500k+ dmg round with Hakuryu Patch 3.1.3

[Sfaquin]

The german gamer Papedipupi just did a battle with 508k~ dmg in his Hakuryu CV scoring nearly 1million credits.

 

Just wanted to let you guys know.

 

http://www.twitch.tv/papedipupi/c/6793930

[Edsgarth]

But did he do it while AFK getting pizza and beer?

[Fastwolf66]

The german gamer Papedipupi just did a battle with 508k~ dmg in his Hakuryu CV scoring nearly 1million credits.

 

Just wanted to let you guys know.

 

http://www.twitch.tv/papedipupi/c/6793930

 

Just fought 3 battles against that thing... with an essex, fully upgraded fighters and captain... and their TBs are almost inmune to intercept. Way too fast. 4 TB squadrons, 2 TD squadrons. IF intercepted, they are fragile, but damn too fast. Not fair at all, again too much difference between tiers.

 

And of course, completely lethal. 4 TB inbound, intercepted before the run. killed 1 before, 2 more on the retreat. that means 15 fish on the water, against a DEFENDED aircapped BB, and a total loss of 4 airplanes (one by AA). After shooting down one squadron, the three remaining were way too far and out of reach, doing barely my fighters speed.

 

Completely unfair, almost ridicule, TOP TIER american fighters cannot intercept TBs

[Sfaquin]

What I find more interesting is the attacks of the torpedo bomber squadrons. There is just now way to dodge. If your aim is at least good the Battleship takes at least 75% of the hits. No way of escaping. If he had aimed a bit better with his first attack he couldve "oneshot" that Ship. Without the enemy player having ANY kind of way to take ANY kind of countermeasure.

 

The survivability of these squads is another problem altogether. As well as the speed.

[SAR_K9]

T9 v T10 is supposed to be an 'even' match, now?  did Barrage stop working?  Did the TB not slow down during their attack run if they were under CAP attack, making them more susceptible to AA fire?  Did the already wide spread not go wider when they were under attack?

[SAR_K9]

Seriously, T10 carrier up against 8 BBs with only 3CA and no enemy CV?  How could it NOT be a slaughter.  Blame MM.  That's like Christmas and your birthday all wrapped up into one.

[Apokita]

what a slaughter mygod

IJN CVs on a nutshell right

[Sfaquin]

Seriously, T10 carrier up against 8 BBs with only 3CA and no enemy CV?  How could it NOT be a slaughter.  Blame MM.  That's like Christmas and your birthday all wrapped up into one.

 

Why not see it this way: If an Yamato had this influence in the game just because of it being the only Tier 10 Battleship in a battle with Tier 10 CA´/DDs and other Tier 8 BBs. What would happen? The forums would be spamed with whinethreads.

 

What if the enemy Team has a carrier with the exact same setup? Would you be ok with being just some kind of "on the go snack" while they both sling out who sinks more ships while only in the end turning against each other?  Would it be ok for an T10 BB sinking everything in its site as long as it is not another T10 BB ?

 

Why should it be different for carriers? Is the AA on the ships just there for decorative purposes? If the carrier makes the game, just because there isnt another one at the enemy side. Flak is pretty much obsolete.

I know some people love their carriers. But Id like to see their reaction if Wargimg would declare one ship class to be "the one to rule them all" which is not a carrier.

 

[rocketdrive]

 

Why not see it this way: If an Yamato had this influence in the game just because of it being the only Tier 10 Battleship in a battle with Tier 10 CA´/DDs and other Tier 8 BBs. What would happen? The forums would be spamed with whinethreads.

 

 

actually no cause multiple Tier 8 bb's can in fact hold a fight against a single tier 10 bb, not to mention how easy tier 10 dd's can ruin tier 10 bbs. atleast you tried carrier main. 

 

 

 

What if the enemy Team has a carrier with the exact same setup? Would you be ok with being just some kind of "on the go snack" while they both sling out who sinks more ships while only in the end turning against each other?  Would it be ok for an T10 BB sinking everything in its site as long as it is not another T10 BB ?

 

 

again, implying battleships have infinite range and can oneshot ships of equivalent tier within the first 3 minutes. 

 

 

Why should it be different for carriers? Is the AA on the ships just there for decorative purposes? If the carrier makes the game, just because there isnt another one at the enemy side. Flak is pretty much obsolete.

I know some people love their carriers. But Id like to see their reaction if Wargimg would declare one ship class to be "the one to rule them all" which is not a carrier.

 

***** which means carriers dominate cause that's what they did in ww2. 

 

[content moderated - personal abuse]
- Yshoneist

[Pyrofiend]

 

because asshats like you keep crying for "historicaly accurate" gameplay, which means carriers dominate cause that's what they did in ww2. 

 

Do you have to insult people in every thread and post that you make? Really man?

[rocketdrive]

 

Do you have to insult people in every thread and post that you make? Really man?

 

because silence of the lambs is how we solve all the problems right?

[Numbah18]

Tier 9 and 10 CV are supposed to have been given to a small amount of people so they can be balanced. Expect to see them tweaked at some point. 

[1HandTiedBehindMyBack]

Just to add just had 1 destroy our team, 6 kills and nothing we could do to even dent his planes.  Not even and Iowa with 2 tier 8 cruiser escort could stop him, planes were so fast he could be in to torp and bomb before we could dent his planes.