Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
rolex575

Ban submarine threads

14 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
301 posts
400 battles

Because we've had enough. And this is not a "joke thread", I'm serious. So answer the poll and bring forth your arguments.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
844 posts
382 battles

ban them and give me a squirt gun for a cannon on their ships starts for a day then they make another sub thread the time increases!!!!


 

:playing:


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26
[KMR]
Members
168 posts
4,122 battles

Wargaming said that they are now considering subs. Also if we ban this, why not just ban, new ship speculation, fan art, ship complaining, torpedoes and crying about MM threads while we're at it.:sceptic: NO neg rep, but please think about before you post. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
944 posts
2,251 battles

no it shouldn't be banned, don't like it don't read it, banning threads simply because we're not likelty to see it would be stupid. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
130
[BB_59]
Members
855 posts
3,427 battles

No, because nobody is cool if they think they are mature and intelligent because they ridicule players who suggest submarine related content.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
139
[OJITT]
Beta Testers
521 posts
3,221 battles

Wargaming said that they are now considering subs. Also if we ban this, why not just ban, new ship speculation, fan art, ship complaining, torpedoes and crying about MM threads while we're at it.:sceptic: NO neg rep, but please think about before you post. 

 

This

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
449 posts

If they are going to allow DDs to play in a role they never once did in reality, then I think submarines would be perfect for the game and actually probably weak when compared to DDs and CVs as they likely wouldn't last very long. It would definitely provide an interesting new game mechanic in order to force players to use strategy instead of random-death-match playstyle.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
301 posts
400 battles

If they are going to allow DDs to play in a role they never once did in reality, then I think submarines would be perfect for the game and actually probably weak when compared to DDs and CVs as they likely wouldn't last very long. It would definitely provide an interesting new game mechanic in order to force players to use strategy instead of random-death-match playstyle.

 

 

But DDs have at least one advantage: speed. While submarines, when surfaced, barely move as fast as those USN "Standards" BBs. And most players in the game playing DDs aren't interested in playing ASW. If you really want subs, play Silent Hunter. And if you still think they should be included, see what they did to Navy Field (aka I think it lost more than half the players within a short time after introduction of subs).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
14 posts
763 battles

 

But DDs have at least one advantage: speed. While submarines, when surfaced, barely move as fast as those USN "Standards" BBs. And most players in the game playing DDs aren't interested in playing ASW. If you really want subs, play Silent Hunter. And if you still think they should be included, see what they did to Navy Field (aka I think it lost more than half the players within a short time after introduction of subs).

 

I dunno man, I play DD's because its the closest thing I can GET to a sub right now. I'd LOVE to have one, it was the main reason I even got interested in WS over tanks, and was sad to see they didn't make it in. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, even you with ur "silent hunter" comment, are entitled to it. Some of us dont WANT to play silent hunter or navy field because we are addicted to WG Games lol,  bring on the underwater sub vs sub action imho! And lets avoid trying to "ban" someone else's opinion.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
69
[SNAP]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
153 posts
5,184 battles

Subs are an absolutely terrible idea and I'm sick of people asking for them.  Let's just put up a sticky saying "subs aren't gonna happen" and just delete all the threads asking for them, and be done with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
135 posts
5,069 battles

no it shouldn't be banned, don't like it don't read it, banning threads simply because we're not likelty to see it would be stupid. 

 

I agree. As much as I love submarines, I don't think they would fit into this game. If people want to make threads on it, fine. Banning it is a bit much though. People should be allowed to express their opinion. Censorship on opinions that are not obscene, offensive, or insulting would be going too far.
Edited by Admiral8Q

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×