Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
hateboat

NA forum reacts to [RAIN]Sister analysis of Ashkance's reaction to Potatoe Quality's CV video

64 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

831
[-Y-]
Members
843 posts
61 battles

meme32-2.jpg

 


Analysis of Ahskance Reacts: Potato Quality's CV Video, by [RAIN] Sister

Discussion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYb-6unvk9k&feature=emb_title The video in question, The Analysis by [RAIN] Sister

Honestly... I'm slowly watching through the vod now of the reaction to PQ'd vid, but one thing that already kind of stands out to me is a point you make addressing the crossfire that PQ mentions. You don't call it a crossfire but a threat, I disagree with it, but thats more semantics than anything. The point I want to make however is that you compare the damage 5 ships will do to the potential of one. Yes taking 60k is probably not worse than going broadside to 5 ships (when excluding the dot damage a CV inflicts during or after that) but the problem lies in the fact that the CV can do this, regardless of many things in the game. you could call this a "vulnerable position" of course, it probably is, because being nose in against 5 ships is, usually a vulnerable position. This however does not mean that taking 60k of what is practically unavoidable damage is okay just because its the lesser evil.

the fact you call this "not massive damage" is also pretty amusing considering the fact you later call FDR drops as having "really high damage, 20k is a lot of damage" which is the exact amount you use in that example, which is a bit contradicting.

next up the whole element of surprise thing

in general when playing clan battles or any competitive modes where there is a homecap to be cap and a contested cap. Ranked is not really competitive since you still play with mongs but thats not important. You argue there is still an element of surprise. When playing in hurricane league, it will take some time for the enemy to cap their home cap, touch it or cap it. When you do a 7 push to one side without a CV the enemy team will know that this is happening due to your homecap not being contested. However, teams will just send 1 ship to cap the homecap when they want to do these things just to make sure this is not obvious. The best teams will realize that the cap is extremely late and probably be slightly more prepared for this possibility, but cant count on this. Even with a 5/2 split the element of surprise is there and if there is a DD on the 2 side it is impossible for the other team to know until they a play being made. Thus there is a lot of element of surprise, up to a solid 3-4 minutes, When the enemy team has already deployed into positions and (tries to) make(s) their own plays. However if you introduce a CV, this is not possible. After 45 seconds all deployments are known. He wont linger there forever no, but you have a 45 second window again before your new plans are revealed, if your intention was to bait. In any competitive setting this absolutely ruins any element of surprise and we all know it. That DD thats been unspotted for so long? can be found by CV, even more so by using the plane detection system to guess the possible location. That cruiser that's been unspotted for a while? CV can go spot it. It costs time, but its sooooo much easier for a CV to spot than it is for a DD to spend severeal minutes and risk its body than for a CV to fly over, look for 20 seconds and find said ship.

in randoms this usually doesnt matter too much, since deployment is not nearly as big of an issue as long as flanks are similarly balanced in terms of ship numbers, rather than ships themselves

the -50% air detection change is scrapped afaik

the argumentation on torpedoes hitting the bow/aft which is 50% healable and the torpbelt factoring this in is slightly flawed. Simply by saturating the bow or the aft you can already get -50% damage from torps taken there and then on top heal 50% of that already reduced damage. So then no, its not completely fair to say "its factored in" because its citadel damage and citadel cannot be saturated ever.

and then the whole "if you can citadel the BB thats nose in to your teammates it can be the damage your team needs to overcome that battleship" is referring back to the crossfire point that PQ makes.

also 2/3 fires is not uncommon at all for CV drops. 2 is not uncommon, quite the opposite. Usually when dropping with midway its a disappointment to get 1 fire instead of 2, rather than "yay I got 2 instead of 1". The expected result, is 2 fires. 3 is uncommon yes, but 2 is already enough to warrant dcp in most cases

the damage necessary on a BB to pop heal is about 30-40k 2 drops is more than enough to warrant that, unless its mainly cit damage, which is 90% permanent damage. However when talking about a cruiser, 1 drop is, in most cases, enough to force heal, and since most ships in competitive settings are cruisers... well...

also the thing that "who is setting the fires is not relevant, a BB can do the same" is not entirely fair either. Spotting comes into play again, since that might be a reason why you're getting focused in the first place, and the other thing is, yeah the conqueror can do the same, but the conqueror is far less likely to do so, and can be counterplayed much more easily by repositioning. Reverse behind that island, dodge the torps, pop the hydro to do so. Those tools dont exactly exist in the same fashion as they do for a CV strike in such a situation

also people DO call out plane losses in competitive.

honestly the mouse over the ship and "send fighters" is not a bad idea tbh

the DFAA thing is a bit ehh. I agree with the fact that, for RTS it has to be extreme to counter an extreme, but the current DFAA is still too weak. Give gearing back 300%, grozo too probably. and cruisers/other DDs/BBs to something like 150-250%

I do think however that it should be, in some way, easier for a CV to disengage if a target does use it.

the whole rock paper scissors game doesnt make a whole lot sense. This is because one counters the other but beats the other. But is like introducing an atom bomb in rock paper scissors atom bomb, where the atom bomb wins against every other possibility except itself. Yes you play differently without DDs/BBs/Cruisers whatever, but the problem is that a CV does what a DD can almost exclusively do, which is spot, also do what a BB can do, which is setup long range threat, while also providing heavy (DoT) damage like a cruiser. That is the fundamental flaw in comparing this to rock paper scissors. Its not like one of the classes inherently counter CVs and force the CV to play differently. Only the state of the game does that, not the composition of BB/CA/DD

well it forces the CV to play "differently" when there are few BBs but lots of DDs, but not nearly in the same way it would for the BB for instance

also comparing spotting to chess is not exactly a pristine analogy. This is an arcade game and 12v12, not 1v1 where 1 player controls so many things. A comparison to league is better, which actually does employ something extremely similar you described. Fog of War. Which does actually hide players and makes the game more tactical. Wouldn't be exactly fun if there was a champion that could suddenly reveal the entire map. I guess you can argue twisted fate does something similar, but its very short lasting and not often available, making its use far more niche than just that.

Yes O7 adapted to the venezia meta, they adapted to the T6 meta, as did every other top team that played those seasons, but VERY few of them actually enjoyed it. I talk with quite a lot of people. Mostly from EU because that's the region I play on, and I can tell you that the ratio of players in top clans that enjoyed those seasons more than the older seasons is smaller than 1/10, because I know of just 2 players who actually enjoyed it, and they were the CV mains themselves. 1 player out of 7. per team, but only 2 out of 30 per clan usually.

The whole "you can still play around concealment in a DD" is not exactly true. In a torpedoboat you want to be as close as possible to make sure your torpedostrikes land. If there is no radar threat its not uncommon for DD players to sit at 6-7km from their target. This is simply IMPOSSIBLE in a CV game, just out of fear of being lit by a CV that either randomly flies over or comes to actively spot you. It's just not possible ever, just because the CV decides that its going to spot you, you will die in such a position, while in a non CV game, as long as you are wary of the enemy DD's position (through means like teammates, map awareness and RPF) you can maintain that position, until its at risk. At which point you can (usually) still run away from said DD that is forcing you out. In which case you are forcing the enemy DD to come over and contest you and waste severeal minutes of his time. Now the counterargument will be one of 2 things. You have to sit further back in your DD to avoid this scenario is one of them. Well frankly that's the entire issue. You simply cannot ever play like this in a CV match, which means your effect goes down because you have to torp from further, because of the mere possibility the CV might spot you. The other argument is that you can run away or use smoke. Running away is not really viable as the CV is way faster than you could ever hope to be. Smoking will save you temporarily, but then the CV leaves a fighter on top, forcing you to stay there for 60 seconds or die, which allows the hydro ships to move in and kill you in time, because you are so close. The explanation just does. not. work.

so simplified: you have to sit at a range with your DD where you can mitigate the threat presented enough. This range is significantly increased when there is a CV present, even if said CV is not focusing you

you might argue about radar, but radar ships dont sail at you at 200 knots, you outrun radar cruisers, and outspot them. Usually. This is why stealth radar is bad for the game.

Island positioning is significantly weaker and maybe I missed it, but you didnt talk about it. Idk the vod sometimes lags out and doesnt let me skip back at some points. Anyway I do hope you atleast acknowledge that island play, which a lot of cruisers heavily rely on, is almost out of the window.

the reason PQ says "sniping at the back of the map" he doesnt mean actually the back of the map. its a bit similar to the DD explanation I just did. You have to play 1-3km further back sometimes because you simply cannot rely on going dark to disengage, which means you need more distance between you and them to mitigate the damage they can deal to you.

just going to skip the wot artillery, not interested in wot, dont care, never played

next up the 45% vs 70%. There was a pretty clear example. A clanmate of mine was streaming ([RAIN]) and Lulu was in the division. lulu has a 70% winrate. He got focused by a carrier in a match for multiple minutes straight in a DD, despite turning, dodging, juking, you name it. smoking whatever. The CV player is barely 50% winrate and new to the game (~1k battles). In no way would that same player have been able to impact the match this much by removing and during that time dying Lulu to play the entire game, in a surface ship, because very simply, more counterplay exists for this. It's just not possible for that same player to influence my clanmate's match by killing an extremely high impact player in the match like this in any other ship than a CV.

the whole "styling all over people with DD juking takes a LOT of skill and only a very small % of the playerbase is able to do this to a degree where its extremely consistent and constant. This simply doesn't go for me in a carrier styling on the enemy kurfurst with bombs and torps, or styling on the enemy DM with bombs and rockets. It's just not the same interaction and I'm pretty sure that I can't style on Lulu in a surface ship most of the time, but I can "style" on him in a CV. That is simply the reality.

its not about "the player with said winrate is able to touch me and thats why I dont respect it" If that same player is in a cruiser hitting me, thats acceptable damage, because I have active counterplay, or he simply did a good prediction. I can't completely dodge the CV, I can mitigate it. I can't completely dodge the spotting. I can't completely predict where the CV will drop and slow down or accelerate in time (not yet anyway, since that is/was in testing) It's simply the fact that a less skilled played does not need to use his brain in the same capacity the surface ship does to hit me. It's about said player simply being able to damage regardless of skill. You can mitigate so much damage from bad players if you are only skilled enough in most circumstances. Simply not the case for CVs because there is no real "aiming" to be done.

CV players being better only better in PR is also not true. Most crapplayers that have better stats in CVs also have better Winrate, usually by a couple %

the "its fine because im good at it" argument comes from the fact that, for a large majority, people who defend CVs, are generally only good in CVs and not very competent in other classes. Wait that reminds me of someone.....

honestly the fact you say "which side of the map do I have to piss on first" is [edited]hilarious. Almost directly admitting that CVs just crapon people by default regardless

not sure you can say that for any other class in the game

The thing is, what PQ said about positioning is true. Learning to aim and learning to shoot is not hard, it took me 500-1000 battles to figure that out. Positioning however is WAY harder to figure out. That took me 2500-3000 battles to actually properly figure out + a lot of learning in high level CBs. This positioning is BY FAR the hardest thing to learn in the game, and the fact it lacks in CVs make the learning curve a lot easier for them. There is learning involved in playing a CV, as there is everything in life, but this learning curve is just way faster due to the lack of it. Target selection, focus fire, map awareness, whatever the [edited]. That is included in all other classes too. The only thing different is that positioning is lacking from CVs, and that shooting is harder than dodging flak and dropping. And I have found exactly the same.

not really going to touch the cv players playstyle thing. It's more annoyance than imbalance and thus not relevant.

the fact the spreadsheets are 1.5years old is not exactly bad. The maplesyrup playerbase analysis is also a year old, but I doubt that the average of 48% winrate has changed as well. These things generally do not change, and the graphs from the Track™️ bot basically prove this

Thank you for reading, sincerely, [RAIN] Sister

and honestly as a little side note, I do want to add the same thing PQ said at the start of his video. If you dont have any sort of credibility and you want to reply to this, dont bother

 

link to the original reddit thread

Spoiler

 


Just a reminder, it should be obvious I am not the author of either the text preceding this paragraph, or any linked content. I just believe, Reddit should not have all the fun topics, and that this latest element in the "Ahskance Affair" is worthy of further dissemination and discussion here. Full disclosure, I have nothing to disclose/

Edited by HonniSoitQuiMalYPense
  • Cool 7
  • Funny 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Boring 5
  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
0 posts

st.gif.f916a46477e292caefa81fc7c1ca5c85.gif

And seriously, what's up with that title? Joe jimbo reacts to Suzy doe reacting to a dog barking reacts to the washer running...

Edited by OuijaApologist
  • Cool 4
  • Funny 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,432
[MIBRA]
Banned
1,424 posts
9,025 battles

I also really don't like these comparisons to chess or rock/paper/scissors. CV mains always bring that argument, thinking they are some counter to one of the other classes, but when CVs are present, they aren't the rock, or the paper or even the scissors. They are a totally different thing that counters all others class while remaining relatively safe for most part, without a natural counter to itself. Actually, that is dumb comparison even when talking about the 3 other classes, because the individual ship can counter another of the same type. Smaland is a counter to other DDs for example. Des Moines can wreck other cruisers, especially if they are caught poorly angled, not even full broadside. Smolensk is the terror of BBs (or CA and DDs for that matter, depending on the situation), while taking overpens in return for minimal damage.

 

Also, when talking about crossfires, PQ referenced the time taken to set up these crossfires, which Ahskance completely ignored, misrepresenting the original point. PQ talks about how it takes a long time to set up a crossfire you've thought about minutes earlier. Hell, in his last video, it takes him more than 10 minutes to set up his crossfire, while a CV takes a few seconds to do it anywhere it wants.

And for spotting, Ahskance also refuses to mention how aircrafts can spot players firing from behind cover, even if they are far. With aircrafts on the air, even firing the main guns can be death sentence for squishier cruisers that rely on positioning and concealment to deal damage. He thinks only flying for a few seconds over the cruisers and spot them is valid. 

  • Cool 7
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,578
[REVY]
Members
8,488 posts
6,118 battles
34 minutes ago, HonniSoitQuiMalYPense said:

Analysis of Ahskance Reacts: Potato Quality's CV Video, by [RAIN] Sister

34 minutes ago, HonniSoitQuiMalYPense said:

link to the original reddit thread

  Hide contents

 

Who is rain sister?  And why does the reddit link not lead anywhere?  Is this a troll post?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
831
[-Y-]
Members
843 posts
61 battles
3 minutes ago, Sventex said:

Who is rain sister?  And why does the reddit link not lead anywhere?  Is this a troll post?

A formatting error, I apologise

No comment on the trolling.

 

Who is (Rain)Sister? Who is Ahskance, who is Potatoe Quality, who are you? Who are any of us.

Edited by HonniSoitQuiMalYPense
  • Cool 1
  • Boring 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,252
[KWF]
Members
6,713 posts
7,321 battles

Personally all the points I would ever want to argue were covered by Pulicat's discussion with Ahskance; regardless if one likes CVs or not I found it pretty illuminating.

Besides, Ahskance doesn't represent the CV main community as a whole nor is he some form of appointed spokesperson. Now if he wants to be a figurehead is a different matter. The only comment I will make is that making too long a@@ 3+ hour videos harm any semblance of structured arguments and end up becoming repetitive or missing the point. If you read this Ahskance, might be better to focus on one aspect of your arguments at a time in much shorter videos.

As for the rock paper scissors thing, every time I see it  mentioned I cringe a little. Rock paper scissors died or mutated to something different in 2017 and people should finally go on.

 

Edited by warheart1992
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,432
[MIBRA]
Banned
1,424 posts
9,025 battles
12 minutes ago, Sventex said:

I'll just say that Ashkance is a very bad resource to listen to.  He has no standards.  He wants to be dominated in pvp because it's an "experience".  You should not go to him for balancing advice.

Someone quoted that exact part in the original topic in reddit.

  • Cool 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
780
[WOLF7]
Members
1,057 posts
1 hour ago, HonniSoitQuiMalYPense said:

meme32-2.jpg

 


Analysis of Ahskance Reacts: Potato Quality's CV Video, by [RAIN] Sister

Discussion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYb-6unvk9k&feature=emb_title The video in question, The Analysis by [RAIN] Sister

Honestly... I'm slowly watching through the vod now of the reaction to PQ'd vid, but one thing that already kind of stands out to me is a point you make addressing the crossfire that PQ mentions. You don't call it a crossfire but a threat, I disagree with it, but thats more semantics than anything. The point I want to make however is that you compare the damage 5 ships will do to the potential of one. Yes taking 60k is probably not worse than going broadside to 5 ships (when excluding the dot damage a CV inflicts during or after that) but the problem lies in the fact that the CV can do this, regardless of many things in the game. you could call this a "vulnerable position" of course, it probably is, because being nose in against 5 ships is, usually a vulnerable position. This however does not mean that taking 60k of what is practically unavoidable damage is okay just because its the lesser evil.

the fact you call this "not massive damage" is also pretty amusing considering the fact you later call FDR drops as having "really high damage, 20k is a lot of damage" which is the exact amount you use in that example, which is a bit contradicting.

next up the whole element of surprise thing

in general when playing clan battles or any competitive modes where there is a homecap to be cap and a contested cap. Ranked is not really competitive since you still play with mongs but thats not important. You argue there is still an element of surprise. When playing in hurricane league, it will take some time for the enemy to cap their home cap, touch it or cap it. When you do a 7 push to one side without a CV the enemy team will know that this is happening due to your homecap not being contested. However, teams will just send 1 ship to cap the homecap when they want to do these things just to make sure this is not obvious. The best teams will realize that the cap is extremely late and probably be slightly more prepared for this possibility, but cant count on this. Even with a 5/2 split the element of surprise is there and if there is a DD on the 2 side it is impossible for the other team to know until they a play being made. Thus there is a lot of element of surprise, up to a solid 3-4 minutes, When the enemy team has already deployed into positions and (tries to) make(s) their own plays. However if you introduce a CV, this is not possible. After 45 seconds all deployments are known. He wont linger there forever no, but you have a 45 second window again before your new plans are revealed, if your intention was to bait. In any competitive setting this absolutely ruins any element of surprise and we all know it. That DD thats been unspotted for so long? can be found by CV, even more so by using the plane detection system to guess the possible location. That cruiser that's been unspotted for a while? CV can go spot it. It costs time, but its sooooo much easier for a CV to spot than it is for a DD to spend severeal minutes and risk its body than for a CV to fly over, look for 20 seconds and find said ship.

in randoms this usually doesnt matter too much, since deployment is not nearly as big of an issue as long as flanks are similarly balanced in terms of ship numbers, rather than ships themselves

the -50% air detection change is scrapped afaik

the argumentation on torpedoes hitting the bow/aft which is 50% healable and the torpbelt factoring this in is slightly flawed. Simply by saturating the bow or the aft you can already get -50% damage from torps taken there and then on top heal 50% of that already reduced damage. So then no, its not completely fair to say "its factored in" because its citadel damage and citadel cannot be saturated ever.

and then the whole "if you can citadel the BB thats nose in to your teammates it can be the damage your team needs to overcome that battleship" is referring back to the crossfire point that PQ makes.

also 2/3 fires is not uncommon at all for CV drops. 2 is not uncommon, quite the opposite. Usually when dropping with midway its a disappointment to get 1 fire instead of 2, rather than "yay I got 2 instead of 1". The expected result, is 2 fires. 3 is uncommon yes, but 2 is already enough to warrant dcp in most cases

the damage necessary on a BB to pop heal is about 30-40k 2 drops is more than enough to warrant that, unless its mainly cit damage, which is 90% permanent damage. However when talking about a cruiser, 1 drop is, in most cases, enough to force heal, and since most ships in competitive settings are cruisers... well...

also the thing that "who is setting the fires is not relevant, a BB can do the same" is not entirely fair either. Spotting comes into play again, since that might be a reason why you're getting focused in the first place, and the other thing is, yeah the conqueror can do the same, but the conqueror is far less likely to do so, and can be counterplayed much more easily by repositioning. Reverse behind that island, dodge the torps, pop the hydro to do so. Those tools dont exactly exist in the same fashion as they do for a CV strike in such a situation

also people DO call out plane losses in competitive.

honestly the mouse over the ship and "send fighters" is not a bad idea tbh

the DFAA thing is a bit ehh. I agree with the fact that, for RTS it has to be extreme to counter an extreme, but the current DFAA is still too weak. Give gearing back 300%, grozo too probably. and cruisers/other DDs/BBs to something like 150-250%

I do think however that it should be, in some way, easier for a CV to disengage if a target does use it.

the whole rock paper scissors game doesnt make a whole lot sense. This is because one counters the other but beats the other. But is like introducing an atom bomb in rock paper scissors atom bomb, where the atom bomb wins against every other possibility except itself. Yes you play differently without DDs/BBs/Cruisers whatever, but the problem is that a CV does what a DD can almost exclusively do, which is spot, also do what a BB can do, which is setup long range threat, while also providing heavy (DoT) damage like a cruiser. That is the fundamental flaw in comparing this to rock paper scissors. Its not like one of the classes inherently counter CVs and force the CV to play differently. Only the state of the game does that, not the composition of BB/CA/DD

well it forces the CV to play "differently" when there are few BBs but lots of DDs, but not nearly in the same way it would for the BB for instance

also comparing spotting to chess is not exactly a pristine analogy. This is an arcade game and 12v12, not 1v1 where 1 player controls so many things. A comparison to league is better, which actually does employ something extremely similar you described. Fog of War. Which does actually hide players and makes the game more tactical. Wouldn't be exactly fun if there was a champion that could suddenly reveal the entire map. I guess you can argue twisted fate does something similar, but its very short lasting and not often available, making its use far more niche than just that.

Yes O7 adapted to the venezia meta, they adapted to the T6 meta, as did every other top team that played those seasons, but VERY few of them actually enjoyed it. I talk with quite a lot of people. Mostly from EU because that's the region I play on, and I can tell you that the ratio of players in top clans that enjoyed those seasons more than the older seasons is smaller than 1/10, because I know of just 2 players who actually enjoyed it, and they were the CV mains themselves. 1 player out of 7. per team, but only 2 out of 30 per clan usually.

The whole "you can still play around concealment in a DD" is not exactly true. In a torpedoboat you want to be as close as possible to make sure your torpedostrikes land. If there is no radar threat its not uncommon for DD players to sit at 6-7km from their target. This is simply IMPOSSIBLE in a CV game, just out of fear of being lit by a CV that either randomly flies over or comes to actively spot you. It's just not possible ever, just because the CV decides that its going to spot you, you will die in such a position, while in a non CV game, as long as you are wary of the enemy DD's position (through means like teammates, map awareness and RPF) you can maintain that position, until its at risk. At which point you can (usually) still run away from said DD that is forcing you out. In which case you are forcing the enemy DD to come over and contest you and waste severeal minutes of his time. Now the counterargument will be one of 2 things. You have to sit further back in your DD to avoid this scenario is one of them. Well frankly that's the entire issue. You simply cannot ever play like this in a CV match, which means your effect goes down because you have to torp from further, because of the mere possibility the CV might spot you. The other argument is that you can run away or use smoke. Running away is not really viable as the CV is way faster than you could ever hope to be. Smoking will save you temporarily, but then the CV leaves a fighter on top, forcing you to stay there for 60 seconds or die, which allows the hydro ships to move in and kill you in time, because you are so close. The explanation just does. not. work.

so simplified: you have to sit at a range with your DD where you can mitigate the threat presented enough. This range is significantly increased when there is a CV present, even if said CV is not focusing you

you might argue about radar, but radar ships dont sail at you at 200 knots, you outrun radar cruisers, and outspot them. Usually. This is why stealth radar is bad for the game.

Island positioning is significantly weaker and maybe I missed it, but you didnt talk about it. Idk the vod sometimes lags out and doesnt let me skip back at some points. Anyway I do hope you atleast acknowledge that island play, which a lot of cruisers heavily rely on, is almost out of the window.

the reason PQ says "sniping at the back of the map" he doesnt mean actually the back of the map. its a bit similar to the DD explanation I just did. You have to play 1-3km further back sometimes because you simply cannot rely on going dark to disengage, which means you need more distance between you and them to mitigate the damage they can deal to you.

just going to skip the wot artillery, not interested in wot, dont care, never played

next up the 45% vs 70%. There was a pretty clear example. A clanmate of mine was streaming ([RAIN]) and Lulu was in the division. lulu has a 70% winrate. He got focused by a carrier in a match for multiple minutes straight in a DD, despite turning, dodging, juking, you name it. smoking whatever. The CV player is barely 50% winrate and new to the game (~1k battles). In no way would that same player have been able to impact the match this much by removing and during that time dying Lulu to play the entire game, in a surface ship, because very simply, more counterplay exists for this. It's just not possible for that same player to influence my clanmate's match by killing an extremely high impact player in the match like this in any other ship than a CV.

the whole "styling all over people with DD juking takes a LOT of skill and only a very small % of the playerbase is able to do this to a degree where its extremely consistent and constant. This simply doesn't go for me in a carrier styling on the enemy kurfurst with bombs and torps, or styling on the enemy DM with bombs and rockets. It's just not the same interaction and I'm pretty sure that I can't style on Lulu in a surface ship most of the time, but I can "style" on him in a CV. That is simply the reality.

its not about "the player with said winrate is able to touch me and thats why I dont respect it" If that same player is in a cruiser hitting me, thats acceptable damage, because I have active counterplay, or he simply did a good prediction. I can't completely dodge the CV, I can mitigate it. I can't completely dodge the spotting. I can't completely predict where the CV will drop and slow down or accelerate in time (not yet anyway, since that is/was in testing) It's simply the fact that a less skilled played does not need to use his brain in the same capacity the surface ship does to hit me. It's about said player simply being able to damage regardless of skill. You can mitigate so much damage from bad players if you are only skilled enough in most circumstances. Simply not the case for CVs because there is no real "aiming" to be done.

CV players being better only better in PR is also not true. Most crapplayers that have better stats in CVs also have better Winrate, usually by a couple %

the "its fine because im good at it" argument comes from the fact that, for a large majority, people who defend CVs, are generally only good in CVs and not very competent in other classes. Wait that reminds me of someone.....

honestly the fact you say "which side of the map do I have to piss on first" is [edited]hilarious. Almost directly admitting that CVs just crapon people by default regardless

not sure you can say that for any other class in the game

The thing is, what PQ said about positioning is true. Learning to aim and learning to shoot is not hard, it took me 500-1000 battles to figure that out. Positioning however is WAY harder to figure out. That took me 2500-3000 battles to actually properly figure out + a lot of learning in high level CBs. This positioning is BY FAR the hardest thing to learn in the game, and the fact it lacks in CVs make the learning curve a lot easier for them. There is learning involved in playing a CV, as there is everything in life, but this learning curve is just way faster due to the lack of it. Target selection, focus fire, map awareness, whatever the [edited]. That is included in all other classes too. The only thing different is that positioning is lacking from CVs, and that shooting is harder than dodging flak and dropping. And I have found exactly the same.

not really going to touch the cv players playstyle thing. It's more annoyance than imbalance and thus not relevant.

the fact the spreadsheets are 1.5years old is not exactly bad. The maplesyrup playerbase analysis is also a year old, but I doubt that the average of 48% winrate has changed as well. These things generally do not change, and the graphs from the Track™️ bot basically prove this

Thank you for reading, sincerely, [RAIN] Sister

and honestly as a little side note, I do want to add the same thing PQ said at the start of his video. If you dont have any sort of credibility and you want to reply to this, dont bother

 

link to the original reddit thread

  Reveal hidden contents

 


Just a reminder, it should be obvious I am not the author of either the text preceding this paragraph, or any linked content. I just believe, Reddit should not have all the fun topics, and that this latest element in the "Ahskance Affair" is worthy of further dissemination and discussion here. Full disclosure, I have nothing to disclose/

Wall Of Text Blank Template - Imgflip

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
831
[-Y-]
Members
843 posts
61 battles
3 minutes ago, Vasili_One_Bonk_only said:

Shhhhhh. You're not allowed to point out what a certain CV player has said in regards to how we should cherish being bullied by CV's. 

Oh I absolutely love to be dominated, who doesn't? Top is over rated, bottom is so much more fun. You can get sunk without ANY player vs player interaction. (Don't quote me on that please.) Thanks should go to the person who sorted/formmated Sister's criticisms and published them on Reddit.

Edited by HonniSoitQuiMalYPense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,662
[SALVO]
Members
3,718 posts
7,569 battles
27 minutes ago, HonniSoitQuiMalYPense said:

Oh I absolutely love to be dominated, who doesn't? Top is over rated, bottom is so much more fun. 

I know your being sarcastic, still to work with the analogy:  Bottom / Sub is supposed to be fun because its the ultimate in letting go  and having  the illusion someone else is 100% in charge of the experience. This enables the sub to reach greater heights of pleasure / experience.  Where in reality the bottom/sub sets the boundaries beforehand and has a safe word to interrupt the whole thing, while the top/dom has to abide by the rules set by the bottom.  Otherwise they cross the boundary from consenting relationship to abusive or even illegal behavior.

     Where is the safe word to make the CV stop?

Edited by eviltane
  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1
  • Haha 2
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,432
[MIBRA]
Banned
1,424 posts
9,025 battles
21 minutes ago, General_WTSherman said:

I doubt he wants to be dominated—he wants to dominate.  Otherwise, he would play a different class only rarely play CV

Sarcasm is not your thing, is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
6,336 posts

So, another wall of text on the subject, with the note at the end that if you're not purple, this isn't for you.  

<Yawn>

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,432
[MIBRA]
Banned
1,424 posts
9,025 battles

Why do people get so mad when the obvious fact that they are not qualified to discuss game balancing is brought up?

  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,064
[WOLFG]
Members
13,410 posts
12,847 battles

After reading this, I can only say that some of you unicums have interesting lives away from the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,513
[HINON]
Members
14,340 posts

So this is a reaction to a reaction of a reaction looking to garner more reactions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,481
[D-H-O]
-Members-
4,756 posts
16,533 battles

Folks,

As with every topic, people are allowed to have their opinions. They are allowed to like or dislike a content creator as they see fit.

However, we are not allowed to shame, attack or take a conversation off topic because you don't like someone's content.

-Hapa

  • Cool 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,159
[A-I-M]
Members
4,103 posts
15,365 battles

MannyD_of_the_Sea reacts to another post  by HonniBoobooSoSueMeAlreadyPlease:

[selects “Ignore User” and moves on.]
Life is too short, and both your name AND your posts are too long for what extremely limited value you bring to the table.

  • Cool 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
566
[-REK-]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
767 posts

CV's are here, they can all be countered.   

Most people do not like having to change their intended playstyle when one shows up.

Most people in randoms still play a solo game, there is no real communication.  

No one likes a cop on the highway, but guess what? smart people slow down use waze or a radar detector,  those that don't get a ticket, sometimes when there are no cops you can speed to your hearts content.

Ashkances shows you how to counter and play CV's watch and learn.

 

  • Cool 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Boring 1
  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
831
[-Y-]
Members
843 posts
61 battles
31 minutes ago, MannyD_of_The_Sea said:

HonniBoobooSoSueMeAlreadyPlease

thankyou for my (next) February username. +1

31 minutes ago, MannyD_of_The_Sea said:

Life is too short, and both your name AND your posts are too long for what extremely limited value you bring to the table.

Life is short, I agree. And I also agree, I am of extremely limited value. But that is hardly fair to extend to the content creators and critics that I quote in the OP.

Edited by HonniSoitQuiMalYPense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,432
[MIBRA]
Banned
1,424 posts
9,025 battles

 

 

Quote

CV's are here, they can all be countered.

And this is why at the end we can read this

 

Quote

 If you dont have any sort of credibility and you want to reply to this, dont bother

It sucks when people without any credibility, that doesn't know how to play come here and say stuff like that.

  • Thanks 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
831
[-Y-]
Members
843 posts
61 battles
51 minutes ago, RipNuN2 said:

So this is a reaction to a reaction of a reaction looking to garner more reactions?

this is a decent and fair summary, yes. And you have added your reaction to the reaction of a reaction that reacted to an effort to garner reactions. It is called cross platform (reddit/forums/youtube) debate.

6 minutes ago, WarStore said:

It sucks when people without any credibility, that doesn't know how to play come here and say stuff like that.

I kind of agree that elitist statements don't encourage sympathetic responses, whether or not the underlying statements are true.

Edited by HonniSoitQuiMalYPense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×