Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
LupusMalum

Looking past the Petropavlovsk [edited] ""nerf""

15 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

366
[WNNR]
[WNNR]
Members
486 posts
21,537 battles

On the before and after pictures on the 11.3 information on the Petropavlovsk. The before the picture is more distant and the after picture is much closer. Wonder why WG made that ""ethical"" choice ?

 

notice on the other ships pictures WG is able to use the same camera angle

 

https://worldofwarships.com/en/news/game-updates/update-0113-italian-destroyers-part-2/

 

WG edited the letters B S

Edited by LupusMalum
  • Meh 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertester, Members, Wiki Editor
690 posts
13,735 battles

I don’t see the issue with it? Even if it isn’t an exact same angle of the before and after you can clearly see the rust line of where the ship had its old waterline and where it is for the update 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
679
[-GF-]
Beta Testers
1,294 posts
12,915 battles

You can obviously see the Petro sits up higher out of the water. so it is a nerf. So what are you talking about? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,365
[PROJX]
Beta Testers
1,735 posts
6,718 battles

The different angle is questionable, couldn't they just set the camera to the idle position to compare?

Regardless, it's still visible, albeit an extremely small change.

Edited by PotatoMD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
366
[WNNR]
[WNNR]
Members
486 posts
21,537 battles
2 minutes ago, The_Ruleset_Difference said:

I don’t see the issue with it? Even if it isn’t an exact same angle of the before and after you can clearly see the rust line of where the ship had its old waterline and where it is for the update 

The picture is not the same distance so  the  after picture being closer exaggerates the nerf

1 minute ago, Copperhead550 said:

You can obviously see the Petro sits up higher out of the water. so it is a nerf. So what are you talking about? 

The nerf is  exaggerated by the picture being at a closer distance 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
270
[KRAK]
Members
1,947 posts
19,352 battles
5 minutes ago, The_Ruleset_Difference said:

I don’t see the issue with it? Even if it isn’t an exact same angle of the before and after you can clearly see the rust line of where the ship had its old waterline and where it is for the update 

Second picture is her sailing the Great Salt Lake, the 1st in Lake Michigan.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
366
[WNNR]
[WNNR]
Members
486 posts
21,537 battles
2 minutes ago, Ericson38 said:

Second picture is her sailing the Great Salt Lake, the 1st in Lake Michigan.

that has nothing to do with maintaining the same angle on the before and after pictures

  • Boring 1
  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,605
[CAAT]
Members
6,270 posts
8,034 battles
16 minutes ago, LupusMalum said:

On the before and after pictures on the 11.3 information on the Petropavlovsk. The before the picture is more distant and the after picture is much closer. Wonder why WG made that ""ethical"" choice ?

 

notice on the other ships pictures WG is able to use the same camera angle

 

https://worldofwarships.com/en/news/game-updates/update-0113-italian-destroyers-part-2/

 

WG edited the letters B S

The Petro nerf is a SMALL change, but it IS visible. There is nothing concerning here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
270
[KRAK]
Members
1,947 posts
19,352 battles
32 minutes ago, LupusMalum said:

that has nothing to do with maintaining the same angle on the before and after pictures

Look, I have one, it was a joke. Ships float higher in higher density water (like cold and or salty).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,562
[O_O]
Members
7,895 posts
22,089 battles
1 hour ago, LupusMalum said:

that has nothing to do with maintaining the same angle on the before and after pictures

Your rage on this particular matter is amusing, at best.

Pick your fights, my man.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,374
[DRFTR]
Beta Testers
7,757 posts

its a big ship they raised it less than 2ft, how obvious did you expect it to be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17,296
[WOLF5]
[WOLF5]
Members
38,161 posts
30,915 battles

It's hardly much of a change.  The freeboard is still so low that the ship should be classified as a submarine and issued a periscope.

The freeboard is so low that the only waters safe enough for her to sail in is a bathtub.

Edited by HazeGrayUnderway
  • Cool 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×