Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Hapa_Fodder

Dry Dock: Stalingrad

7 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

6,995
[WG]
Administrator, Developers, Community Department, WG Staff, In AlfaTesters
4,035 posts
14,440 battles

Take a look at the Soviet Special cruiser from an unusual angle!


Read it on the portal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,425 posts
40,904 battles
1 hour ago, MaxVladimus said:

Powerful long-range guns, perfect armor, perfect torpedo protection, high cruising speed...

perfection.jpg.054ca82ea44f3fe3979e8a0c5770fbfe.jpg

High cruising speed 🤣.

If you can see it in the wild do that at all, then that can be confirmed.🤔🤣

I am surprised it doesn't spontaneously detonate for overheating the engine while parked. 😏

It hates fire 🔥. If the whole team fired HE at it for a few minutes, it will burn down though.

Or get a CV to drop it. Yes, CVs were the counter. But someone cried. So manly.

Before WG nerfed the Hakuryu AP bombs, you could wipe out a good size of HP off it. A half health slightly toasted Stalingrad can die from just one drop. Stalin's tears would be served to everyone to drink as it slips under the water to cheers.  The CV player hailed a hero, a princess awards a 🏅 at the ceremony, and standing ovation with flowers ,  underwear flying about. 😏🤣

Oh, those were the days. It's a parked Stalingrad WG. It's supposed to be punished for parking. Would you prefer CV players hit it moving? It refuses to move its fat butt from behind safe island shaped like a whales V****! Russian bias, dah .😭😭😭😭

Edited by SteelRain_Rifleman
  • Cool 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,354
[ALL41]
Beta Testers
2,286 posts
9,867 battles

Typical soviet bias company. Cruiser that was CANCELLED in 1953 ... and whose specs were literal fantasy even when in the drawing board... is in the game. LOL. 'We recreate warships accurately' yet later in the video it says Stalingrad could destroy any other ship but not battleships... and yet in game, Stalingrad is far more effective vs BBs than cruiser.

 

@SteelRain_Rifleman : Why else do you think the haku bombs were nerfed? It certainly was not because it was hurting OTHER ships...but the moment stalingrad comes in? Poof. Nerfed. Quickly too.

Stalingrad is not a cruiser, Its not even a a supercruiser. Its a battleship with the speed of a cruiser and GPS-accurate guns compared to other cruisers, guns with higher than cruiser damage range but with almost BB pen capability yet retaining cruiser fuses. You can smell the bias from orbit.

 

Its freaking hilarious how bad this bias is. Soviet fantasy ships from the 1950s being pitted against 1920's designed and 1930's BUILT ships of other nations.

 

WG should make a 'Tier 11' ship category and shove all post WW2 built/designed ships there. See how well stalingrad fares against other nation's 'fantasy' ships or actually built 1950's ships. Know why Stalingrad was cancelled in the 1950's? It was an obsolete piece of crap by then. Just like the rest of the soviet navy before it and ever after.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,930
[PVE]
Members
6,946 posts
22,709 battles
4 hours ago, Skyfaller said:

 

@SteelRain_Rifleman

 

WG should make a 'Tier 11' ship category and shove all post WW2 built/designed ships there.

(Tag to Steel not relevant... can't "erase" it on my phone)

Why would they need to make a T11...most all ships in T9 & T10 are already post WW2 built/designed ships.

Edited by IfYouSeeKhaos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×