0 destroyer67 Members 3 posts 894 battles Report post #1 Posted April 6, 2015 So, I frequently read up about the ridiculous armament of battleships, and how incredibly large and powerful their guns are. I began reading about the ammunition types, I saw the usual, High Explosive, Armor Piercing, and then I saw it, Semi-Armor Piercing shells. I tried to read about them and didn't get a straight answer. I assume they would be paired up with a high explosive charge to crack hulls. What is the purpose of a Semi-Armor Piercing shell? And were they even put into large use? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
86 Enaris Beta Testers 231 posts 306 battles Report post #2 Posted April 6, 2015 An SAP shell is an armor piercing (reinforced nose) round with a high explosive core. Pretty much all naval rounds that were designed to penetrate heavy armor is going to be SAP. It penetrates and goes BOOM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
242 [MTLRN] _Dreadnaught_ Alpha Tester 600 posts 4,961 battles Report post #3 Posted April 6, 2015 An SAP shell is an armor piercing (reinforced nose) round with a high explosive core. Pretty much all naval rounds that were designed to penetrate heavy armor is going to be SAP. It penetrates and goes BOOM. So it's just like ingame AP? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
86 Enaris Beta Testers 231 posts 306 battles Report post #4 Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) So it's just like ingame AP? As I just got my invite 5 minutes ago... I can't do any more than guess that it's the case. For instance, I know that the bombs carried by Dive Bombers to attack carriers are often called "AP" but are technically considered SAP, so that'd be my guess here. Edited April 6, 2015 by Enaris Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5,661 Macabe Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers 12,413 posts Report post #5 Posted April 6, 2015 So it's just like ingame AP? Pretty much. SAP in-game would likely be used for those ships that you always overpen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
544 [LFD] BnaditCorps Alpha Tester 3,951 posts 723 battles Report post #6 Posted April 7, 2015 So it's just like ingame AP? yup Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
233 Drakenred Alpha Tester 3,327 posts Report post #7 Posted April 7, 2015 http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/Gun_Data_p2.htm usualy SAP was a smaller round most conventional AP shot had a "Burster charge" in the base, Incidentaly for the big guns in the US Navy, from best pen to worst pen (and smallest to largest HE capacity it was) AP (some sources refer to them as APC or CAP or AP-Caped) bascialy the cap was a flat plate designed to improve the penitration of the round. Comon (usualy did not have a cap) High Capacity or Sometimes HC instead of HE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
26 Thoddy Alpha Tester 279 posts Report post #8 Posted April 12, 2015 (edited) Comparison of german 38 cm projectiles weight all 800 kg identical ballistics projectile-------------------explosive charge------%cap weight L 4,4 APC ---------------------2.35%-----------------14% L 4,4 HE base fuze(SAP)----4.1%-----------------8.7% L 4,6 HE nose fuze------------8.0% penetration capability of the L 4,4 HE base fuze approximately 70%-75% of the APC at the same impact condition Edited April 12, 2015 by Thoddy 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
9 Marine_Diesel Members 252 posts 1,781 battles Report post #9 Posted July 9, 2015 Was looking up the Scharnhorst and the 28 cm SK C/34 main gun and discovered this. Perhaps not all ships will have SAP shells?? Any news on this yet?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,728 [ABDA] crzyhawk Beta Testers 17,538 posts 12,810 battles Report post #10 Posted July 9, 2015 Semi-AP generally is a delayed response fuze. So it hits and triggers, but had a delay before it explodes. That allows it to penetrate a bit (usually only thin armor, hence semi) before detonating inside. It will have a bigger charge than a true AP projectile, hence more damage. of course, if it fails to penetrate, it's just an HE round. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Morat242 Members 4 posts 418 battles Report post #11 Posted July 9, 2015 AP (some sources refer to them as APC or CAP or AP-Caped) The reason that USN shells are called both AP or APC is that the USN during this period didn't call anything an AP shell unless it had an AP cap on it, which would make it technically APC. Really they're APCBC, because they all had ballistic caps on top of the AP caps. So the USN official designation "AP shell" = APC/APCBC. Basically the philosophy was, "if it's not optimized for armor penetration, it's not an AP shell". Because US AP shells also had unusually low HE content (~1.5%) for greater penetration (because a smaller cavity for HE makes the shell harder for armor to break), after WW1 even an AP shell over 2% HE was considered "Special Common", not a true AP shell. In practice, the US only made one Special Common shell with a real AP cap, for the 8" Mark 15, because if you need a real AP cap, use a real AP shell. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
819 Aetreus Alpha Tester 4,302 posts 7,932 battles Report post #12 Posted July 10, 2015 SAP generally represented an idea of a shell's parameters, not a technical design or specification. All major-caliber AP used a HE filler and base fuse, SAP just (generally)represents shells that had relatively less penetration than an AP round of the same generation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites