Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Arcolin06

BB West Virginia, a Premium proposal

21 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

46
[ARGNT]
Beta Testers
80 posts
7,359 battles

Since Suggestion is closed for new topics, thought I'd drop this here.  If it's a mistake, my apologies.

 

I'm interested in getting the 1944 version of the USS West Virginia (BB 48) represented in game.  I think the ship has an interesting enough history and enough difference in performance from the USS Colorado (prewar) version currently in game to make it an interesting variant.  Plus, with the clipper bow, single funnel, sleek twin 16" turrets and modernized secondary armament she was (in my opinion) one of the better looking US BBs.

 

The Colorado Class US BB takes a lot of flak, much of it for good reason. She's generally considered an underperforming ship.  Aside from typically poor US top speed, her 16" guns have worse than usual gun performance due to dispersion and slow rate of fire.  Why on earth would you want another version of an underperforming ship?

 

The West Virginia '44 was a very different ship from the one that sank at Pearl.  Arguably she had the most extensive rebuild of any Pearl veteran, or indeed of any of any of her Colorado Class sisters.  When she sailed to the Philippines she was equipped with modern Mark 8 fire control, her AA armament  was radically improved, and her barrette guns were replaced by the 5" dual purpose turrets ubiquitous to the North Carolina, South Dakota and Iowa class BBs.  She received all new propulsion and was modestly uparmored, including improved torpedo protection.

 

The net result was a ship with similar main armament firepower compared to the Colorados, but the Mark 8 provided much better fire control.  She was also the only Colorado which got the entire complement of 16x5" 38 caliber secondaries in turrets as planned.  Overall her artillery rating in WoWS should be a modest increase over the Colorado, but no match for the 9x16" mains and 20x5" the North Carolina carries; her accuracy should be comparable to the NC, as she demonstrated with her initial salvo at Suriago Strait.

 

WeeVee's AA complement was impressive, with her 16 dual purpose five inchers supplemented by 40 Bofors and 50 Oerlikon mounts.  That's considerably better than NC's 20x5", 15x Bofors and 46x Oerlikon mounts.

 

On the downside, the rebuilt WeeVee rode low in the water; while she was capable of design speeds with her new propulsion system she was known for being sluggish.  

 

In game terms what do we have?  Well, she'd have to be a Premium ship.  Aside from the fact that WeeVee is the only vessel who received a complete upgrade post-Pearl, making her unique, her performance falls somewhere between the Colorados and the North Carolina.

 

With her improved gun performance and vastly improved AA West Virginia couldn't be a Tier VII like the parent Colorado Class.  She'd have to be a Tier VIII alongside the NC.

 

With weaker artillery and worse speed/agility than NC the WeeVee would have to have something to make people actually want to buy the thing.  What then?

 

I would propose that the WeeVee be a US Tier VIII long range gunner.  Historically the WeeVee won the 'Meatball' Battle Efficiency Pennant in 1925, 1927, 1932 and 1937.  She also won the America Defense Cup and the Spokane Cup for short range gunnery.  She was one of the first recipients of the RCA CXAM-1 radar and was outfitted with the Mark 8 system after her post-Pearl rebuild.  As Rear Admiral Oldendorf's flag at Suriago Strait, leading a Battleship Division of six BBs (including four veterans of Pearl Harbor) she acquired the Yamashiro at 42'000 yards, had a firing solution at 30,000 yards and opened fire at 22,800 yards, hitting Yamashiro with five of her first six salvos.  She fired sixteen salvos over 22 minutes, a very respectable rate of fire for a rebuilt Standard BB.

 

The Yamashiro, and all of Nishimura's TF, were wrecked in the world's last BB vs BB engagement.  The WeeVee was not only the US flag, but was a star performer. (Not to diminish the role of the DDs and PT boats that opened the engagement!)

 

Based on this and the need to make WeeVee a viable buy I'd propose that she have a slightly higher rate of fire than North Carolina, but lower artillery rating.  Turret turn should match Colorado, but accuracy and gun range should be a better than NC to reflect her history of gunnery excellence.  AA should be significantly better than NC, but agility should be noticeably worse, both to reflect history and to encourage players to use her as a long range gunnery platform instead of a brawler.

 

Given my love for the ship I may well be biased, so comments and critiques are welcome.  Would you buy such a ship if offered?

 

I hope WG takes notice of this historic, pretty ship.

  • Cool 19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
116
[Y0L0K]
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
621 posts
13,205 battles

I like this a lot. Well thought out, and detailed. I support many of these claims, and retro-fit ships should still qualify, especially considering her age.... +1, nyaa~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46
[ARGNT]
Beta Testers
80 posts
7,359 battles

Appreciate it, Kari.  Any advice is welcome, especially on how to get it considered by WG.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
42 posts
480 battles

+1'd ya.  Great post and I agree.  More ships can't be a bad thing.  Expanding the game one ship at a time.  o7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
2 posts
6,726 battles

Excellent post.  I just noticed that the current in-game ship looks like a refit Maryland.  I'd really like to see a 1944 refit WeeVee as a premium.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
164
[WALLY]
Beta Testers
1,413 posts
1,450 battles

I don't see anything that would/should be a problem.  Your info is factually sound, your tier placement and role of the ship is also sound.

 

I support this 110%!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,651
[CVRME]
[CVRME]
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters
2,942 posts
10,662 battles

+1, nice idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46
[WBLDG]
Beta Testers
373 posts
4,121 battles

Interesting ship, definitely reminds me of the 1930s rebuilds of the Queen E class that left the WWI veterans pretty well prepared for WWII.

I'm somewhat reluctant about seeing a 1920s era ship, rebuild or no, at tier 8 though. I think it might be worth considering swapping places and having this build represent the final upgrade for the Colorado class and have a pre-Pearl Colorado config as the premium at tier 7.

 

This would also fit with what seems likely to happen with the Queen E class. The Warspite, grand old lady that she may be, didn't receive the penultimate refit for the class which was received by the Valiant and the Queen Elizabeth where the smattering of modern secondaries afforded the Warspite are replaced by 10x2 QF 4.5" which is likely to represent the final upgrade for the Queen E class once the tree is in.

 

Obviously there's a lot of uncertainty on both ends but I'd consider the Warspite a good guide for how Wargaming wants to treat 'famous' ships vs classes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
528
[ERN]
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters
1,322 posts

well thought out proposal...too bad WG doesn't give a phlyingphuk we the players actually think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters
703 posts
345 battles

I would prefer it if the W. Virginia's rebuild was a module upgrade to the Colorado.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,337 battles

I would prefer it if the W. Virginia's rebuild was a module upgrade to the Colorado.

 

Damn it Ninja'd. But my thoughts exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[SEA4]
[SEA4]
Members
1 post
1,100 battles

I sincerely hope they do this. I'd buy WeeVee immediately and I'd never play anything else

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,242
[NDA]
Beta Testers
5,251 posts
8,905 battles

dat bump and yes i'd buy it 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,513
Members
16,315 posts
12,285 battles

10/10 I would buy, The US line needs a Premium BB and from your post the WV sounds quirky enough to excel in some things but struggle in others, which is what most Premiums do. Plus you could throw on this song when you are playing her

 

Edited by slak96u

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
271 posts
3,462 battles

WeeVee should be the final hull for the Colorado. Making the Current Colorado a premium however is not such a good idea. No one likes the ship and its free... who the hell is gonna buy it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
73 posts
16,333 battles

West Virginia or the Washington would  be one of the two premium BB's I would like to see. I go back and forth between the two trying to decide which I would prefer. I suppose some might argue for the refit Tennessee twins, but I still lean towards West Virginia or Washington. Good post. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×