Wake up, want to play some WOWS and i get this

[Legio_X_]

 

This was my 3rd loss in a row with these types of teams. What better way to tell a player to do something else for the rest of the day and not play your game. 

 

 

[michael_zahnle]

What is this saying?  The other team was that good or your team was that bad?

[Usedcarjock]

Just now, michael_zahnle said:

What is this saying?  The other team was that good or your team was that bad?

Yes.

[Legio_X_]

9 minutes ago, michael_zahnle said:

What is this saying?  The other team was that good or your team was that bad?

Considering I was only one to break 1000 points. Yes they were horrible. Like the Minotaur sailing broadside infront of a Stalingrad awful.

[Navalpride33]

So when a team works together you and win you dont complain... HOWEVER,

When a red team works together for a hard win.. Then you complain to a higher power because the game is being unfair...

From what I see, I see a lot of single ship sunk scores... That tells me to many 1vs 1 fights were lost in the trenches. It happens... Sometimes, you win those 1 vs 1 battles and sometimes it will cost you a win.

It just comes to show as evidence to my hypothesis... IF the high tier fatsos dont produce, you're not winning  match. No other ship class will carry the match for the win..

If ya going to play at high tiers, you live by high caliber gun and you will die by a high caliber guns...Low Caliber guns will not save/win it for you.. 

It happens.

IMO nerf the high tier BBs, if people dont know how to produce in them.. Then its going to be a very long game for a loss.(close to automatic)

Then again, I only see buffs for the BB class... Especially at high tier, that means these types of games will only become mainstream/common.

GL

[Legio_X_]

6 minutes ago, Navalpride33 said:

So when a team works together you and win you dont complain... HOWEVER,

When a red team works together for a hard win.. Then you complain to a higher power because the game is being unfair...

From what I see, I see a lot of single ship sunk scores... That tells me to many 1vs 1 fights were lost in the trenches. It happens... Sometimes, you win those 1 vs 1 battles and sometimes it will cost you a win.

It just comes to show as evidence to my hypothesis... IF the high tier fatsos dont produce, you're not winning  match. No other ship class will carry the match for the win..

If ya going to play at high tiers, you live by high caliber gun and you will die by a high caliber guns...Low Caliber guns will not save/win it for you.. 

It happens.

IMO nerf the high tier BBs, if people dont know how to produce in them.. Then its going to be a very long game for a loss.(close to automatic)

Then again, I only see buffs for the BB class... Especially at high tier, that means these types of games will only become mainstream/common.

GL

You call that a “hard win” LOL. It was a roflstomp from the start. I guess you don’t know the difference between an actual win that was down to the wire against two good teams and this crap.

[Navalpride33]

7 minutes ago, Legio_X_ said:

You call that a “hard win” LOL. It was a roflstomp from the start. I guess you don’t know the difference between an actual win that was down to the wire against two good teams and this crap.

Its high tier, its not "easy." Not to mention, 1vs1 situation at high tiers are not easy to win... That is what I meant about a hard win... The "down to the wire" matches are not "hard."

As long as everyone do what they're suppose to, its a natural progression rather then... Losing the 1vs1 battles (as shown by your pic).

Dont blame the teams, the root of the problem is power creep. Its only going to get worse not better.

Mind you, its only going to get a lot worse.

 

[RipNuN2]

[Maddau]

1 hour ago, Legio_X_ said:

 

This was my 3rd loss in a row with these types of teams. What better way to tell a player to do something else for the rest of the day and not play your game. 

 

 

I feel less exasperated by these kinds of losses than the ones where more than half my team survives and we lose by points at about the 12 min mark because no one can figure out we need to cap or take the center ring, or keep the lone DD out of our base, etc.

[kgh52]

Quote

This was my 3rd loss in a row with these types of teams. What better way to tell a player to do something else for the rest of the day and not play your game. 

Actually you're telling WG if you're not placed on winning teams you will not play.

[iRA6E]

2 hours ago, Legio_X_ said:

 

This was my 3rd loss in a row with these types of teams. What better way to tell a player to do something else for the rest of the day and not play your game. 

 

 

3 losses in a row...  one common player in all 3 losing games?     Try Co-op?   

[Legio_X_]

12 minutes ago, iRA6E said:

3 losses in a row...  one common player in all 3 losing games?     Try Co-op?   

Oh please. Let’s see you carry that team I was on big boy. I bet my yearly salary you couldn’t. 
 

P.s. don’t talk crap about someone when your stats are way worse.

[Lert]

2 hours ago, Navalpride33 said:

IMO nerf the high tier BBs, if people dont know how to produce in them.

So the solution to people being unable to produce is ... making it harder to produce? How's that work?

[Hel_Diver142]

25 minutes ago, Legio_X_ said:

Oh please. Let’s see you carry that team I was on big boy. I bet my yearly salary you couldn’t. 
 

P.s. don’t talk crap about someone when your stats are way worse.

Stats are over rated.

[mixmkz]

How do you average 16k damage in a conqueror, you can get that by firing just 2 salvos every game

[eviltane]

2 hours ago, Legio_X_ said:

You call that a “hard win” LOL. It was a roflstomp from the start. I guess you don’t know the difference between an actual win that was down to the wire against two good teams and this crap.

From the looks of it the other team just outclassed and outplayed your team across the board.  They almost all did good work with over half their team scoring above 1500 and everyone else scoring over or at  1100 the only exception being their Shima. 

[Meta_Man]

3 hours ago, Legio_X_ said:

 

This was my 3rd loss in a row with these types of teams. What better way to tell a player to do something else for the rest of the day and not play your game. 

 

 

We all have streaks, but in your photo I see you had just over 1000 xp in a tier 10 loss...not saying its bad....but its not a carry......your team was bad but it happens.happy hunting captain 

[xHeavy]

37 minutes ago, Legio_X_ said:

Oh please. Let’s see you carry that team I was on big boy. I bet my yearly salary you couldn’t. 
 

P.s. don’t talk crap about someone when your stats are way worse.

Stats are not that important. A collection of accumulated numbers.

Forget the money. Income does not a man make.

[AVR_Project]

Problem is that these types of game results affect a person mentally.

We tell ourselves, "It's just a Game", but the stress of failure has that domino effect on us that continues for a long time.

We start to see the spilled coffee and ignorant drivers on the road as a continuation of this unlucky streak.

Maybe Co-Op is a better game in the morning.  Gives you something to enjoy floating around blasting dumb bots.  Start your day of with some wins.

Just make sure you remove all the flags..  lol

[iRA6E]

37 minutes ago, Legio_X_ said:

Oh please. Let’s see you carry that team I was on big boy. I bet my yearly salary you couldn’t. 
 

P.s. don’t talk crap about someone when your stats are way worse.

LOL...  personal accountability apparently doesn't show up in the stats column rockstar....    I'm not the one coming to the forums to gripe about my inability to find a team to carry my [edited]...  the moment you did that you opened yourself up to it.   Because you know the only player you can count on to win the next random match your in?   Same one that was in all 3 of those losses...   I can go all day here....     

[Legio_X_]

5 minutes ago, iRA6E said:

LOL...  personal accountability apparently doesn't show up in the stats column rockstar....    I'm not the one coming to the forums to gripe about my inability to find a team to carry my [edited]...  the moment you did that you opened yourself up to it.   Because you know the only player you can count on to win the next random match your in?   Same one that was in all 3 of those losses...   I can go all day here....     

Get off your high horse. You talk like you can carry horrible teams with ease. 

[iRA6E]

1 minute ago, Legio_X_ said:

Get off your high horse. You talk like you can carry horrible teams with ease. 

Your comprehension of what I am saying is clearly on par with your definition of a RANDOM match?    incorrect..... 

PS -   I hate horses

[AVR_Project]

And then there are those Co-Op games where I'd rather be in a Random.....

 

[imaginary_b]

3 hours ago, Legio_X_ said:

This was my 3rd loss in a row with these types of teams. What better way to tell a player to do something else for the rest of the day and not play your game. 

What result do you want from your post?

- Do you want sympathy and hugs from other players because you lost 3 games in a row? (In this forum??)
- Do you want WarGaming to somehow ensure you never lose more than 3 games in a row? (What about winning 3 in a row?)
- Do you want advice from other players about how to play this game better?
- Do you want advice from other people about how to emotionally handle such a devastating experience?
- Do you want affirmation that you should not start your day by playing this game?

[TL_Warlord_Roff]

Happens to me all the time... and the worst games are the ones where I get killed at the 5 min mark or so because I zigged when I should of zagged, or pushed when I shouldn't have..... and I am still at top of the scoreboard.

Take comfort at least that at your worst, your still way better than a lot of players!