Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Learux

Let's put CV's and subs in their own separate game.

37 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,286
[RKLES]
Members
964 posts

 That way the over and underwater world can go damage  each other and the rest of the players play surface ships.

 

 

  • Cool 15
  • Thanks 4
  • Boring 7
  • Meh 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
244
[_BDA_]
Members
562 posts
8,929 battles

I wouldn't mind a sub hunting scenario between a light/escort carrier and a few DDs/DEs protecting a convoy from a wolfpack.  

Another interesting scenario might be a carrier duel at long range, each carrier escorted by 2 or 3 DD bots that ONLY move in conjunction with the carrier to provide anti-aircraft support.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,299
[-BUI-]
Members
2,703 posts
7,030 battles
8 minutes ago, Rustyhole said:

Let cancer play with cancer.

Can we extend that to poor players as well?   Nothing is more cancer than the player who charges forward, gives full broadside and dies 2m into the game.

  • Cool 2
  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,073
[SALVO]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
6,352 posts
6,951 battles

Yeah so without the CV the meta devolves into camping HE SPAM fire fests. 

Nothing gives me greater joy than deleting someone camping behind an island lobbing HE over it without a chance to get hit back.

  • Sad 1
  • Boring 3
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,558
[S0L0]
[S0L0]
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters
5,015 posts
7,823 battles

Can we have a separate place in forums for :etc_swear: posting...   So the rest of us can enjoy the forums without the excessively stupid :etc_swear:

  • Cool 4
  • Thanks 3
  • Boring 3
  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
266
Beta Testers
237 posts
12,285 battles

Can we put all the smoke hiders into a separate game too please so that the real men can fight it out.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,201
[TDRB]
Members
5,313 posts
13,743 battles
12 minutes ago, Dr_Venture said:

Yeah so without the CV the meta devolves into camping HE SPAM fire fests. 

Nothing gives me greater joy than deleting someone camping behind an island lobbing HE over it without a chance to get hit back.

HE spamming is still very much part of the game. This has not changed.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,201
[TDRB]
Members
5,313 posts
13,743 battles
32 minutes ago, michael_zahnle said:

I wouldn't mind a sub hunting scenario between a light/escort carrier and a few DDs/DEs protecting a convoy from a wolfpack.  

Another interesting scenario might be a carrier duel at long range, each carrier escorted by 2 or 3 DD bots that ONLY move in conjunction with the carrier to provide anti-aircraft support.

I could go for that. But that would take a course reversal as WG is taking steps to drive players from running OPs.

39 minutes ago, Learux said:

 That way the over and underwater world can go damage  each other and the rest of the players play surface ships.

While WG may change their mind at this time I don't see it happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,436
[SALVO]
Members
3,503 posts
7,388 battles
54 minutes ago, Learux said:

 That way the over and underwater world can go damage  each other and the rest of the players play surface ships.

 

 

What a beautiful dream. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,843
[WOLF1]
Members
6,321 posts

Sure.  Soon as I get select buttons to not play with the other classes, too.

If you want opt-outs, then make them for everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,894
[PVE]
Members
7,327 posts

I actually think this is a very good idea.  While I don't know if WG will do it, I won't be the least bit surprised if they did.  What I don't understand is people railing against it without giving it any thought.  Why couldn't WG make this a fun game mode that you want to play?  People have been asking for new game modes, and WG could start with a fresh slate in the concept instead of just making it randoms with CV/subs.  If this was done well it could make the game better.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
398
[SPTR]
Members
4,021 posts
1,021 battles
1 minute ago, Slimeball91 said:

What I don't understand is people railing against it without giving it any thought. 

Because it's a horrid idea? You did read it RIGHT? Mainly the part where it's making it so CVs and SSs are only capable of fighting each other and none of the other ship classes...

  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,894
[PVE]
Members
7,327 posts
1 minute ago, 6Xero9 said:

Because it's a horrid idea? You did read it RIGHT? Mainly the part where it's making it so CVs and SSs are only capable of fighting each other and none of the other ship classes...

Except it doesn't have to be that way.  The concept is simple, a new game mode.  It could be very different, and include all ship types or exclude some ship types.  If CVs were restricted to this this new game mode their balancing could be done very differently.  They could be made powerful like they were historically.  If this new mode was done well players would want to play, even if CVs were made to be the top dogs.  Something like this could take the game in another direction for players that find the current game boring.  It's an opportunity for a fresh start in an already established game.  

  • Boring 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
289
[CLRN]
Members
609 posts
122 battles
3 hours ago, iRA6E said:

Can we have a separate place in forums for :etc_swear: posting...   So the rest of us can enjoy the forums without the excessively stupid :etc_swear:

Show us the person who is forcing you to click the topics you call :etc_swear: 

:Smile_facepalm:

Edited by ghostbuster_
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,220
[SIM]
Members
5,848 posts
9,315 battles

As long as I get to whine enough about DDs to get them out of the main game, too. Oh, and BBs when I’m playing a cruiser. And Paper when I pick Rock.

  • Cool 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,672
[CLUMP]
Members
1,891 posts
2,412 battles

Can we put the DD bros in a separated game mode so they can ninja torp each :Smile_popcorn:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,630
[PVE]
Members
8,500 posts
24,587 battles
1 hour ago, iRA6E said:

Can we have a separate place in forums for :etc_swear: posting...   So the rest of us can enjoy the forums without the excessively stupid :etc_swear:

Attention everybody...i:etc_swear:would like us to stop RA6ING on the forums...

Sorry...on your side on the issue...but the irony man :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,286
[RKLES]
Members
964 posts
2 hours ago, iRA6E said:

Can we have a separate place in forums for :etc_swear: posting...   So the rest of us can enjoy the forums without the excessively stupid :etc_swear:

You are just jealous that you didn't come up with this great idea!

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,003
[REVY]
Members
2,824 posts
15,037 battles
2 hours ago, Learux said:

 That way the over and underwater world can go damage  each other and the rest of the players play surface ships.

very well.

 

Then we also need a game mode for only DDs.

Another one that's only BBs.

etc.

The game is called 'World of Warships'. Warships include CVs and Submarines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,286
[RKLES]
Members
964 posts

You seem to forget that we were promised to never have submarines and CV's have changed to cater to the lowest common denominator.

I don't appreciate a product change after I spend good money on it.

I think it is an elegant fix to the CV debacle and a good way to introduce subs.

Please discuss some more.

  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×