat them, they can be used to force a distraction on the enemy. 

 

 

However, with the 20km+ ranges that tier 8 BBs can (and do) play at, 6km torps are useless. As well, anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows that if you attack a Tirpitz at close range, you have to ambush it and then go head on. One he's dropped his fish, you can angle to bring more guns to bear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,080
Alpha Tester
6,683 posts
3,338 battles

I am conflicted for teir 5 though. I like the New York more than the Kongo, but the Kongo has the speed and range to make someone who knows what their doing able to dish out hurt first.

 

But then again it's shells are slow to the point where I can't effectively use them until I get to New York ranges anyway. Lol

 

The New York can also do long range engagements if you get Gun Fire Control Mod.1. It extends the range of the main guns to 18.4km.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
120
Members
266 posts
2,744 battles

Kongo is far, far better than New York, that'd madness.

Same with South Carolina vs Kawachi

Tier 6 is an honest even contest by everything I've seen. 

I personally think Myogi = Wyoming, but hey. I do well in both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
777
[BARF]
Beta Testers
5,816 posts
5,497 battles

Kongo is far, far better than New York, that'd madness.

Same with South Carolina vs Kawachi

Tier 6 is an honest even contest by everything I've seen. 

I personally think Myogi = Wyoming, but hey. I do well in both.

My experience has me preferring the faster rudder shift and higher velocity shells of the New York. 

 

However 26Kt is a nice speed. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
120
Members
266 posts
2,744 battles

My experience has me preferring the faster rudder shift and higher velocity shells of the New York. 

 

However 26Kt is a nice speed. Lol

You mean 30kt on a Kongo.

New Yorks have lower firepower: Slower firing guns, more dispersion, and an utterly terribly placed Q turret that gets you in trouble for using it. Kongo's ABXY turrets meanwhile angle /very/ effectively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,644
[O7]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
12,147 posts
9,111 battles

This poll just shows how people's judgement is so inaccurate. According to server stats the Amagi has tier 9 performance levels at tier 8, the Iowa performs basically as well as the Izumo know yet is rated much higher in the poll, and the tier 3 BBs are actually fairly balanced currently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
164 posts
1,543 battles

This poll just shows how people's judgement is so inaccurate. According to server stats the Amagi has tier 9 performance levels at tier 8, the Iowa performs basically as well as the Izumo know yet is rated much higher in the poll, and the tier 3 BBs are actually fairly balanced currently.

Because the amagi's design feels old, and the iowa looks sexier than izumo.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
873
[MPIRE]
Beta Testers
3,804 posts
6,762 battles

The only tier 4 option should be Nikolai. That is a given.

 

Tier 6, is a tie - Warspite's 15" and good secondaries, and manuverability, vs. the shotgun that is the 20km fuso? Both are good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×