Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Oldschool_Gaming_YT

Datamined Dutch cruiser armor

10 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,883
[-BCO-]
Members
3,981 posts
10,999 battles

Well, Lert gonna be happy...

  • Funny 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39,298
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
27,735 posts
26,574 battles
10 minutes ago, Bandi73 said:

Well, Lert gonna be happy...

Line of thicc bois. T8 armor looks especially beefy for the tier. All those layers will be blank voids for AP shells.

  • Funny 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,528
Members
4,274 posts
4,649 battles

Flamu looking at the ship's armour on the PTS isn't exactly a datamine :P

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
181
[ENDO]
Members
353 posts
8,272 battles

Good looking ships. They just look beautiful. Unsure how I feel about the bomber gimmick but we shall see. They look like exactly the kind of ships I like. Beefy cruisers that can get in and cover DDs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
767 posts
19,884 battles

Guh, Leeuw's armor is allllll wrong and wonky. Frustrating.

Spoiler

BC19.png

 

It's funny how annoyed flamu gets about the impact on 380-406mm BBs, when Leeuw literally has her side armor buffed and citadel slopes nerfed specifically to not give 431+ BBs an advantage over 380-406, but I suppose historical accuracy only matters to him when he can use it to call a German ship bad.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17,317
[WOLF5]
[WOLF5]
Members
38,200 posts
30,952 battles
1 hour ago, Kingpin61 said:

Guh, Leeuw's armor is allllll wrong and wonky. Frustrating.

  Hide contents

BC19.png

 

It's funny how annoyed flamu gets about the impact on 380-406mm BBs, when Leeuw literally has her side armor buffed and citadel slopes nerfed specifically to not give 431+ BBs an advantage over 380-406, but I suppose historical accuracy only matters to him when he can use it to call a German ship bad.

We're talking about the same WG that has 50mm hull armor on Kahabarovsk LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
767 posts
19,884 battles
33 minutes ago, HazeGrayUnderway said:

We're talking about the same WG that has 50mm hull armor on Kahabarovsk LOL

Even in that case, significant armor was the main feature of Pr. 47 and Pr. 24, the destroyer projects which were mixed to create Khaba

 

(and before someone asks, yes, there was a Pr. 24 DL, the soviets reused project numbers a fair bit, which is EXTREMELY annoying when researching)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,856
[PVE]
Members
1,197 posts
2 hours ago, MBRicochet said:

 Unsure how I feel about the bomber gimmick but we shall see.

Maybe it's a prelude for more offboard aircraft assets in the future -- like USAAF bombers carrying 10ton grand slams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×