Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
brian333

Destroyer Leaders and Torpedo Cruisers

6 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Alpha Tester
1,606 posts
1,149 battles

Destroyers are small, purpose built ships. They have one mission: to kill anything which threatens their capital ships. They do not carry ship's troops nor do they have accomodations for flag officers. They lack the massive communication suites a command ship requires, and they are always considered expendable assets, (which is why they made so many in every navy.)

 

However, as destroyer squadrons still needed command and control functions both at sea and administratively, a larger class of ship was needed to operate with them. The British used Light Cruisers for this purpose, but British destroyers were very much short-range ships, heavily dependant upon strategic assets such as tenders, replinishment ships, and oilers. Both the USN and IJN had to operate destroyers in the wide open Pacific, and these ships required much longer range and duration on station than Atlantic fleet destroyers. And both navies came up with a similar answer, but called them by different names.

 

For the USN, the Destroyer Leader, and for the Japanese, the Torpedo Cruiser, were the answer to this problem. They incorporated Destroyer level maneuverability and weaponry onto a larger hull, which allowed greater fuel capacity and additional space for Flag Officer accomodations. Though designed to operate with destroyers, their primary mission was command and control. With superior range and stores to allow longer durations on station, the squadron commander could remain on station even when his squadron units took turns returning to tenders or bases for refueling and replenishment.

 

Though never built in large numbers by either side, these ships played a critical role in coordinating destroyer activity. While their individual accomplishments on the field of battle weren't significant in most cases, their true accomplishment, that of keeping the DD's in line and effective during a campaign, was vital in the vast Pacific Theater.

 

After the war, subsequent USN destroyer design incorporated the assets of the DL, and overall larger destroyers allowed the DL to be phased out. The Japanese, requiring only coastal defense, opted for ever samller warships, and the Torpedo Cruiser was no longer necessary for their naval mission.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
63
Members
300 posts
35 battles

DL and TC look like they will be fun to play. I suspect the main difference between them and regular destroyers will be extra HP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
525 posts

I will disappoint you: British had leaders too. Before WW2 almost every bigger destroyer class was considered a leader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
1,606 posts
1,149 battles

I didn't consider the six Scott Class DL's because they came into WW1 late and were farmed out to the Dominion Fleets by the mid 30's. However, it is true the RN did build DL's at one point.

Edited by brian333

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
1,606 posts
1,149 battles

I stand corrected.

 

Apparently my source mis-identified the larger destroyers the RN built alongside the DD classes as CL's instead of DL's. What I discovered is that after WWI, while the RN did not build classes of ships specifically as Destroyer Leaders, they did 'stretch' one or two units of every class of destroyer to provide additional tonnage for Flag accomodations, along with additional fuel, and in some cases an extra gun.

 

Thanks for teaching me something I thought I knew, nixxie!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
661
Alpha Tester
1,275 posts
241 battles

DLs were in the London naval treaty. A certain percentage of DDs were allowed to be larger than the normal limit to serve as leaders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×