1,319 suleiman71 -Members- 6,960 posts 10,623 battles Report post #1 Posted December 31, 2015 I have to confess something to you guys. I'd like to admit that Colorado isn't a despicable piece of trash. While she does have her shortcomings in HP, her guns are stupidly powerful, her armor is hilariously trollish, and some genius decided to give my Colorado the best RNG he could. Here are my stats in it. http://worldofwarships.com/en/community/accounts/1010776802-ShermanMedium/#tab=pvp/account-tab-ships-pvp 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,763 [-K-] Lord_Zath Supertest Coordinator, Alpha Tester, WoWS Community Contributors, Wiki Editor 6,628 posts 29,064 battles Report post #2 Posted December 31, 2015 I love the Colorado. Such fun to play! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,186 BlazerSparta Members 11,026 posts 30,666 battles Report post #3 Posted December 31, 2015 (edited) Probably just suffering from the same 'bigger guns, lower volume of fire' syndrome Furutaka, Pensacola, and Nagato have. Post buff anyway. Edited December 31, 2015 by issm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
458 AspiringCodger Beta Testers 2,029 posts Report post #4 Posted December 31, 2015 I've only played a few games in it, but love mine so far. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
546 [-K--] BelgaraththeSorcerer Members 2,680 posts 7,993 battles Report post #5 Posted December 31, 2015 I had my best game damage wise last night in my Colorado at 177k, its a really good ship, people just cant accept that it has different strengths than the Nagato.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
360 Rion12 Members 2,072 posts 2,712 battles Report post #6 Posted December 31, 2015 (edited) I honestly can't help but feel that some of the "Colorado sucks" attitude is partially a result of the complaining drivers being staggeringly unwise. I almost feel like every time I see "God, this thing stinks" or some similar comment from an opposing Colorado, he's pretty much painted himself a sign saying "free citadels" for my Nagato. I dunno, I would actually need to go try the thing out to really get a handle on why it gets the reputation it does. Edited December 31, 2015 by Rion12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,319 suleiman71 -Members- 6,960 posts 10,623 battles Report post #7 Posted December 31, 2015 I honestly can't help but feel that some of the "Colorado sucks" attitude is partially a result of the complaining drivers being staggeringly unwise. I almost feel like every time I see "God, this thing stinks" or some similar comment from an opposing Colorado, he's pretty much painted himself a sign saying "free citadels" for my Nagato. I dunno, I would actually need to go try the thing out to really get a handle on why it gets the reputation it does. Colorado doesn't deserve her crap reputation, however, she's still below average overall and an HP buff and a small accuracy buff should do the trick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
6,799 IronWolfV Alpha Tester, Beta Testers 30,523 posts 6,337 battles Report post #8 Posted December 31, 2015 I honestly can't help but feel that some of the "Colorado sucks" attitude is partially a result of the complaining drivers being staggeringly unwise. I almost feel like every time I see "God, this thing stinks" or some similar comment from an opposing Colorado, he's pretty much painted himself a sign saying "free citadels" for my Nagato. I dunno, I would actually need to go try the thing out to really get a handle on why it gets the reputation it does. Actually in CBT she was HILARIOUSLY BAD. But she has gotten way better. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
268 Hellgrunt Supertester 952 posts 13,187 battles Report post #9 Posted December 31, 2015 Colorado got a major buff a few patches ago! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
726 RogueFlameHaze Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters 8,843 posts 7,637 battles Report post #10 Posted December 31, 2015 She's not bad, shes just utterly slow, and has low HP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,153 [ARGSY] centarina Members 10,326 posts 16,228 battles Report post #11 Posted December 31, 2015 (edited) my 12 year old thinks colorado is OP he is averaging 58k dmg and hitting 30% and only 18 battles. he is retraining his captain stil and not fully upgraded. there are just lot of bad BB drivers still at tier 7, and you have to aim and hit your target with colorado. My son's stat (acecloudwalker) VII Colorado 18 11 1,046 Overall Results Battles 18 Victories 11 (61%) Battles survived 6 Damage caused 1,044,588 Warships destroyed 17 Aircraft destroyed 21 Base capture 0 Base defense 0 Average Score per Battle Experience 1,045.89 Damage caused 58,032.67 Warships destroyed 0.94 Aircraft destroyed 1.17 Main battery hit ratio 30% Base capture 0.00 Base defense 0.00 Highest Score Experience 1,323 Damage caused 128,342 Warships destroyed 3 Aircraft destroyed 15 Edited December 31, 2015 by centarina Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
819 [WOLFG] 4bRbyHSSzZ6pk Members 4,300 posts Report post #12 Posted December 31, 2015 Her only real weakness is her poor shallow HP pool, everything else about her was enjoyable to me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
206 SpeedingBus Beta Testers 1,198 posts 2,732 battles Report post #13 Posted December 31, 2015 Cool story bro I mean really you played 7 games total and think your going to keep that 58k average? Your Nagota avg dmg is 48k and is an infinitely better ship that isn't stuck with less range, worst dispersion, 15k less health and not still going 20 knots. I mean you people can pretend that the Colorado doesn't have one of the worst 48.2 win rate for BB's and its avg 42k damge that has less than 1k damage difference than the T6 New Mexico. Just stop with these threads insisting that the Colorado isn't terrible if you can still do well in her great just stop these posts. The stats don't lie the Colorado is one of the worst BB's in the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,319 suleiman71 -Members- 6,960 posts 10,623 battles Report post #14 Posted December 31, 2015 Just stop with these threads insisting that the Colorado isn't terrible if you can still do well in her great just stop these posts. The stats don't lie the Colorado is one of the worst BB's in the game. When did I deny her overall stats were bad? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5,644 [O7] 1nv4d3rZ1m Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester 12,147 posts 9,111 battles Report post #15 Posted December 31, 2015 When I played the Colorado in CBT it was terrible,absolutely the worse. It was missing shots at a couple km at broadside targets and had a long reload/bad turret traverse and had such low hp. The buff fixed the guns so that now they actually hit the target and do damage, it is pretty awesome now. Colorado 7 BB USA 12 92% 96,359 2,309 1.00 0.92 67% 1,956 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,270 Higgle Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters 4,441 posts 509 battles Report post #16 Posted December 31, 2015 (edited) She's more powerful than most people would give her credit for, especially when you stick her in a CQC situation. I tried brawling with a Colorado once, in my Fuso. I thought he would be easy food like most other players. However, I grossly underestimated his skill and ability; I went in with 32k HP and did not make it out alive. All I managed to do before sinking was chip his HP down from 16k to 14k. To his credit, he knew his ship well and was able to prioritize my ship as a target the instant I popped around an island in what turned out to be a failed surprise attack. My guns were unable to penetrate his thick armor, which was set at a near-perfect angle. At the same time, his 16" shells tore through mine as if it were made of tissue paper. I was—and still am—not used to being outplayed. Edited December 31, 2015 by Higgle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
963 [HINON] Warped_1 [HINON] Members 2,497 posts 30,290 battles Report post #17 Posted December 31, 2015 Glad you are enjoying yours and I confess I haven't tried it. Must say that when I am in my Nagato though I always think "good, they have a Colorado" when I see that opposing me on the other side ;-) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
67 [VNLD] CaptHyatt Alpha Tester 452 posts 6,738 battles Report post #18 Posted December 31, 2015 I skipped the Colorado. Do I regret it? Not really. Numerous times while rofling in my NM I'd been warned of the Colorado. Didn't particularly like the ideal of going from 12 to 8 guns, even if it was a larger caliber. Maybe one day I'll go back to her. But not today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
6,799 IronWolfV Alpha Tester, Beta Testers 30,523 posts 6,337 battles Report post #19 Posted December 31, 2015 I still think they need a final hull option that makes it a WV hull with the 5 inch turrets. Just my 2 cents. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
144 Sandman1969 Beta Testers 2,089 posts 2,379 battles Report post #20 Posted December 31, 2015 I am doing bad in mine. Just got her the other day. Can't hit for sh*t . Straddle straddle straddle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
322 Xannari Members 1,360 posts Report post #21 Posted December 31, 2015 Colorado is one of those ships that isn't really made to contend with higher tiers, and even struggles to keep up with Nagato. It definitely is a good brawler, but you can one-shot it at ranged combat. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,455 [FOXEH] DoomStomper Beta Testers 3,985 posts 2,373 battles Report post #22 Posted December 31, 2015 Actually in CBT she was HILARIOUSLY BAD. But she has gotten way better. This. Still don't think Colorado is quite up to the standard of Nagato, but she's perfectly playable now and a hell of a lot better than she used to be. Edit: Also yeah, a final WV hull would be cool as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
972 [-K--] Killjoy1941 Members 3,075 posts 6,658 battles Report post #23 Posted December 31, 2015 Cool story bro I mean really you played 7 games total and think your going to keep that 58k average? Your Nagota avg dmg is 48k and is an infinitely better ship that isn't stuck with less range, worst dispersion, 15k less health and not still going 20 knots. I mean you people can pretend that the Colorado doesn't have one of the worst 48.2 win rate for BB's and its avg 42k damge that has less than 1k damage difference than the T6 New Mexico. Just stop with these threads insisting that the Colorado isn't terrible if you can still do well in her great just stop these posts. The stats don't lie the Colorado is one of the worst BB's in the game. Nice. Someone reports doing well with Colorado, contrary to the established and holy CBT Laws of Garbage Ships, and you slag them off. Who the [edited]made you god? Of course Colorado has worse stats. Every BB potato driving her broadside gets immediately wrecked due to low HP. If you set her up with the correct modules and play her properly, she kills more games than not. You know what? I'll take that wide engagement profile, the great AA, the narrow turning circle, and the massive repair party over Nagato any day. I played my way through Colorado to Nor Car; I unexpectedly burned my free XP on Nagato because I finally got fed up with the crazy longitudinal RNG on her despite generally being a damage machine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
524 SourHammer Alpha Tester 1,907 posts 13,314 battles Report post #24 Posted December 31, 2015 The Colorado was a trash boat before they buffed its guns a bit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,728 [ABDA] crzyhawk Beta Testers 17,538 posts 12,810 battles Report post #25 Posted December 31, 2015 I think the problem with the Colorado boils down to speed. At t7 she gets put on a lot of a lot of big water maps and is forced into long range fights. By nature, she's a brawler and doesn't get the same kind of brawling opportunities on a regular basis as the other standards do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites