Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Commadore_Crunch

New US BBs.....FORTY SECOND RELOAD???

83 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

94
[WARGS]
Members
77 posts
9,351 battles

 

So the current stats show a 40 second reload on the main guns on the new US BB Split? , yes they are in development but...what player is going to play a ship with 40 seconds for a reload in a BB?

Russian Bias much??

  • Cool 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,520
[WOLF7]
Members
12,620 posts

WG excels at under performing US ships, so they can sell you Mass and Georgia....:Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
362
[DOG]
Members
1,357 posts
15,002 battles

Yeah, that will be rough, especially if their accuracy sucks.  At least with the tier IX and X you can get it down to 35.2 seconds, and with 12 guns each, you can stagger the forward and rear turrets if it really bothers you, firing 6 guns every 20 seconds or so if no one gives you a juicy broadside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,761
[WDS]
[WDS]
Members
4,954 posts
14,224 battles

Yea but the good news is you can grab a beer  make yourself a cheeseburger and be back in time to fire again. 

  • Cool 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
804
[NMKJT]
Members
3,755 posts
8,996 battles
12 minutes ago, Commadore_Crunch said:

So the current stats show a 40 second reload on the main guns on the new US BB Split? , yes they are in development but...what player is going to play a ship with 40 seconds for a reload in a BB?

Russian Bias much??

The VMF ships with lower broadside weight are also above 30s, but you can decrease it in either case with MBM3 (except at t8). They're just not as long because they can't cause other ships to evaporate in one volley as easily as these things. In the end I bet WG adjusts their reload down despite how horrifying it will be to stuff that gets caught out by them. 1.7 sigma on 12 16" guns at T8?

But no, let's cry rUsSiAn BiAs instead lmbo.

  • Cool 2
  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
383
[WAP]
Members
713 posts
18,506 battles
9 minutes ago, zubalkabir said:

Yeah, that will be rough, especially if their accuracy sucks.  At least with the tier IX and X you can get it down to 35.2 seconds, and with 12 guns each, you can stagger the forward and rear turrets if it really bothers you, firing 6 guns every 20 seconds or so if no one gives you a juicy broadside.

1.7 sigma across the board.  Think Lyon...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
354
[SUNK-]
Members
250 posts
7,093 battles

The kremlin has a 33 second reload with 9 guns, and I don't think anyone is saying that it is weak. So 40 second reload on 12 guns may not be that bad. Granted the kremlin gets accuracy perks at closer range and Russian shell ballistics, maybe the American alt line will get some special perks (Great secondaries would be awesome, make the things slow mobile fortresses).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
333
[SNGNS]
Members
611 posts
7,126 battles
2 minutes ago, TheCompGuy25 said:

1.7 sigma across the board.  Think Lyon...

the thing about Lyon is that it gets French accuracy which is German accuracy. American accuracy is way better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,839
[SIDE]
Members
4,939 posts
17 minutes ago, zubalkabir said:

Yeah, that will be rough, especially if their accuracy sucks.  At least with the tier IX and X you can get it down to 35.2 seconds, and with 12 guns each, you can stagger the forward and rear turrets if it really bothers you, firing 6 guns every 20 seconds or so if no one gives you a juicy broadside.

You don't want lightly armored ships this big and slow turned enough to stagger the rear turrets.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,839
[SIDE]
Members
4,939 posts
On 7/4/2020 at 1:22 PM, JimmyTheRealPirate said:

The kremlin has a 33 second reload with 9 guns, and I don't think anyone is saying that it is weak. So 40 second reload on 12 guns may not be that bad. Granted the kremlin gets accuracy perks at closer range and Russian shell ballistics, maybe the American alt line will get some special perks (Great secondaries would be awesome, make the things slow mobile fortresses).

Kremlin that has accuracy perks that actually work at all ranges in game. Fixed.

Edited by thebigblue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,386
[WORX]
Members
16,147 posts
21,842 battles
17 minutes ago, Commadore_Crunch said:

 

So the current stats show a 40 second reload on the main guns on the new US BB Split? , yes they are in development but...what player is going to play a ship with 40 seconds for a reload in a BB?

Russian Bias much??

So far, USN BBs are accurate... The other BBs in the game need the nerf bat (especially the high tier ones).

They have 4 turrets mounts with triple guns.. That is a lot of fire power and not enough threats against (other then Fire) to balance out the threats.

 

  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,561
[SYN]
Members
8,288 posts
14,453 battles

They are still WiP so that is likely to change with testing. However, they have lots of big guns so long reload seems like a valid balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,699
[SIM]
Members
6,265 posts
10,284 battles

Hey everybody! Let’s focus on one stat in a vacuum and pretend like that’s definitive!!!! :cap_book:

  • Funny 1
  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
456
[BOYS]
Members
455 posts
7,383 battles

Yeah they all look horrible from the initial stats. For me the biggest issue is the 23 knot speed, its just so bad. It should be at least 25 or 26.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
288
[FDK]
Members
1,492 posts
1 hour ago, Commadore_Crunch said:

 

So the current stats show a 40 second reload on the main guns on the new US BB Split? , yes they are in development but...what player is going to play a ship with 40 seconds for a reload in a BB?

Russian Bias much??

35 Seconds would be nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
591
[SOCOM]
Members
875 posts
29,838 battles

What do you expect. They have to field ships from drawing boards of the 50 - 60's just to compete, wonder if there will be a bounty on american ships

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,063
[WOLF8]
[WOLF8]
Members
8,834 posts
7,115 battles

If I were WeeGee and if I wanted to keep their atrocious 40 seconds reload, then I would consider giving other facets of the main guns some buffs. Maybe a tiny more damage per shell, a bit better penetration, a bit better shell velocity, a great air drag ratio, and etc... but that's just me. :Smile_hiding:

It looks to me like these new USN BB's are kinds of ships that put all their eggs in one basket labeled "Atrociously slow but super heavy devastating salvo." Better make your shots count, I guess. Then again, that has already been the name of the game for the existing USN standards in the game, I suppose... lol. :Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
438
[XXX]
Members
751 posts
1,751 battles
9 minutes ago, Blorgh2017 said:

If I were WeeGee and if I wanted to keep their atrocious 40 seconds reload, then I would consider giving other facets of the main guns some buffs. Maybe a tiny more damage per shell, a bit better penetration, a bit better shell velocity, a great air drag ratio, and etc... but that's just me. :Smile_hiding:

It looks to me like these new USN BB's are kinds of ships that put all their eggs in one basket labeled "Atrociously slow but super heavy devastating salvo." Better make your shots count, I guess. Then again, that has already been the name of the game for the existing USN standards in the game, I suppose... lol. :Smile_hiding:

The funny thing is...there were ships designed entirely around focusing on guns over all else, including speed and Armor...know what they were...Monitors and Coastal Ships.

That's what these US BBs are...they're not Battleships, they're Monitors on steroids.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monitor_(warship)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,704
[MISRY]
Members
1,218 posts
8,747 battles

I'm interested in most new lines. This is a dud for me. There is nothing about these ships that other ships don't do better. I'll be quite happy playing my Ohio over this new garbage tier 10. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,543
[WMD]
Members
2,076 posts
11,938 battles
1 hour ago, Commadore_Crunch said:

 

So the current stats show a 40 second reload on the main guns on the new US BB Split? , yes they are in development but...what player is going to play a ship with 40 seconds for a reload in a BB?

Russian Bias much??

How would you balance 12 18" guns?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
477 posts
10,099 battles

US Standards are designed for armor and gunfire.  Speed only needs to be able to keep the battle line together.  Having oceans as your main defense and being isolationistic at the time, Americans would force the enemy to come to them.  No need to chase the enemy down in the open ocean.  If you want to take an American port that, you will have to get past the line of battleships which probably have more guns than you do, and have 'all or nothing' armor.  At least that was the plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
295
[SKDSH]
Members
707 posts
11,112 battles
1 hour ago, Commadore_Crunch said:

 

So the current stats show a 40 second reload on the main guns on the new US BB Split? , yes they are in development but...what player is going to play a ship with 40 seconds for a reload in a BB?

Russian Bias much??

Pretty sure the USN guns will have higher alpha to compensate. Kremlin shells only do 14.5 per cit where as USN 457s on GA, and OH, do 15.75 per cit. Maybe Vermont's alpha will be even higher. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37,580
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
26,737 posts
24,230 battles
1 hour ago, SkaerKrow said:

Hey everybody! Let’s focus on one stat in a vacuum and pretend like that’s definitive!!!! :cap_book:

Of course. That's how the WG forums do.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
477 posts
10,099 battles

Vermont has probably the highest alpha in the game with twelve 18"guns.  Even Yamato doesn't have that kind of broadside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×