Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
treadhead52

So what happened to the subs?

9 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
34 posts
4,233 battles

A few months ago I seem to remember WG saying that subs would be in game before the end of the year. What happened?

Maybe they meant the end of this year. lol

And yeah, yeah, yeah, I know there's a lot of sub haters out there that hope they're never implemented, but I for one enjoyed them. Gave the game a fresh feel with something new to do.

Edited by treadhead52
  • Cool 1
  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
107
[NWO-1]
Members
241 posts
5,151 battles

WG keeps very tight control on information. We will know when we know. But I really liked subs and got my year of premium time in anticipation of them coming sometime. 150k damage at T6, yes!

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,480
[O_O]
Members
7,038 posts
17,384 battles

As currently developed, I have serious concerns about subs and how they will affect this game.  I am hoping the delay of implementation is due to WG trying to make sure they are not game breaking before they are brought in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48
[TMP]
Members
393 posts

Battlestations Pacific handled subs pretty well. I would say yes to subs but have a unit limit per mission, meaning only allowing one, maybe two. 
 

it will be cool to see an I-400 class, carriers watchout!

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
551
[KMS]
[KMS]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
3,813 posts
12,810 battles
1 hour ago, Dreddnort said:

Battlestations Pacific handled subs pretty well. I would say yes to subs but have a unit limit per mission, meaning only allowing one, maybe two. 
 

it will be cool to see an I-400 class, carriers watchout!

Ouch WoWs being compared to Battlestations...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
261
[TFFOX]
Members
1,111 posts
3,574 battles
1 hour ago, desmo_2 said:

As currently developed, I have serious concerns about subs and how they will affect this game.  I am hoping the delay of implementation is due to WG trying to make sure they are not game breaking before they are brought in.

oooh I got an Idea to make them not OP: Give them a limited number of torps! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48
[TMP]
Members
393 posts
23 hours ago, Nachoo31 said:

Ouch WoWs being compared to Battlestations...

Although the game is old, from another time (from a 3-d model/graphics standpoint) the in-game play was relatively strong, and in many ways more complex and versatile, the carrier/plane gameplay is superior to WoW, the bots were more intelligent, the historical scenarios (geographical, ship makeup and missions) were better. The only huge leap WOW has is graphics detail, number of available ships, and ship to ship warfare mechanics. The WoW missions, attacking a port, defending a port, escort delivery/retrieval, etc. are very rudimentary and one dimensional, no sub or land based air attack. AI bot mechanics is simple and predictable. BP’s major flaw was it’s focus on fleet management rather than individual ship control (though obviously it had that aspect).

Edited by Dreddnort
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×