137 SimulationX Beta Testers 564 posts 1,104 battles Report post #1 Posted August 15, 2012 Sovetsky Soyuz plan for massive Russian WWII battleship http://www.navypedia...ia/ru_bb_17.gif Laid down in 1938, Sovetsky Soyuz was the lead ship of a class of very large, powerful, modern battleships that ignored the london naval conference tonnage limits. her hull was nearly ready for launching in june 1941 when the German attack on the Soviet Union brought work to a standstill. If she had ben completed, she would have been a match for any battleship afloat. Only the Yamato and Musashi were larger. Main armarment : 9 X 16 inch gunsLength: 269.4 mDisplacement: 59,150 tonesMore info:http://en.wikipedia....lass_battleship 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Hellsfog Beta Testers 10 posts 12 battles Report post #2 Posted August 15, 2012 I wonder if there will be a meta-game which would limit deployment. I'd love to see this try to run out of the Baltic or Black Sea. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
68 RiversOtter Members 112 posts Report post #3 Posted August 15, 2012 Oh my, this ship would be an absolute monster. Would love to see it in game. Cheers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
286 ForcestormX Alpha Tester 752 posts Report post #4 Posted August 15, 2012 Huh, hadn't heard of RU super-battleships. Thanks for sharing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
7 Semour Members 18 posts Report post #5 Posted August 15, 2012 That was a great find . To bad there were so many complications and never got finished. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
7 Dominatus Alpha Tester 41 posts Report post #6 Posted August 15, 2012 Excuse my ignorance, but how does this compare to the Stalingrad? Accounting all the technological advancements, that is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
51 [KOOKS] Goldeneye54 Beta Testers 474 posts 2,232 battles Report post #7 Posted August 15, 2012 Haven't heard of it before so thanks for showing. But to be honest I know almost nothing on Russian ships lol. I know about US, Japan, Britain, Germany, and even Italy but nothing about Russia at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
286 ForcestormX Alpha Tester 752 posts Report post #8 Posted August 15, 2012 Goldeneye55, on 15 August 2012 - 05:53 PM, said: Haven't heard of it before so thanks for showing. But to be honest I know almost nothing on Russian ships lol. I know about US, Japan, Britain, Germany, and even Italy but nothing about Russia at all. Same problem here :( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
7 Joel47 Alpha Tester 42 posts 1,387 battles Report post #9 Posted August 15, 2012 THe reason we haven't heard about many Russian ships is that so many of them went unfinished. Logistics dictated a choice between ships and tanks, and given what was staring at them across Poland, they made the logical choice. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
384 BlackAngelCom Beta Testers 1,127 posts 5,907 battles Report post #10 Posted August 16, 2012 Dominatus, on 15 August 2012 - 04:11 PM, said: Excuse my ignorance, but how does this compare to the Stalingrad? Accounting all the technological advancements, that is. No one knows how they would have come together. The Soviets had no real experience building large warships, and that's very, very important for how well the things actually work. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest KGB Guest 0 posts Report post #11 Posted August 19, 2012 Everyone will have an experience of driving this ship, as well as more powerful one, the Project 24. battleship in our game. Here is it: http://photo.starnet...roekt_24-50.jpg 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,275 Crag_r Alpha Tester 5,710 posts 2,411 battles Report post #12 Posted August 19, 2012 Ah ha! i knew it! you would try and get a soviet ship to be the most OP in game! Sovetsky Soyuz class battleship; http://en.wikipedia....lass_battleship 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
197 [-YK-] RMS_Gigantic Beta Testers 847 posts 20,222 battles Report post #13 Posted August 19, 2012 Would you mind elaborating on how it is OP instead of just assuming that it is because it's from the Soviet Union? The Project 24 is beautifully designed, by the way. I look forward to seeing its 3D rendering! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
146 xthetenth Alpha Tester 506 posts 896 battles Report post #14 Posted August 19, 2012 It's very doubtful it'd be OP, the design displaced a ridiculous amount but it was very inefficient. It's comprehensively beaten by the Iowa and Montana. I'll compare to the Montana because the Iowa buys a lot of speed and getting up to 33 knots is very very expensive in terms of tonnage (in the Iowa design, that and alleviating the cramping from the South Dakotas cost 10,000 tons). The Montana is slightly heavier than the Sovietsky Soyuz. The Montana is better armored (inclined belt and a thicker deck), has a better main battery with three more 16" rifles and the US superheavy 16" shell, a much stronger AA suite, and probably better secondaries (the Sovietsky Soyuz has 6" guns which are nice for hitting destroyers at longer range, but the Montana's 5"/54 guns are already relatively long range, numerous and fire quite quickly). Finally the Montana would have had the best radars in the world and much better range. The Sovietsky Soyuz was the product of a ship design industry that hadn't done serious work of the sort. Even more so than Germany, which at least had some institutional memory of WWI (and still did everything wrong and had no idea what they were doing but I digress), the Soviets weren't going to be able to make a competitive design without using a lot of weight, and the Montana was a project by the best designers in the world for conserving tonnage (the US had always been shaving ounces to hit their tonnage targets and they had a lot of practice hitting tonnage targets since before WWI, and look at the South Dakota for how much they could do under a very restrictive weight limit) The Soviets need the Project 24 so they can have competitive battleships, not OP monsters. Besides, the Yamato's heavier. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1 Megan_Fox Members 10 posts Report post #15 Posted August 19, 2012 very interesting ship :rolleyes: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,238 Ariecho Alpha Tester 4,440 posts Report post #16 Posted August 19, 2012 (edited) Here area two pictures that show the Project 24 (top) displayed by KGB with the H44 (center) and the Richelieu (bottom) http://img208.images.../1052599qe3.jpg Again Richelieu (right), H44 (center) and Project 24 (left) Edited August 19, 2012 by Ariecho Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,921 mr3awsome Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester 11,461 posts 1,963 battles Report post #17 Posted August 19, 2012 That H44 looks boss Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
197 [-YK-] RMS_Gigantic Beta Testers 847 posts 20,222 battles Report post #18 Posted August 19, 2012 mr3awsome, on 19 August 2012 - 05:00 PM, said: That H44 looks boss Which is why it was stated that the furthest the developers would ever consider going with the Germans would be either the H42 or H43. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,138 JeeWeeJ Members 3,591 posts Report post #19 Posted August 19, 2012 The H44 also looks like a hard-to-miss target...ITS HUGE!!!!! Still, the Sovetsky Soyuz looks nice...and the Richelieu look as sexy as ever. Now i really want an Alsacre.. :( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,921 mr3awsome Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester 11,461 posts 1,963 battles Report post #20 Posted August 19, 2012 I want Alsace too (see sig) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest KGB Guest 0 posts Report post #21 Posted August 19, 2012 mr3awsome, on 19 August 2012 - 05:42 PM, said: I want Alsace too(see sig) There won't be H44 in game, as well as A150, Tillman BBs and other elven-magic ships. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2 cipher12 Beta Testers 31 posts Report post #22 Posted August 19, 2012 So no 20" inch guns in the game then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,238 Ariecho Alpha Tester 4,440 posts Report post #23 Posted August 19, 2012 KGB, on 19 August 2012 - 05:59 PM, said: There won't be H44 in game, as well as A150, Tillman BBs and other elven-magic ships. Understood! It just happened to be on the same picture as the Project 24. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,138 JeeWeeJ Members 3,591 posts Report post #24 Posted August 19, 2012 KGB, on 19 August 2012 - 05:59 PM, said: There won't be H44 in game, as well as A150, Tillman BBs and other elven-magic ships. [sarcasm] Wait? No ships with 24 16" guns? But...but...that cant be overpowered??? It's not like it'll WTFPWN every BB in sight... :happy: [/sarcasm] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest KGB Guest 0 posts Report post #25 Posted August 19, 2012 cipher12, on 19 August 2012 - 06:02 PM, said: So no 20" inch guns in the game then? Yes. 18" is the maximum, so you can expect Yamato and its pre-production projects, as well as any other ship and/or ship project with 18" guns or less. The exception will be made for Germany, because Germans usually made their ships with less number of guns, than other countries. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites