1,440 Sirus_Patton Members 3,243 posts 1,579 battles Report post #1 Posted September 3, 2015 Yup, you read it right folks. I'm not certain how this hit the server, but ok. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
378 [JKSDF] Sturmkurz [JKSDF] Members 1,603 posts 2,495 battles Report post #2 Posted September 3, 2015 Musashi, Shinano(became a aircraft carrier) and Yamato are the only ones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
138 Menemy Beta Testers 1,023 posts 2,801 battles Report post #3 Posted September 3, 2015 (edited) Not incorrect. 4 planned, 2 completed, 1 converted, 1 canceled. Hull 111 is the fourth. (There was also 797 but atleast 111 had the keel set up and was cancelled after a year of construction) Edited September 3, 2015 by Menemy 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
541 Killer1941 Beta Testers 1,620 posts 1,238 battles Report post #4 Posted September 3, 2015 (edited) 2 BBs, 1 CV and 1 cancelled ship. Edited September 3, 2015 by Killer1941 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,319 suleiman71 -Members- 6,960 posts 10,623 battles Report post #5 Posted September 3, 2015 WG, when they say how many in the class, includes cancelled ships I believe. Yamato, Musashi, Shinano (converted to aircraft carrier), and 111 (cancelled after Midway). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
337 [-K--] RightYouAreKen Members 1,151 posts 9,208 battles Report post #6 Posted September 3, 2015 The test would be what they said for the Iowa class. 4 or 6? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,440 Sirus_Patton Members 3,243 posts 1,579 battles Report post #7 Posted September 3, 2015 (edited) The test would be what they said for the Iowa class. 4 or 6? Yup, they are listing the number proposed for construction, because Iowa is listed at 6. Seems rather odd that they wouldn't list the actual number built. Edit: It's also really strange, because Ibuki began construction and was cancelled after being mostly completed, but the info card lists it only as a design and never as ordered. Edited September 3, 2015 by Sirus_Patton Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,290 [SYN] Kuckoo Members 5,947 posts 13,809 battles Report post #8 Posted September 3, 2015 Yup, you read it right folks. I'm not certain how this hit the server, but ok. Nope. Yamato. Musashi. Shinano 4th unnamed unit - Laid down, and after more than a year of construction was partially complete, but was then cancelled and scrapped. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
855 Carrier_Taiyo Beta Testers 2,420 posts 1,809 battles Report post #9 Posted September 3, 2015 Not incorrect. 4 planned, 2 completed, 1 converted, 1 canceled. Hull 111 is the fourth. (There was also 797 but atleast 111 had the keel set up and was cancelled after a year of construction) Woah, cool! I didn't know that! I thought there were only 3! (one a carrier) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
246 Cowcharge Alpha Tester 434 posts 4,351 battles Report post #10 Posted September 4, 2015 Whattya expect from people who write "steering gears"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,244 Seraphil Alpha Tester 4,156 posts 8,061 battles Report post #11 Posted September 4, 2015 I like the Entered Service and Ships in a Series notes, but a lot of the actual info blurbs are really watered down from what they used to be. And they STILL say Hosho was planned as an oil tanker when that was not the case. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
770 [TXGUN] donaldEpott [TXGUN] Members 4,596 posts 13,514 battles Report post #12 Posted September 4, 2015 The test would be what they said for the Iowa class. 4 or 6? They show 6 for the Iowa. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
627 [MAHAN] AdmiralPiett Beta Testers 1,605 posts 7,195 battles Report post #13 Posted September 4, 2015 I noticed the omission with Ibuki immediately. Also, the descriptions have changed for the worse unfortunately. Oh wells. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
33 Kilroy357 Members 113 posts 1,120 battles Report post #14 Posted September 4, 2015 (edited) It's just like with the Iowa class. 6 were planned, 4 were finished. Illinois and Kentucky would have been the 5th and 6th. A bit of KY is still around. Some of its bow was grafted to WI after the latter accidentally rammed a destroyer in fog and looked like this: ( no one died on either ship ) Edited September 4, 2015 by Kilroy357 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
9,860 [NMKJT] VTAdmiral Beta Testers 24,800 posts 3,947 battles Report post #15 Posted September 4, 2015 It's just like with the Iowa class. 6 were planned, 4 were finished. Illinois and Kentucky would have been the 5th and 6th. A bit of KY is still around. Some of its bow was grafted to WI after the latter accidentally rammed a destroyer in fog and looked like this: I saw the shape and couldn't resist 11 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
180 GermanDragon Alpha Tester 455 posts Report post #16 Posted September 4, 2015 The picture does show clearly that the front of the bow had very little armor. A trade mark of the American Armor style of only armoring the areas of critical importance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,440 Sirus_Patton Members 3,243 posts 1,579 battles Report post #17 Posted September 4, 2015 The picture does show clearly that the front of the bow had very little armor. A trade mark of the American Armor style of only armoring the areas of critical importance. Actually most nations adopted the all-or-nothing armor scheme. It protected the important bits while massively saving weight over the old dreadnought armor style. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,290 [SYN] Kuckoo Members 5,947 posts 13,809 battles Report post #18 Posted September 4, 2015 I saw the shape and couldn't resist That's going to end up being someone's avatar or signature. Too good not to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2 ___TWIGGY___ Members 14 posts 336 battles Report post #19 Posted September 4, 2015 Wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites