Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
db4100

It is about time.....Really looking forward to this

20 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

2,894
[WOLF5]
Supertester
4,851 posts
4,290 battles

I think you're confusing the French with the Italians...:Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,099
[WOLFC]
Members
2,354 posts
Quote

If the waiting time spent by the first player in the queue exceeds 3 minutes, teams might be filled with bots with improved AI, mastered commander's skills, and mounted camouflages and signals. 

oooooooooo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
250 posts
1,475 battles

Shouldn’t the Swedish ships just sail blithely around the map not getting involved?

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,099
[WOLFC]
Members
2,354 posts
16 minutes ago, HMS_Hoodwink said:

Shouldn’t the Swedish ships just sail blithely around the map not getting involved?

Well they could shovel iron at both sides.....

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
497
[XXII]
Banned
862 posts
989 battles

Wasn't this the idea of a certain player? WG IS listening!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
403
[IMP]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
456 posts
6,268 battles
1 minute ago, DuckyShot said:

Axis side not at any disadvantage whatsoever. 

Even their absolute best DD can be easily countered by Cossack. Yeah, I think testing it in Tier VIII is a mistake, they should definitely lower it to Tier V or Tier VI where all nations have a solid number of existing ships, and there are no unfair balance issues like no radar vs radar.

Take the same rules to Tier X and the Axis would literally have just three ships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,333
[-K-]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
7,700 posts
10,145 battles

These battles should be legitimate PvP or PvE scenarios, and not just Randoms with different ship nationalities for each team. But it sounds like it's the latter? If so, pass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
7,382 posts
17,441 battles
4 minutes ago, Torenico said:

Even their absolute best DD can be easily countered by Cossack. Yeah, I think testing it in Tier VIII is a mistake, they should definitely lower it to Tier V or Tier VI where all nations have a solid number of existing ships, and there are no unfair balance issues like no radar vs radar.

Take the same rules to Tier X and the Axis would literally have just three ships.

Well cossack counters pretty much all dds at t8 and most t9 dds, so that isn't saying much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,099
[WOLFC]
Members
2,354 posts

If the Cossack can find the Asashio, sure but this is 12 v 12

Edited by Anonymous50

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
452
[KAPPA]
Members
1,448 posts
8,165 battles

Looks really darn lopsided as far as available ships go, they really should be doing this at a tier where every nation has a BB, a CA/CL, and a DD, that or at least make a change that allows ships that were laid down, but not completed (looking squarely at Amagi with that one). Radar is going to be an issue as well I'd think. Also, why the heck are we letting the Swedes and Pan-Asian ships in? Sweden attempted to be as neutral as possible and the Pan-Asian ships were either not built, serving in the USN or even the IJN for Fenyang. If they are to be present at all, I suggest the PA boats be options for both sides.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,487
[SALVO]
Members
7,098 posts
5,556 battles
41 minutes ago, Torenico said:

Even their absolute best DD can be easily countered by Cossack. Yeah, I think testing it in Tier VIII is a mistake, they should definitely lower it to Tier V or Tier VI where all nations have a solid number of existing ships, and there are no unfair balance issues like no radar vs radar.

Take the same rules to Tier X and the Axis would literally have just three ships.

Otoh if they make it work at T8, it will work at lower tiers, T8+ is kinda the sore spot for Historic battles. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,487
[SALVO]
Members
7,098 posts
5,556 battles

IMO, French, Italians, Soviets and Swedes should be randomly switching sides on a per match base.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,495
[BNKR]
[BNKR]
Members
2,823 posts
2,663 battles
1 hour ago, DuckyShot said:

Axis side not at any disadvantage whatsoever. 

Oh god, this looks imbalanced as all hell.  Why would anyone want to play as Axis?  No radar, worse BBs, only 1 fairly effective DD? No 16 inch guns for the Axis? Only 1 light cruiser?  How is this supposed to work?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,099
[WOLFC]
Members
2,354 posts
4 minutes ago, CaptainKaitoGhost said:

Oh god, this looks imbalanced as all hell.  Why would anyone want to play as Axis?  No radar, worse BBs, only 1 fairly effective DD? No 16 inch guns for the Axis? Only 1 light cruiser?  How is this supposed to work?

The ultimate test of whether its the keyboard jockey or the pixel that wins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
967
Members
2,070 posts
12,694 battles

I think tiers 6 & 7 would be a lot better for this, both for balance and history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,487
[SALVO]
Members
7,098 posts
5,556 battles
53 minutes ago, CaptainKaitoGhost said:

Why would anyone want to play as Axis?  

Wehraboo + Weeaboo power!! Clearly an OP alliance... there won't be lack of players ready to re-enact history. 

Even more, if these are meant to be historical battles you already know how the story ends, you just get to role play Narvik, North Cape or Leyte Gulf. After all we can't allow the Axis rewriting history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×