Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
NoZoupForYou

German CV First Impressions

19 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

3,518
[WG-CC]
WoWS Community Contributors
1,670 posts
6,345 battles

Overall impressions of German CVs.  Fortunately I feel they aren't that great against DDs which is welcome relief for DDs.  They offer a different style of gameplay from other CVs which is nice, and a good change of pace.  I think CV mains will enjoy them, but that's just me.

 

 

  • Cool 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,702
[INTEL]
Members
13,054 posts
36,011 battles

Rockets were stupid. AP rockets? That's piling idiotic on top of stupid. What a waste of dev time and resources....

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,481
[-K-]
Members
8,333 posts
14,112 battles
Just now, Taichunger said:

Rockets were are stupid. 

Fixed that for you.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,343
[WUDPS]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
5,894 posts
5,627 battles

I'm excited, I'm a German CV main.

I'm buying the tier 6 CV solely for the Stukas.

  • Cool 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41
[ROTTN]
[ROTTN]
Members
22 posts
19,547 battles

This is just stupid.  Italian battleships or destroyers of which there were many in WWII.... NOOOOO, we get German CV's that didn't even exist on a napkin.

  • Cool 4
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
464
[D-H-O]
Beta Testers
1,161 posts
10,892 battles

1st Impression:

 

Oh yawn - more CV  

WG need to fix AA before adding more planes.

  • Cool 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,497
[RKLES]
Members
12,551 posts
14,267 battles
55 minutes ago, Alfa66 said:

This is just stupid.  Italian battleships or destroyers of which there were many in WWII.... NOOOOO, we get German CV's that didn't even exist on a napkin.

I agree 100%, we keep begging and pleaded no for WG to add Italian BBs, and instead they add more RU CAs, EU DDs, and now more CVs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,585
[-BUI-]
Members
2,024 posts
5,682 battles

You heard it here, CVs that increase your loss rate, due to being ineffective against DDs is "good for the game".    :cap_book:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,254
[SPTR]
Members
27,145 posts
16,386 battles

Lets be honest Im not the only one wondering if their secondaries will be good or not.

Edited by Rolkatsuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,704
[A-D-F]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
7,520 posts
1 hour ago, Alfa66 said:

This is just stupid.  Italian battleships or destroyers of which there were many in WWII.... NOOOOO, we get German CV's that didn't even exist on a napkin.

Wows adding made up ships isn't exactly a new thing.

Weser was planned and conversion work actually began, but was never finished.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,482
[WOLF8]
Members
7,344 posts
6,239 battles
4 minutes ago, Rolkatsuki said:

Lets be honest Im not the only one wondering if their secondaries will be good or not.

WeeGee recently buffed their secondaries to have an accuracy like that of Massachusetts... or so I heard. So they should be good on that front.

The real issue that I heard is that they don't have enough secondary guns to make it worthwhile, except the Tier X one. Even then, on the Tier X one, it's just a bunch of dual purpose 105mm guns... at least they fire fast, so they should set fires quite nicely, lol. :Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
213
[D-H-O]
Alpha Tester
993 posts
1 hour ago, Alfa66 said:

This is just stupid.  Italian battleships or destroyers of which there were many in WWII.... NOOOOO, we get German CV's that didn't even exist on a napkin.

Just wait for the inevitable RU CV line...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,704
[A-D-F]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
7,520 posts
Just now, gbgentry said:

Just wait for the inevitable RU CV line...

I can't wait! (not sarcasm).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
358
[LLF]
Beta Testers
559 posts

@NoZoupForYou hey great review, I have a question in regards to their secondaries. I noticed you didn't talk about them at all in your review, was there a particular reason as why? Also congrats on the little ones, I'm also a first time dad so I greatly understand what your currently dealing with. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
833 posts
5,794 battles

I LOL’d at the Zara story. When my daughter was first born I felt like I was going through seal training with all the sleep deprivation. 
 

quick question for you lads...I haven’t heard the penetration on these rockets. I’m curious as that’ll effect target selection and shot placement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3
[AN2AC]
Members
11 posts
22,688 battles

For me Its wait and see though i expect them to be awful versus DDs might have to spec them for secondaries  to just have a snowballs chance in hell

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×