Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
pathbuster

So MM decided to set the teams up this way yesterday~

2 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
31 posts
1,002 battles

GOrrVWo.jpg

If it was just the t9 Essex on their team, fine~ but he gets the support of another t7 CV.

2 t7 bbs on their side (Rado doesn't count...but still)

we had 1 extra t8 CA and an extra cleveland

they had a t8 dd with 2 t6 dd backups while we got 2 t7 dds

 

now I know we had a slight fail division on our team so that probably screwed the match setup a bit....but still~ the result of this game was a massacre...we lost 5:10~

 

so when's the MM-fix patch coming? after PAX?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
611
[SYN]
Members
2,861 posts
10,456 battles

ouch, mm screw big time. but I will say, this isnt a fail division though, all the people within the division are very close in tier. fail divisions are when you get people four tiers apart teaming up, like a wyoming divisioning with an iowa, or worse, my first match in ym iowa, someone on the other team, a T7 player was divisioned with an eerie, and another T7 player divisioned with a myogi. Needless to say, did not go well for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
768 posts

Matchmaking for CVs is just weird right now...

 

 

I've had four games today where my Essex got paired against a Ranger. Solo. :amazed:

 

Funnily enough, when I was grinding the Ranger, I could never recall fighting anything worse than a Lexington or a Shokaku.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×