Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Snoopys_Odyssey

Shikishima Made Irrelevant By Satsuma?

5 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,680
[WHIPI]
Members
1,604 posts
18,727 battles

Is it currently worth the steel to get the Shikishima?  

 

What is the difference between the two?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,966
[ARS]
Beta Testers
8,340 posts
9,621 battles

Shikishima has a higher rate of fire, better accuracy outside of the special firing mode for Satsuma, better AA, better secondaries, better rudder shift, smaller turning circle and better economics.

  • Cool 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertester, Members, Wiki Editor
690 posts
13,735 battles

one earns you credits and you can put any commander on, the other barely or doesn't earn you credits and acts like a tech tree ship when it comes to commanders. among other things

Edited by The_Ruleset_Difference
  • Cool 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
635
[THICC]
Beta Testers
1,250 posts
8,316 battles
1 hour ago, Snoopys_Odyssey said:

Is it currently worth the steel to get the Shikishima?  

 

What is the difference between the two?

Shikishima will be matched against another tier X ship.  Satsuma will be matched against a supership.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
96 posts
83 battles

 

5 hours ago, Snoopys_Odyssey said:

Is it currently worth the steel to get the Shikishima?  

 

What is the difference between the two?

Superships make all tech tree ships obsolete, as long as you have the credits to enjoy them (i.e. are rich).

They're the closest thing to premium ammo yet.

  • Cool 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×