Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Sour_Kraut365

Why no german T10 heavy cruiser?

19 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

27
[WHARF]
Members
45 posts
20,242 battles

This is something that just boggles my mind and would like an answer from anyone who might have an idea of what the hell happened. The Sigfried was supposed to be a T10 heavy from its conception a couple years ago if I remember correctly. Why would WG then put it with the Odin and have 2 freaking T9 heavies, and no T10? Is it just that WG didnt want to create anything that can go against their precious russian heavies like the Stalingrad or to take on the PR? Is there an even remotely good reason for no german T10 heavy, or is WG being themselves and just wrecking a great idea? In my mind they had the chance to do it right, but blew it....again. Any ideas on why the omission?

Edited by joegils1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
621
[BOTO]
Members
1,485 posts
20,586 battles
33 minutes ago, joegils1 said:

This is something that just boggles my mind and would like an answer from anyone who might have an idea of what the hell happened. The Sigfried was supposed to be a T10 heavy from its conception a couple years ago if I remember correctly. Why would WG then put it with the Odin and have 2 freaking T9 heavies, and no T10? Is it just that WG didnt want to create anything that can go against their precious russian heavies like the Stalingrad or to take on the PR? Is there an even remotely good reason for no german T10 heavy, or is WG being themselves and just wrecking a great idea? In my mind they had the chance to do it right, but blew it....again. Any ideas on why the omission?

What's wrong with Hindenburg?  I have no problem taking on PR or Stalingrad in mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,291
[ARS]
Beta Testers
7,590 posts
8,278 battles
21 minutes ago, joegils1 said:

This is something that just boggles my mind and would like an answer from anyone who might have an idea of what the hell happened. The Sigfried was supposed to be a T10 heavy from its conception a couple years ago if I remember correctly. Why would WG then put it with the Odin and have 2 freaking T9 heavies, and no T10? Is it just that WG didnt want to create anything that can go against their precious russian heavies like the Stalingrad or to take on the PR? Is there an even remotely good reason for no german T10 heavy, or is WG being themselves and just wrecking a great idea? In my mind they had the chance to do it right, but blew it....again. Any ideas on why the omission?

You remember incorrectly.  Siegfried was always at Tier IX.  Agir was added later, also at Tier IX.  No Tier X German cruiser has been announced, but Sigfriend and Agir were just released.  Give them some time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
288
[FDK]
Members
1,492 posts
1 hour ago, joegils1 said:

This is something that just boggles my mind and would like an answer from anyone who might have an idea of what the hell happened. The Sigfried was supposed to be a T10 heavy from its conception a couple years ago if I remember correctly. Why would WG then put it with the Odin and have 2 freaking T9 heavies, and no T10? Is it just that WG didnt want to create anything that can go against their precious russian heavies like the Stalingrad or to take on the PR? Is there an even remotely good reason for no german T10 heavy, or is WG being themselves and just wrecking a great idea? In my mind they had the chance to do it right, but blew it....again. Any ideas on why the omission?

You seem to be a little confused.

Germans have indeed a Heavy Cruiser, and it's name is Hinderburg.

On the other hand; Pueto Rico, Azuma, Siegfried, etc. are "Large Cruisers" (Though, I like more the term "Super Cruiser")

 

Edited by Xwing_Red1
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,063
[WOLF8]
[WOLF8]
Members
8,834 posts
7,115 battles
5 minutes ago, Xwing_Red1 said:

You seem to be a little confused.

Germans have indeed a Heavy Cruiser, and it's name is Hinderburg.

On the other hand; Pueto Rico, Azuma, Siegfried, etc. are "Large Cruisers" (Though, I like more the term "Super Cruiser")

 

hes-right-you-know.jpg.2de6bb15f165f602bfee2d79fcc3461a.jpg

It looks to me like the OP needs to look up and learn about the classifications of different ship types.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,543
[WMD]
Members
2,076 posts
11,938 battles

Germany just got two T9 large cruisers... I'd say it's safe to say germany is not being sidelined, or ignored. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22
[TURTS]
Members
28 posts
10,118 battles

isnt seigfried coming eventually

 

edit: oh wait thats a T9. tbh i wasnt paying attention cuz they seem so bad

 

Edited by ixnehc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
534
Members
558 posts
5,048 battles
53 minutes ago, VeatherVitch said:

Germany just got two T9 large cruisers... I'd say it's safe to say germany is not being sidelined, or ignored. 

They only get ignored when it comes to ships that are actually any good! :cap_look:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
827 posts
10,893 battles
3 hours ago, joegils1 said:

WG didnt want to create anything that can go against their precious russian heavies like the Stalingrad or to take on the PR?

There are many ships that can counter a Stalingrad or Puerto Rico, including German ships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15,218
[WOLF5]
Members
34,966 posts
29,058 battles
1 hour ago, ixnehc said:

isnt seigfried coming eventually

 

edit: oh wait thats a T9. tbh i wasnt paying attention cuz they seem so bad

 

If you think Siegfried is bad then you're a lost lamb.

 

Battleship guns with true Cruiser Accuracy and armor better than what Cruisers typically have.  She perfectly straddles the line between BB power & protection, and Cruiser handling and gunnery.

36 minutes ago, Heed_04 said:

Give them time, German Supercruiser will come.

They're already here in the form of Siegfried & Agir.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
72
[TNG-2]
Members
223 posts
16,422 battles
5 hours ago, HazeGrayUnderway said:

If you think Siegfried is bad then you're a lost lamb.

 

Battleship guns with true Cruiser Accuracy and armor better than what Cruisers typically have.  She perfectly straddles the line between BB power & protection, and Cruiser handling and gunnery.

They're already here in the form of Siegfried & Agir.

Tier 10, only looking for the tier 10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27
[WHARF]
Members
45 posts
20,242 battles

Well well well....I must apologize. I always though the Hindy was a light cruiser because of the 203 guns and the iffy armor and the bow with not-so-good deflection angles...plus it doesnt handle anything like a light cruiser. Welp...I stand corrected. Ive had the Hindy for a long time and its my go-to CA...but it doesnt tank like a heavy..and the Turtleback is not what it used to be. Anyhoo, still love it, but its been changed a bit since I got it so I gotta use it as a kiter instead of a brawler like it was supposed to be.

Plus....the 2 T9 heavies coming out at the same time in the same class/nation just fried my mind and made no sense.

Edited by joegils1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,763
[CMFRT]
[CMFRT]
Banned
16,985 posts
17 minutes ago, joegils1 said:

Well well well....I must apologize. I always though the Hindy was a light cruiser because of the 203 guns and the iffy armor and the bow with not-so-good deflection angles...plus it doesnt handle anything like a light cruiser. Welp...I stand corrected. Ive had the Hindy for a long time and its my go-to CA...but it doesnt tank like a heavy..and the Turtleback is not what it used to be. Anyhoo, still love it, but its been changed a bit since I got it so I gotta use it as a kiter instead of a brawler like it was supposed to be.

Plus....the 2 T9 heavies coming out at the same time in the same class/nation just fried my mind and made no sense.

Iffy armor?   Bad deflection angles?

:Smile_teethhappy:

Never mind that 203mm guns is pretty much the definition of "heavy cruiser".

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27
[WHARF]
Members
45 posts
20,242 battles

I thought they had heavier than 203 plus heavier displacement. Daaaaamn....nevermind me...I'll shut up now.

Edited by joegils1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,763
[CMFRT]
[CMFRT]
Banned
16,985 posts
5 minutes ago, joegils1 said:

I thought they had heavier than 203 plus heavier displacement. Daaaaamn....nevermind me...I'll shut up now.

Check the US cruiser lines on the US tech tree.

Light -- Helena to Worcester

Heavy -- Pensacola to Des Moines.

"Super" or "Large" -- Alaska.

 

Edited by KilljoyCutter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×