Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
suleiman71

I'd like to make an admission to all of you

63 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

-Members-
6,960 posts
10,623 battles

I have to confess something to you guys. 

 

I'd like to admit that Colorado isn't a despicable piece of trash. While she does have her shortcomings in HP, her guns are stupidly powerful, her armor is hilariously trollish, and some genius decided to give my Colorado the best RNG he could. 

 

Here are my stats in it. http://worldofwarships.com/en/community/accounts/1010776802-ShermanMedium/#tab=pvp/account-tab-ships-pvp

 

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,763
[-K-]
Supertest Coordinator, Alpha Tester, WoWS Community Contributors, Wiki Editor
6,628 posts
29,064 battles

I love the Colorado.  Such fun to play!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
11,026 posts
30,666 battles

Probably just suffering from the same 'bigger guns, lower volume of fire' syndrome Furutaka, Pensacola, and Nagato have.

 

Post buff anyway.

Edited by issm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
360
Members
2,072 posts
2,712 battles

I honestly can't help but feel that some of the "Colorado sucks" attitude is partially a result of the complaining drivers being staggeringly unwise.

 

I almost feel like every time I see "God, this thing stinks" or some similar comment from an opposing Colorado, he's pretty much painted himself a sign saying "free citadels" for my Nagato.

 

I dunno, I would actually need to go try the thing out to really get a handle on why it gets the reputation it does.

Edited by Rion12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
-Members-
6,960 posts
10,623 battles

I honestly can't help but feel that some of the "Colorado sucks" attitude is partially a result of the complaining drivers being staggeringly unwise.

 

I almost feel like every time I see "God, this thing stinks" or some similar comment from an opposing Colorado, he's pretty much painted himself a sign saying "free citadels" for my Nagato.

 

I dunno, I would actually need to go try the thing out to really get a handle on why it gets the reputation it does.

 

Colorado doesn't deserve her crap reputation, however, she's still below average overall and an HP buff and a small accuracy buff should do the trick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,337 battles

I honestly can't help but feel that some of the "Colorado sucks" attitude is partially a result of the complaining drivers being staggeringly unwise.

 

I almost feel like every time I see "God, this thing stinks" or some similar comment from an opposing Colorado, he's pretty much painted himself a sign saying "free citadels" for my Nagato.

 

I dunno, I would actually need to go try the thing out to really get a handle on why it gets the reputation it does.

 

Actually in CBT she was HILARIOUSLY BAD. But she has gotten way better.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,153
[ARGSY]
Members
10,326 posts
16,228 battles

my 12 year old thinks  colorado is OP    he is averaging 58k dmg and hitting 30%  and only 18 battles.    he is retraining  his captain stil and not fully upgraded.    there are just lot of bad BB drivers   still at tier 7,   and you have to aim and hit your target with colorado.  My son's stat (acecloudwalker)

 

 

VII  Colorado 18 11 1,046

     

Edited by centarina

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
1,198 posts
2,732 battles

Cool story bro I mean really you played 7 games total and think your going to keep that 58k average? Your Nagota avg dmg is 48k and is an infinitely better ship that isn't stuck with less range, worst dispersion, 15k less health and not still going 20 knots. I mean you people can pretend that the Colorado doesn't have one of the worst 48.2 win rate for BB's and its avg 42k damge that has less than 1k damage difference than the T6 New Mexico.

 

 

Just stop with these threads insisting that the Colorado isn't terrible if you can still do well in her great just stop these posts. The stats don't lie the Colorado is one of the worst BB's in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
-Members-
6,960 posts
10,623 battles

Just stop with these threads insisting that the Colorado isn't terrible if you can still do well in her great just stop these posts. The stats don't lie the Colorado is one of the worst BB's in the game.

 

When did I deny her overall stats were bad? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,644
[O7]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
12,147 posts
9,111 battles

When I played the Colorado in CBT it was terrible,absolutely the worse. It was missing shots at a couple km at broadside targets and had a long reload/bad turret traverse and had such low hp. The buff fixed the guns so that now they actually hit the target and do damage, it is pretty awesome now. 

 

Colorado 7 BB USA 12 92% 96,359 2,309 1.00 0.92 67% 1,956

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,270
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters
4,441 posts
509 battles

She's more powerful than most people would give her credit for, especially when you stick her in a CQC situation.

 

I tried brawling with a Colorado once, in my Fuso. I thought he would be easy food like most other players. However, I grossly underestimated his skill and ability; I went in with 32k HP and did not make it out alive. All I managed to do before sinking was chip his HP down from 16k to 14k. 

 

To his credit, he knew his ship well and was able to prioritize my ship as a target the instant I popped around an island in what turned out to be a failed surprise attack. My guns were unable to penetrate his thick armor, which was set at a near-perfect angle. At the same time, his 16" shells tore through mine as if it were made of tissue paper.

 

I was—and still am—not used to being outplayed. :D

Edited by Higgle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
963
[HINON]
[HINON]
Members
2,497 posts
30,290 battles

Glad you are enjoying yours and I confess I haven't tried it.  Must say that when I am in my Nagato though I always think "good, they have a Colorado" when I see that opposing me on the other side ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
67
[VNLD]
Alpha Tester
452 posts
6,738 battles

I skipped the Colorado. 

 

Do I regret it? Not really. Numerous times while rofling in my NM I'd been warned of the Colorado. Didn't particularly like the ideal of going from 12 to 8 guns, even if it was a larger caliber. Maybe one day I'll go back to her. But not today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,337 battles

I still think they need a final hull option that makes it a WV hull with the 5 inch turrets. Just my 2 cents.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,360 posts

Colorado is one of those ships that isn't really made to contend with higher tiers, and even struggles to keep up with Nagato. It definitely is a good brawler, but you can one-shot it at ranged combat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,455
[FOXEH]
Beta Testers
3,985 posts
2,373 battles

Actually in CBT she was HILARIOUSLY BAD. But she has gotten way better.

 

This.  Still don't think Colorado is quite up to the standard of Nagato, but she's perfectly playable now and a hell of a lot better than she used to be.

 

Edit:  Also yeah, a final WV hull would be cool as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
972
[-K--]
Members
3,075 posts
6,658 battles

Cool story bro I mean really you played 7 games total and think your going to keep that 58k average? Your Nagota avg dmg is 48k and is an infinitely better ship that isn't stuck with less range, worst dispersion, 15k less health and not still going 20 knots. I mean you people can pretend that the Colorado doesn't have one of the worst 48.2 win rate for BB's and its avg 42k damge that has less than 1k damage difference than the T6 New Mexico.

 

 

Just stop with these threads insisting that the Colorado isn't terrible if you can still do well in her great just stop these posts. The stats don't lie the Colorado is one of the worst BB's in the game.

 

Nice. Someone reports doing well with Colorado, contrary to the established and holy CBT Laws of Garbage Ships, and you slag them off. Who the [edited]made you god?:rolleyes:

 

Of course Colorado has worse stats. Every BB potato driving her broadside gets immediately wrecked due to low HP. If you set her up with the correct modules and play her properly, she kills more games than not. You know what? I'll take that wide engagement profile, the great AA, the narrow turning circle, and the massive repair party over Nagato any day. I played my way through Colorado to Nor Car; I unexpectedly burned my free XP on Nagato because I finally got fed up with the crazy longitudinal RNG on her despite generally being a damage machine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,728
[ABDA]
Beta Testers
17,538 posts
12,810 battles

I think the problem with the Colorado boils down to speed. At t7 she gets put on a lot of a lot of big water maps and is forced into long range fights. By nature, she's a brawler and doesn't get the same kind of brawling opportunities on a regular basis as the other standards do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×