Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Seek3Destroy

Am i missing something? Still no AA for my Arkansas??

35 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Testers
23 posts
4,351 battles

Was hoping the ship Michael Phelps could outswim would get some anti air capabilities... I love the ship hardcore as I feel unique when taking it out to sea but cmon, it needs a little AA!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
436 posts
2,160 battles

I have to honestly agree to some point.. but my issue with the Arkansas is when in a fight I am not able to shoot the other ships due to range.. I would rather have some slight range buffs to the arkansas. I am usually 1.8 km short on range to be effective for shooting.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
23 posts
4,351 battles

I guess I need to do a little research on the ships history. Planes probably weren't a big issue in the time frame it was first in service.. Makes sense in that aspect, unfortunately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
323 posts
3,583 battles

I guess I need to do a little research on the ships history. Planes probably weren't a big issue in the time frame it was first in service.. Makes sense in that aspect, unfortunately.

 

Don't bother. WG isn't terribly interested in things like history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
193 posts
2,327 battles

if it was more of a upgraded Wyoming it wouldnt be such a bad ship. im currently debating on selling the thing unless they upgrade it

Edited by NightmareDancer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
432
[NBNG]
Beta Testers
1,660 posts
5,014 battles

its a reward ship that only BETA testers are going to get, it will never be on sale. No new players will ever get it. You dont have to play it. Its a gift as a thank you. Really no grounds to complain. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
23 posts
4,351 battles

Heck, I don't even care if the AA guns are on par with the Wyoming. I'd be content with a few Roman candles shooting back... Something, anything!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,545
[GWG]
[GWG]
Alpha Tester
29,405 posts
15,833 battles

I have to honestly agree to some point.. but my issue with the Arkansas is when in a fight I am not able to shoot the other ships due to range.. I would rather have some slight range buffs to the arkansas. I am usually 1.8 km short on range to be effective for shooting.

 

 

ount Gun Fire Control Systen Modification 1 for a 16% range increase which puts you on par with the Wyoming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
32 posts
1,139 battles

is free ship, premiums in general are worse the their normal types.  No AA for free premiums because balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In AlfaTesters
957 posts
3,049 battles

What's very sad is WG own description of it described it as having good AA.

 

 

http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/31853-closed-beta-reward-uss-arkansas/

 

Read the description just under the photo. The official announcement was removed when we went to OBT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
576 posts
1,158 battles

The advantage of the Arkansas is the 6 upgrade slots when the Wyoming only has 2.

 

Granted, 2 of those are to bring some terrible stats back up to par with the original ship, Rudder Shift and Gun Range.

 

However, because it has so many upgrades to work with you can specialize your Arkansas to your play style, especially if you are willing to give up on Rudder Shift and Gun range and go for something else, like damage control.

 

I do have the rudder shift and main gun range, but even with that I ALSO have the main gun accuracy and detection range upgrades that the Wyoming can't ever have.

 

But, you will have to put up with no AA of any kind.  That can't be changed.

 

Personally, I am fine with the lack of AA guns.  They're never going to save your ship anyway,  At Tier 4 the only ship that can reliably stop air attacks are fighter loadouts on American carriers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
576 posts
1,158 battles

I'm pretty sure even Michael Phelps can't go 20kts. 

 

You are now required to prove it.

 

After all, this is the internet.  I find your lack of sarcasm disturbing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,471
[SWFSH]
[SWFSH]
Volunteer Moderator
2,629 posts
7,415 battles

You are now required to prove it.

 

After all, this is the internet.  I find your lack of sarcasm disturbing.

According to a quick google search Michael Phelps goes 7.1km/h or 3.83kts. Arkansas Beta is way faster.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
395
[DRACS]
Supertester, In AlfaTesters
879 posts
4,971 battles

There's rumored to be an Arkansas 1919 file in the new patch, so perhaps the hull is being upgraded to a mid-point between the Stock Wyoming (what the Ark is now) and the 1942 refit the Wyoming recieves.

 

Actually, Ark 1919 sounds exactly like what I was requesting in another thread in the suggestions forum for the Beta Ship.  :great:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
537 posts
2,625 battles

One thing I noticed on the test server, is the stock Wyoming seems to be getting a few 3" AA guns. Maybe Arkansas will too...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,337 battles

Guys we have to realize, Arkansas was launched in the WW1 era before planes and AA was a thing. Not shocking her AA is crap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
576 posts
1,158 battles

According to a quick and unnecessary google search Michael Phelps goes 7.1km/h or 3.83kts. Arkansas Beta is way faster.  But nobody cares, because this wasn't about that, it was about the sarcasm, humor, and how silly it is to correct people who are just exaggerating for style.

 

Why are you all looking at me like that?  What did I say?

 

There, fixed it for you.

Edited by Hans_Von_Lohman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
332
Beta Testers
2,580 posts
4,750 battles

I actually have only very rarely been focused by CVs in mine.

AA really just makes some pew pew sounds for most ships until Omaha/Cleveland.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,471
[SWFSH]
[SWFSH]
Volunteer Moderator
2,629 posts
7,415 battles

What was that?  Sorry I legitimately enjoyed your research and care to detail to answer random people's questions. Thanks for your attention to detail and masters degree in the art of "Google-fu".  I look forward to meeting you again in the future, oh wise one - Teruzuki the great.

 

Please notice my prayers. 

What is this supposed to mean?

 

(I had too much fun typing that up.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,890
[-K--]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
8,179 posts
10,923 battles

is free ship, premiums in general are worse the their normal types.  No AA for free premiums because balance.

 

Except fully equipped Arkansas is better than Wyoming, which is a good ship by itself. Lack of AA (which is at best mediocre on a fully upgraded Wyoming) is nothing compared to tighter salvos, better concealment, better secondaries, better income, better matchmaking, and the ability to put any captain in the Beta.

 

If someone sold the Arkansas that person is a foolish fool I tell ya.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,765
[-K-]
Supertest Coordinator, Alpha Tester, WoWS Community Contributors, Wiki Editor
6,629 posts
29,072 battles

Guys we have to realize, Arkansas was launched in the WW1 era before planes and AA was a thing. Not shocking her AA is crap.

 

St Louis has AA.  Launched before WW1...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
901 posts
12,833 battles

I have to honestly agree to some point.. but my issue with the Arkansas is when in a fight I am not able to shoot the other ships due to range.. I would rather have some slight range buffs to the arkansas. I am usually 1.8 km short on range to be effective for shooting.

 

 

invest in the range and accuracy upgrades and it's a very good ship. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×