Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Droz1937

MM working as intended.

13 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

81
[-ARP-]
Beta Testers
173 posts

shot-20_12.15_02_53.36-0686.thumb.jpg.198a1d7c679467e786ede4f17f818eb7.jpg

 

As you can see, the Tier 6 Battleship was paired against a Tier 6 Cruiser and a Tier 7 Destroyer was paired against a Tier 6 Destroyer. The same team got the benefit in both cases. I have seen AI added in random battles...would that not have been the best solution here? Obviously, the match maker could not pair properly...

  • Sad 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
227
[GLF]
Members
1,076 posts
17,642 battles

That looks like its time to go fix a snack, and a drink, and take a potty break... maybe let the dog out too. 

  • Thanks 2
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,475
[REVY]
Members
8,169 posts
6,118 battles
2 hours ago, Droz1937 said:

shot-20_12.15_02_53.36-0686.thumb.jpg.198a1d7c679467e786ede4f17f818eb7.jpg

 

As you can see, the Tier 6 Battleship was paired against a Tier 6 Cruiser and a Tier 7 Destroyer was paired against a Tier 6 Destroyer. The same team got the benefit in both cases. I have seen AI added in random battles...would that not have been the best solution here? Obviously, the match maker could not pair properly...

In before the CV mafia tell you that 2 CVs against 4 surface ships is totally fair and balanced.

  • Cool 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
234
[CHA0S]
Members
171 posts
2,431 battles
30 minutes ago, Sventex said:

In before the CV mafia tell you that 2 CVs against 4 surface ships is totally fair and balanced

Would they though?  Even CV proponents usually admit two CVs generally is not ideal, never mind the size of the teams involved in the match in question...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,475
[REVY]
Members
8,169 posts
6,118 battles
8 minutes ago, crazyeightyfive said:

Would they though?  Even CV proponents usually admit two CVs generally is not ideal, never mind the size of the teams involved in the match in question...

But how can that be the case if CVs are a balanced ship type?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
234
[CHA0S]
Members
171 posts
2,431 battles
4 hours ago, Sventex said:

But how can that be the case if CVs are a balanced ship type?

Does your 'argument' extend beyond "There's a limit on the number of the class that can be present in a match?"

If not, that's a weak argument, especially seeing as all classes have a similar limit...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,475
[REVY]
Members
8,169 posts
6,118 battles
4 minutes ago, crazyeightyfive said:

Does your 'argument' extend beyond "There's a limit on the number of the class that can be present in a match?"

If not, that's a weak argument, especially seeing as all classes have a similar limit...

Apart from submarines, no other ship type is anywhere close to limited to just 2 per team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,111
[WOLFG]
Members
31,420 posts
9,664 battles
4 hours ago, Sventex said:

But how can that be the case if CVs are a balanced ship type?

Who says they are? They are unbalanced, and unfair. But as long as both teams have one, and only one, I'm ok with it.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
234
[CHA0S]
Members
171 posts
2,431 battles
1 minute ago, Sventex said:

Apart from submarines, no other ship type is anywhere close to limited to just 2 per team.

Subs aren't here yet.  Is the argument that the limit of two is somehow special?

Not exactly compelling...

Seriously though, the constant whining about CVs is far more unpleasant and toxic than facing two in every battle.  You folks with your unending hate boners are the single most negative aspect about this entire game.

Can CVs be frustrating?  Absolutely.  So is being deleted by a BB salvo 3 minutes in.  So is being spammed with HE shells from a cruiser ducked behind an island.  So is dodging wave after wave of torps from invisible DDs, while CAs and BBs rain fire down on you while it keeps you spotted from stealth.

Every complaint you people make has answers/responses/counter arguments - you just don't like them.  Your complaints are hollow as they can apply to other classes at times too - yet I don't see the same kind of soul-wracking sobbing going on with them.

Rationality has left the chat with this topic.  CV hate is an ugly bandwagon.  You should hop off and enjoy the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,475
[REVY]
Members
8,169 posts
6,118 battles
2 minutes ago, Skpstr said:

Who says they are? They are unbalanced, and unfair. But as long as both teams have one, and only one, I'm ok with it.

The pro-CV crowd didn't come here, so just assume I'm wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,475
[REVY]
Members
8,169 posts
6,118 battles
1 minute ago, crazyeightyfive said:

Subs aren't here yet.  Is the argument that the limit of two is somehow special?

Yes, because 2 is a lower number than 5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
81
[-ARP-]
Beta Testers
173 posts

Interesting how this turned into a CV problem, when that was not the presented issue...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×