Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Illustratum_AEternam

Al littorio is Roma

32 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Testers
555 posts
12,096 battles

go undress the Azur Lane skin and you see Roma

on the Stern

I don't have the ship, but you can clearly see if you bought Al littorio  

image.png

  • Funny 4
  • Haha 2
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,266
[EQRN]
Members
2,244 posts
20,563 battles

Seeing a few people claiming it has sap, you know someone is going to buy it based on that and be severely disappointed, leading to a rash of CS complaints WG only has itself to blame.

Edited by FrodoFraggin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,754
[WOLF8]
Members
8,126 posts
6,782 battles

I heard that the Roma's crest is also visible on AL Littorio's ship model as well, even with the camo on. Go figure, lol. :Smile_smile:

Edited by Blorgh2017

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
884 posts
5,968 battles
8 minutes ago, Primace said:

go undress the Azur Lane skin and you see Roma

on the Stern

I don't have the ship, but you can clearly see if you bought Al littorio  

image.png

Lol that’s HILARIOUS! Don’t get me wrong, I love my Roma but trying to pass this reskin off on people is just wrong. They took away the SAP and smoke and now it’s just a Roma. Lmfaooooo!

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,551
[SYN]
Members
8,256 posts
14,118 battles

The fact all the AL ships are copies of tech tree ships is no secret. Pretty lazy to not even remove the Roma badge though. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,180
[PISD]
Members
1,921 posts
6,338 battles
4 minutes ago, Kapitan_Wuff said:

The fact all the AL ships are copies of tech tree ships is no secret. Pretty lazy to not even remove the Roma badge though. 

The other had at least some gimmick: Montpellier had better sygma/ longer reload, Yukikaze have a completely different play style due to the F8 torpedoes...

 

but in this case, it’s not even the Littorio. Littorio had a different bow and some other differences, while here they made a “Roma with camo”, after letting the illusion that she would have SAP and smoke. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
517
[WOLFA]
Members
853 posts
7,978 battles

It says right in the description in the premium shop that "it's modeled after the Roma".

So you're buying a Roma with Weeb camo and squeaky  annoying captain :Smile_facepalm:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,678
Beta Testers
4,735 posts
7,019 battles

IMAGINE BUYING ROMA AGAIN FOR DOUBLE DISSAPOINTMENT.

  • Funny 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
478
[CAZA]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
531 posts
6,950 battles
2 minutes ago, Cruxdei said:

IMAGINE BUYING ROMA AGAIN FOR DOUBLE DISSAPOINTMENT.

Imagine thinking Roma is a disappointment

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,093
[SMLSK]
Beta Testers
1,409 posts
2,241 battles
Just now, Torenico said:

Imagine thinking Roma is a disappointment

That I don't get. I love my Roma and watching enemy BB's bounce shells off my bow in complete futility is a great feeling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,678
Beta Testers
4,735 posts
7,019 battles
4 minutes ago, otakuben said:

That I don't get. I love my Roma and watching enemy BB's bounce shells off my bow in complete futility is a great feeling.

most tier8 bbs can do that,it's nothing new.

roma problem comes from the temperamental AP ammo,sure they are "good" but wows is a casino game,with rng not playing in your favor most of the time.

and that super poor AA is a big problem against CVs.

unicums can make turds shine in the battle,but i hardly see that ship performing well with the average player(the majority)

Edited by Cruxdei

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,093
[SMLSK]
Beta Testers
1,409 posts
2,241 battles
9 minutes ago, Cruxdei said:

most tier8 bbs can do that,it's nothing new.

roma problem comes from the temperamental AP ammo,sure they are "good" but wows is a casino game,with rng not playing in your favor most of the time.

and that super poor AA is a big problem against CVs.

unicums can make turds shine in the battle,but i hardly see that ship performing well with the average player(the majority)

I'm not saying it's a great ship. I've been very outspoken about it needing buffs but saying it's some big disappointment is just dishonest. I love my Roma and wouldn't give it up for the world. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,944
[GWG]
[GWG]
Alpha Tester
28,337 posts
14,924 battles

The Roma is a Littorio class so using the Roma model makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,180
[PISD]
Members
1,921 posts
6,338 battles
56 minutes ago, BrushWolf said:

The Roma is a Littorio class so using the Roma model makes sense.

The Roma was quite different from the Littorio, being the third ships. Roma for instance have a clipper bow while Littorio have a linear one. Toma have 1 anchor in the bow per side while Littorio have 2....

 

https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/64631-whats-the-difference-littorio-class/

Edited by Y_Nagato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,944
[GWG]
[GWG]
Alpha Tester
28,337 posts
14,924 battles
Just now, Y_Nagato said:

The Roma was quite different from the Littorio, being the third ships. Roma for instance have a clipper bow while Littorio have a linear one. Toma have 1 anchor in the bow per side while Littorio have 2....

While WG goes for lots of correct detail they have never tried to be 100% true for the different ships in the class.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,180
[PISD]
Members
1,921 posts
6,338 battles
8 minutes ago, BrushWolf said:

While WG goes for lots of correct detail they have never tried to be 100% true for the different ships in the class.

While truth, they did try to make them different and keep the original design. Alabama and Mass are not identical for instance. Here it is pure laziness. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12,853
[WOLF3]
Members
30,982 posts
26,039 battles
2 hours ago, Primace said:

go undress the Azur Lane skin and you see Roma

on the Stern

I don't have the ship, but you can clearly see if you bought Al littorio  

image.png

59 minutes ago, HyPeXeLeD said:

/shrug

 

bfe3a6da84.jpg

 

Really?  Wow! :Smile_teethhappy: This was lazy work on WG's part.

Edited by HazeGrayUnderway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,944
[GWG]
[GWG]
Alpha Tester
28,337 posts
14,924 battles
2 minutes ago, Y_Nagato said:

While truth, they did try to make them different and keep the original design. Alabama and Mass are not identical for instance. Here it is pure laziness. 

I wonder if they got the deal too late to do the differences so they went with a camo instead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
130
[W-P-E]
[W-P-E]
Members
427 posts
26,117 battles

The car and truck are still at same spot, standard equipment...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12,853
[WOLF3]
Members
30,982 posts
26,039 battles
9 minutes ago, BrushWolf said:

I wonder if they got the deal too late to do the differences so they went with a camo instead?

Back in April the JP staff for Azur Lane announced the 3rd collab with WoWS.

https://twinfinite.net/2020/04/azur-lane-new-event-sakura/

How much further back all this was being done, not sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,180
[PISD]
Members
1,921 posts
6,338 battles
11 minutes ago, BrushWolf said:

I wonder if they got the deal too late to do the differences so they went with a camo instead?

Impero was in testing since 3-4 month, and regardless if it was gonna be the Littorio like the files said (see LWM) or the Vittorio Venitio, both those ships were almost identical.

 

 

and if they don’t already have a model of the Littorio work on I would be surprise

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,944
[GWG]
[GWG]
Alpha Tester
28,337 posts
14,924 battles
13 minutes ago, HazeGrayUnderway said:

Back in April the JP staff for Azur Lane announced the 3rd collab with WoWS.

https://twinfinite.net/2020/04/azur-lane-new-event-sakura/

How much further back all this was being done, not sure.

Hard to say but it takes a long time to get the details correct and it is only a few months since that announcement.

5 minutes ago, Y_Nagato said:

Impero was in testing since 3-4 month, and regardless if it was gonna be the Littorio like the files said (see LWM) or the Vittorio Venitio, both those ships were almost identical.

 

 

and if they don’t already have a model of the Littorio work on I would be surprise

 

 

Impero was the Roma but with smoke and SAP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×