Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017

Motion to give CV player negative XPs if friendly BBs got sunk on his watch

22 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
561 posts
2,178 battles

100% of the time I don't know what they are doing.

I keep running into [edited] ones on my team.

I dunno. Give them -150 XP for every friendly BB sunk by enemy CVs.

 

I think that's fair.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 5
  • Boring 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,365
Members
2,687 posts
4,393 battles

Sure.  Just as soon as cruisers get negative XP for destroyers getting sunk on their watch,  or BB's get negative experience for cruisers sunk on their watch,  and destroyers get negative experience for carriers getting sunk on their watch.  In other words,  NO,  and that's a stupid idea.

  • Cool 5
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,030
[WOLFG]
Members
34,394 posts
10,709 battles
3 minutes ago, AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017 said:

100% of the time I don't know what they are doing.

I keep running into [edited] ones on my team.

I dunno. Give them -150 XP for every friendly BB sunk by enemy CVs.

 

I think that's fair.

Tell you what.

Show us the match results of you playing 20 games in a T6+ CV, and if there are no more than 5 friendly BBs lost in total, I'll back you 100%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,926
[KSC]
WoWS Community Contributors
1,658 posts
14,379 battles
8 minutes ago, AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017 said:

100% of the time I don't know what they are doing.

I keep running into [edited] ones on my team.

I dunno. Give them -150 XP for every friendly BB sunk by enemy CVs.

 

I think that's fair.

Sure.  Do CVs get bonus XP when their teammates die alone, though?  I feel like the people that sail off alone just to spam the "I need AA support" button should be fined.

AA Buddies.  You only need one.

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,575
[SGSS]
Members
6,309 posts

Lololololol this is by far the worst/best troll of a terrable idea in the history of ideas.

Clearly you are the greatest CV player in history that has won every game in your CV and under your amazing watch not a single ship on the green team was sunk.

Its an amazing run by the greatest CV player ever played a CV and if you cant do that surfs then you don't have the right as per decrea to play ever again.

No matter the situation.  Even if you on the 1 line and a BB in on the 10 line alone and spaming for AA the op was able to support that BB and the BB on the 1 line and the bb on the 5 line with only 1 plane in the air at a time.

If you surfs cant figure it out then you dont have the right to play anything at all.

OP I dont know if your joking or not but you should revalute this post and see the obserity of it all.

How is a CV suppose to provide fighter cover with fighter cover (that you probably don't thing works anyway) to every spot on the map at the same time?

How is anyone sppose to keep every ship alive the whole game when they arnt the one using it?

What about the rest of the team that spaming AA support?  Is the CV suppose to not drop fighter over the DD and CA now because of the decrea that BB are the only thing thats important?

What about what the CV wants? The CV is not your personal air force.  

Planes are not omipotant powerful god like entities that accend from the heavens and blast the enemy with lighting bolts from the sky.  They are simi fragile things that can die fast.

This is a game and should be emjkyed by everyone maybe you should take a few days off then come back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,539
[D-DAY]
Members
7,163 posts

:cap_haloween:…...This is a joke, yes? :cap_wander:

It's a team game - BBs (or indeed any ship type player) are more likely to die because of their own mistakes before that of another player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,513
[HINON]
Members
14,340 posts
1 minute ago, CaptainKaitoGhost said:

Consider the OP, and his previous topics.

 

Trolls gonna troll.

 

This ^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
305
[PVE]
Members
1,147 posts
9,763 battles

Do you propose BBs lose XP for pretending to be a Des Moines by hiding behind islands and asking squishy cruisers to tank and spot for them?

Do you propose that BBs lose XP for tanking less than 1M damage?

Do you propose BBs lose XP for yolo rushing and dieing in the first 3 minutes?

I thought not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,521
[WOLFC]
Members
3,200 posts
53 minutes ago, AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017 said:

100% of the time I don't know what they are doing.

I keep running into [edited] ones on my team.

I dunno. Give them -150 XP for every friendly BB sunk by enemy CVs.

 

I think that's fair.

What have you been drinking?

39 minutes ago, desmo_2 said:

:Smile_facepalm:

:Smile_great:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
616
[BOTO]
Members
1,475 posts
19,057 battles
1 hour ago, AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017 said:

100% of the time I don't know what they are doing.

I keep running into [edited] ones on my team.

I dunno. Give them -150 XP for every friendly BB sunk by enemy CVs.

 

I think that's fair.

Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
3,315 posts
26,945 battles
1 hour ago, AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017 said:

100% of the time I don't know what they are doing.

I keep running into [edited] ones on my team.

I dunno. Give them -150 XP for every friendly BB sunk by enemy CVs.

 

I think that's fair.

You may want to play monopoly instead ???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,826
[CLUMP]
Members
2,095 posts
2,429 battles
2 hours ago, AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017 said:

100% of the time I don't know what they are doing.

I keep running into [edited] ones on my team.

I dunno. Give them -150 XP for every friendly BB sunk by enemy CVs.

 

I think that's fair.

As people mention here before everyone should get an exp nerfed if they're not doing their job then :Smile_teethhappy:  Have to say this is some quality bait you have here :Smile_popcorn:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,400
[WPORT]
Members
11,635 posts
15,954 battles
2 hours ago, AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017 said:

100% of the time I don't know what they are doing.

I keep running into [edited] ones on my team.

I dunno. Give them -150 XP for every friendly BB sunk by enemy CVs.

 

I think that's fair.

I think you are going to experience "un-met expectations".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,279
[SIM]
Members
5,911 posts
9,432 battles

Motion to have your forum account suspended for being a whiny troll. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,299
[VCRUZ]
Members
4,049 posts
9,180 battles

As much as i hate CVs, you cant blame them for ships on your team being killed. Even if its the enemy CV killing ships on your team, there is not much the CV can do. One of the many things wrong with the CV rework is that WG reduced CV vs CV interactions. I. The old RTS CVs, they could use fighters to protect allied ships, the rework CVs only have a fighter consumable that is extremely "meh". 

 

The right thing to ask would be a skill based MM for CVs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
453
[YETI]
[YETI]
Members
638 posts
13,637 battles
3 hours ago, AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017 said:

100% of the time I don't know what they are doing.

I keep running into [edited] ones on my team.

I dunno. Give them -150 XP for every friendly BB sunk by enemy CVs.

 

I think that's fair.

Translation: I was in a BB and the other players on my team didn't do exactly what I wanted them to do and I died. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×