Jump to content
Forum Shutdown - July 28, 2023 Read more... ×
Forum Shutdown - July 28, 2023 Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
ole_seabee

Does wow listen?

59 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

698
[TF16B]
Members
387 posts
21,468 battles

I know this topic will be banned soon ... you have to be very positive in your posts or the monitors will delete you.

So many are unhappy with the direction wow is going we get squelched im not saying we are correct but should be alllowed to be heard. i have played pretty  much from the beginning and have spent money but not lots as i am a retired vet.

I feel they have their program and realy dont care what they think... I hope they do.

 

I hope this post will survive a  day or so if not will solidify my opinion .

 

 

 

 

 

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1
  • Haha 3
  • Boring 3
  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,379
[WOLFC]
Members
6,958 posts
20,305 battles

Since you haven’t violated any of the forum rules, I don’t see why this post would be deleted.

WG has shown on numerous occasions that they do listen and take into account well-reasoned, constructive feedback. The changes to AA mechanics and aerial spotting that are currently being tested are evidence of this.

Too many people equate “not listening” to “not agreeing.”

Edited by Nevermore135
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,197
[SLI]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
10,698 posts

They listen, they just don't do everything everyone says they should.  They can't.

I don't see why this thread would be deleted.  The only ones that are are the the ones that break the forum rules.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,114
[FOXEH]
Banned
14,364 posts
23,369 battles
12 minutes ago, Ruthless4u said:

Well they did rework the CV’s, players were demanding a CV rework for years right?

No. No one wanted the CV rework, they wanted the old RTS system fixed, and that was what they had asked for, for over 3 years. The rework is what WG gave them, unasked.

  • Cool 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,059
[KRAK]
Members
4,345 posts
30,254 battles

 

46 minutes ago, ole_seabee said:

I know this topic will be banned soon ... you have to be very positive in your posts or the monitors will delete you.

So in other words the beatings will continue until morale improves?

 

 

 

Edited by Vaffu
  • Funny 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,039
Members
34,409 posts
10,768 battles
12 minutes ago, Umikami said:

No. No one wanted the CV rework, they wanted the old RTS system fixed, and that was what they had asked for, for over 3 years. The rework is what WG gave them, unasked.

People didn't really specify, they just asked for specific issues to be addressed. Nobody expected a rework, they just assumed any fixes would be within the RTS framework.

Before you ask something of WG, think of how an evil genie might fulfill your wish. If you're ok with that, ask away lol.

Edited by Skpstr
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,764
[CMFRT]
Banned
16,985 posts
13 minutes ago, Umikami said:

No. No one wanted the CV rework, they wanted the old RTS system fixed, and that was what they had asked for, for over 3 years. The rework is what WG gave them, unasked.

See also, people asking for fixes for specific captain skills, and WG instead slapping us with a total skill rebork full of things no one wanted, skills being denied on the basis if ship type, and a bunch of new skills with poison pill "balance" downside... and then claiming "players have been asking for a skill rework". 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,483 posts
9,815 battles
15 minutes ago, Umikami said:

No. No one wanted the CV rework, they wanted the old RTS system fixed, and that was what they had asked for, for over 3 years. The rework is what WG gave them, unasked.

No what we got is more people have an easier access to the CV class compared to the even more broken RTS style.

  • Cool 2
  • Meh 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
390
[-GOD-]
Members
1,387 posts
3 minutes ago, khorender_1 said:

No what we got is more people have an easier access to the CV class compared to the even more broken RTS style.

Sorry the RTS wasn't this broke.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7
[-TFC-]
Members
27 posts
22,876 battles
5 minutes ago, khorender_1 said:

No what we got is more people have an easier access to the CV class compared to the even more broken RTS style.

Thats simple crap. People learned how to abuse that system/mechanics and now they have to fly and attack with visual drops rather then the computer doing it for them. Its not the game that the main issue but more of the mentality of the player themselves. Decent players will adjust and others will simply whine over the fact they cant have their way.

 

  • Cool 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,521
[HINON]
Members
14,340 posts
17 minutes ago, bosco1111 said:

Sorry the RTS wasn't this broke.

Take off the rose tinted glasses. I could keep the entire enemy team constantly spotted with the old system while launching attacks that would nuke ships in one run with undogeable cross drops. If the other CV wasnt proficient with strafing,  I could completely shut them down and in some cases nuke them in the opening minutes removing air spotting and support for their team. Also if you wanted to torp my teammates, I would keep my planes in position to spot all your torps right after launch. Etc etc etc.

Edited by RipNuN2
  • Cool 5
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,828
[WOLFG]
Members
18,207 posts
23,178 battles
41 minutes ago, bosco1111 said:

Sorry the RTS wasn't this broke.

 

The "problems" with RTS were strafing and manual drops.

And controlling more squadrons the higher in tier you got. 

Combined, that reduced the number of CV players.  From what WG wanted.

All of the "problems" with RTS were addressed in the rework (with the exception of manual drops, which was addressed by lower alpha, kinda).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
687 posts
362 battles
1 hour ago, Umikami said:

No. No one wanted the CV rework, they wanted the old RTS system fixed, and that was what they had asked for, for over 3 years. The rework is what WG gave them, unasked.

It was a bad attempt at humor on my part and I seen plenty of players asking for CV’s to be reworked, RTS fixed or removed completely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
390
[-GOD-]
Members
1,387 posts
52 minutes ago, RipNuN2 said:

Take off the rose tinted glasses. I could keep the entire enemy team constantly spotted with the old system while launching attacks that would nuke ships in one run with undogeable cross drops. If the other CV wasnt proficient with strafing,  I could completely shut them down and in some cases nuke them in the opening minutes removing air spotting and support for their team. Also if you wanted to torp my teammates, I would keep my planes in position to spot all your torps right after launch. Etc etc etc.

I'm not the one wearing pastel shades my friend nor was/am I a CV main but i never seemed to have to much trouble with them when they were RTS .It's just because most CV players couldn't counter other CV players that we have the jockitch version of cvs we have now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,114
[FOXEH]
Banned
14,364 posts
23,369 battles
1 hour ago, Skpstr said:

Before you ask something of WG, think of how an evil genie might fulfill your wish. If you're ok with that, ask away lol.

Ain't it the sad, sad truth!

1 hour ago, KilljoyCutter said:

See also, people asking for fixes for specific captain skills, and WG instead slapping us with a total skill rebork full of things no one wanted, skills being denied on the basis if ship type, and a bunch of new skills with poison pill "balance" downside... and then claiming "players have been asking for a skill rework". 

What the skills rework really does is insure anyone who wants to continue playing now has to grin out two more levels for everyone of their 19 point Captains. Thanks WG!

1 hour ago, khorender_1 said:

No what we got is more people have an easier access to the CV class compared to the even more broken RTS style.

It's hilarious that you think so, but your statement is blatantly false where it says the RTS system was broken. Granted, it took skills to master, but it was not broken, and could have been fixed had WG listened to player feedback. What the rework did was seriously dumb the skill level required down to where even battleship players could play CVs. The rework didn't make CV play better, it just made it easier so every dumptruck and his Uncle Fudd would buy one, at the expense of every other ship type.

  • Cool 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Meh 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,521
[HINON]
Members
14,340 posts
11 minutes ago, Compassghost said:

This is footage from the China WOWS server, where RTS CVs still exist.

90fnp82pai251.gif

 

 

 

Hmm looks underpowered, should only take 2 squads to kill it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,483 posts
9,815 battles
3 hours ago, bosco1111 said:

Sorry the RTS wasn't this broke.

 

True it was worse

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,483 posts
9,815 battles
2 hours ago, Umikami said:

Ain't it the sad, sad truth!

What the skills rework really does is insure anyone who wants to continue playing now has to grin out two more levels for everyone of their 19 point Captains. Thanks WG!

It's hilarious that you think so, but your statement is blatantly false where it says the RTS system was broken. Granted, it took skills to master, but it was not broken, and could have been fixed had WG listened to player feedback. What the rework did was seriously dumb the skill level required down to where even battleship players could play CVs. The rework didn't make CV play better, it just made it easier so every dumptruck and his Uncle Fudd would buy one, at the expense of every other ship type.

You have shown nothing but opinion, just like I blatantly did, the old way you could get cross dropped and killed off faster than you can now, your opinion say's it broken now, mine say's it was with the old system and I never complained about either system unlike you are now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,237
[-VT-]
Members
2,471 posts
28,865 battles

Most game developers do not, and in fact most come to despise their audience. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10,366
[WORX]
Members
17,696 posts
23,425 battles

IMO, WG listens to much...

They have come up with solutions to the communities complaining time and time again. Just keep this to heart every time they sugguest improvements or changes...

"Be careful what changes or suggestions you ask to "improve" or "optimize" a game function... You may not like the final polished product."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,862
[HINON]
Members
9,987 posts
21,168 battles
5 hours ago, Burnsy said:

I don't see why this thread would be deleted.  The only ones that are are the the ones that break the forum rules.

Mods with power abuse, i know they exist on these forums, out of all the 14 million futures Dr.Strange saw, there wasnt one where there isnt at least ONE Mod or Admin on this forum that doesnt abuse their power 

Edited by tcbaker777

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×