Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
vhf

This is a bad sign

48 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

3
[K0]
Beta Testers
31 posts
7,467 battles

10 pm and MM can't fill a team. And what it came up with, just wow. I was in queue for about 40 seconds before seeing this abortion. I thought this sort of thing was worked out already.

shot-15.10.06_22.01.36-0594.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,502
[GWG]
[GWG]
Alpha Tester
29,317 posts
15,806 battles

It was a failtoon.  Not MMs fault

 

That and it was also a high tier carrier que dump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3
[K0]
Beta Testers
31 posts
7,467 battles

 

h-hey, wo can carry hard enough

 

Even if you take out the CV imbalance there's still a 5 tier difference between teams with only 7 ships total per side. Carry sure but c'mon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3
[K0]
Beta Testers
31 posts
7,467 battles

It was a failtoon.  Not MMs fault

 

I understand that but why is this still allowed? Shouldn't the folks who make decisions about MM have corrected this after four years of developing this platform?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
873
[SCCC]
Members
3,181 posts
17,515 battles

RIP Lexington 

 

Actually, a 2/1/1 Lexington is very hard to deal with a 1/2/2 Essex, if the Lexington knows what they are doing. They will 2v1 the Essex's fighters and win, or they can tie up 1 or 2 of the Essex's torpedo bomber squadrons and hamper an attack run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
180 posts
835 battles

If they have not done anything about platoons in that regard for WoT in how many years? What makes you think they will do anything about it now? 

 

This is a free to play game after all. You all should be grateful you get a game like this at all with it being free to play. Sure you would pay to get a "boost" but none the less its FREE TO PLAY what part of that do you people not understand? Like I've said (in darth vaders voice) The lack of logic in this community is disturbing.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
1,178 posts
4,895 battles

You do realize a lot of people have been avoiding tier 8+ due to the insane spike of repair costs. Im included with a Nor Cal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
1,529 posts
1,148 battles

 

I understand that but why is this still allowed? Shouldn't the folks who make decisions about MM have corrected this after four years of developing this platform?

 

You are greatly overestimating WGs level of competence when it comes to making their game work. =P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3
[K0]
Beta Testers
31 posts
7,467 battles

If they have not done anything about platoons in that regard for WoT in how many years? What makes you think they will do anything about it now? 

 

This is a free to play game after all. You all should be grateful you get a game like this at all with it being free to play. Sure you would pay to get a "boost" but none the less its FREE TO PLAY what part of that do you people not understand? Like I've said (in darth vaders voice) The lack of logic in this community is disturbing.

 

 

Free to play means they don't address long standing issues with the game and I should be grateful for this?

 

Regardless many players pay for this game and as I am one of them I feel some accountability is appropriate. And just because they've been ignored in the past doesn't mean we should stop raising the issues that exist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
180 posts
835 battles

 

Free to play means they don't address long standing issues with the game and I should be grateful for this?

 

Regardless many players pay for this game and as I am one of them I feel some accountability is appropriate. And just because they've been ignored in the past doesn't mean we should stop raising the issues that exist.

 

Hmmm yea I am one of those players that pay money to play for the added benefits. Accountability or not you are in fact paying for a free to play game to address issues that have been around for years. Like I said what makes you think they will fix them now? They want friends to play together in order to draw in more money, its simple logic.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,490
[---]
Banned
6,739 posts
10,154 battles

Welcome to tier 8+, where the repair costs are so restrictive that it's damn near impossible to do anything it seems. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
182 posts
13,699 battles

I don't know - is 40 seconds considered an extremely long wait by most folks? I guess I would rather wait another minute or two and have a better match as a result of it than to have MM go 'quick and dirty'.  The max waiting time is 5 minutes, I would be okay with them taking more of that time if it meant better matches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,298
[A-D-F]
Members
7,879 posts
44,080 battles

You do realize a lot of people have been avoiding tier 8+ due to the insane spike of repair costs. Im included with a Nor Cal.

 

Count me. I stop at T8 and every so often I ran them with the flag that reduces cost. I grind all lines, and play them equally. No interest in going past T8 until (if ever) costs go down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
123
[AK]
Beta Testers
482 posts
17,024 battles

Sadly about the only Tier 8 or higher I run more then once a day is the Tripitz, any other ships is too expensive to run save to get the daily bonus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,039
Members
34,409 posts
10,768 battles

The max waiting time is 5 minutes, I would be okay with them taking more of that time if it meant better matches.

 

Somebody in that match was waiting 5 minutes. Does nobody ever think about that?

Edited by Skpstr
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
1,753 posts
3,028 battles

 

Even if you take out the CV imbalance there's still a 5 tier difference between teams with only 7 ships total per side. Carry sure but c'mon.

 

It was only +2MM, which is better than what we saw in CBT/OBT most of the time. Also, WG adjusted MM to 'fix' the whining about CV imbalances in higher tiers. This results in long queue times and occasional queue dumps for hi tier CVs.

 

 

I understand that but why is this still allowed? Shouldn't the folks who make decisions about MM have corrected this after four years of developing this platform?

 

It was not a true 'fail platoon' in the sense that it was t1 and t10, but anyone who down-tiers a CV, especially in higher tiers, is just a moron who has no idea how MM works. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,242
[NDA]
Beta Testers
5,251 posts
8,905 battles

so what happened here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49
[ZR]
Members
482 posts
15,168 battles

They should probably figure out how to balance teams more evenly.  Midways and Yamatos are not really on the same level as things like Des Moines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
422
[F-N-B]
Beta Testers
1,411 posts
8,485 battles

It was not a true 'fail platoon' in the sense that it was t1 and t10, but anyone who down-tiers a CV, especially in higher tiers, is just a moron who has no idea how MM works. 

 

Not sure if you watch iChases stream but I remember 1 match, I think it was a New Orleans was platooned with a langley and MM put that as the CV vs iChase in his midway...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×