"Matchmaker is performing as wanted" - RU devs

[Monarchco]

[Red_Raven_168]

did you enjoy the game

[Special_Kay]

Heh. How many ships did the Taiho sink on the first attack run?

[Dr_Venture]

Sky-cancer

[FarVision]

Sure.  Do the math.  

[commander_cheef]

it was the faill-toon with the bogue that messed up the battle. . .

 

MM tried to balance it with a better CV but with less ships. 

 

it is just what happens when they are not that many people at high tiers.

[Red_Raven_168]

it was the faill-toon with the bogue

 

look again

 

5 phail-toons

[PaladinRyan]

To be fair they did admit that it might have issues with the lower population at high and middle tiers until more players get to those ships. That said I completely agree that MM is awful in general right now, especially with carrier allocation. MM loves using bottom tier BBs to balance the points as well despite the fact that BBs are not especially strong at the moment (cruisers and carriers are stronger in general). The worst case scenario for me is when you have a carrier imbalance that MM decides can be fixed by giving the team with less carrier power a bunch of battleships which are the most vulnerable to carriers. Seriously, give me top tier cruisers and destroyers in that situation. They will help way more than those two extra bottom tier battleships. MM could be worse and I expect it will improve as tiers and classes become more populated but some issues seem to go beyond that to me.

[Monarchco]

did you enjoy the game

 

Actually yes. We only lost 4 ships(I posted this before starting the battle). 

All 3 BB's on our team got Dreadnought, & the Taiho got High cal, confederate, & first blood.

And I managed to grab 2 kills myself for a total of 4900 exp on my Atago. So it wasn't bad(for our team).

 

 

 

 

 

I just think that MM should be a little more patient to try and prevent stuff like this.

 

So a little less focus on queue time, and a little more focus on balance.