4,259 [CNO] Soshi_Sone [CNO] Members 6,283 posts 19,164 battles Report post #1 Posted November 19, 2020 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,492 [REVY] Sventex Members 8,236 posts 6,118 battles Report post #2 Posted November 19, 2020 3 minutes ago, Soshi_Sone said: Her actual destruction was not so cataclysmic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,772 [WOLF5] AJTP89 Supertester 4,731 posts 4,263 battles Report post #3 Posted November 19, 2020 Just historically accurate 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
832 [KIA-T] Akeno017 Members 2,237 posts 9,842 battles Report post #4 Posted November 19, 2020 41 minutes ago, Sventex said: Her actual destruction was not so cataclysmic. When a ship sinks from flooding in this game, it goes up in flames with a massive explosion. Unfortuantely WG has yet to realise how this does not make sense. Let alone adjust things like detonation deaths. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
367 black_hull4 Members 1,109 posts 1,567 battles Report post #5 Posted November 19, 2020 SCP-4217: All skill, no luck Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
984 [PT] LunchCutter Members 1,018 posts 3,036 battles Report post #6 Posted November 19, 2020 That's what happens when a aging 20+ year old Battlecruiser is sent against a modern, powerful and heavily armored battleship.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
