Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
suleiman71

Will the Myoko still be viable?

17 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

-Members-
6,960 posts
10,623 battles

Since the Myoko's RoF and turret traverse are recieving an overkill of a nerf to 4.3 and 40 seconds something, will the ship still be viable to grind to? It really only needed nerfed to 4.5-4.6 rpm.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
233
[-CGK-]
Members
1,158 posts
858 battles

IMO, I have seen the ship in battle, never played it. But it looks like a good ship and seems to be well rounded, I gotta say even with a ROF nerf the ship would still be doing good. Even against me until I get some better Tiers.

 

*cough* compared to a BB that is with our fire rate Lool :trollface:

Edited by HerrCommandant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
-Members-
6,960 posts
10,623 battles

it will still be better than ibuki

 

The real Ibuki was planned as a slightly improved Mogami. The thing needs a buff IMO.
Edited by ShermanMedium

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
637
[THICC]
Beta Testers
1,252 posts
8,316 battles

I don't particularly enjoy Myoko as she is.  I think she will be frustrating to play after the nerfs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
642 posts

Who the hell thought it needed a nerf? It's perfectly balanced. This is an idiotic move, that no one even called for. Meanwhile the Cleavland isn't touched.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
-Members-
6,960 posts
10,623 battles

Who the hell thought it needed a nerf? It's perfectly balanced. This is an idiotic move, that no one even called for. Meanwhile the Cleavland isn't touched.

 

The Cleveland has already been nerfed to hell, it's fine from the who knows how many matches I've played in it now. It rightfully belongs in t8 with its 10rpm and realistic AA. Brooklyn with 6-7rpm at t7, Fargo at t9, and Worcester 10.
Edited by ShermanMedium
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,080
Alpha Tester
6,683 posts
3,338 battles

 

The Cleveland has already been nerfed to hell

And yet in my experience playing CVs, Clevelands are still designated no-fly zones because they have enough AA guns to take down a B-52 and they have that ridiculous catapult fighter circling around like a hawk waiting to strike on a mouse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,063
[-K--]
Beta Testers
4,890 posts
15,173 battles

No, it won't. It doesn't need a nerf at all. Pensacola needs a buff instead.

 

Buffed Pensacola would be scary...its already very good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,471
[SALVO]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
6,610 posts
7,430 battles

The ibuki is a drastically overpriced turd ..spent 25 mil upgrading it to meh status..sold it for an amagi....no regrets

 

The myoko is a great ship...I'll still keep it and rule with it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
376
[S_E_A]
Beta Testers
2,709 posts
4,566 battles

The nerf doesn't sound too bad. An extra 2 seconds on the reload IIRC. My money is on it still being viable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
113
[P_P]
Beta Testers
631 posts
7,704 battles

They need to make turret rotate faster, I don't mind the RoF nerf cuz it's not that bad but Myoko turret still turn the slowest out of all 203.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
424
[A-D-F]
Members
2,309 posts
8,150 battles

 

Buffed Pensacola would be scary...its already very good.

Range buff would be nice - it's made of glass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×