Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
ArIskandir

Where I stand in controversial issues (I´m bored edition)

49 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

3,473
[SALVO]
Members
7,077 posts
5,542 battles

I'm bored, I'm curious, I'm lost about where most of you stand, I'm not ashamed of who I am:

  • CV (in general): Pro
  • CV (rework): Cool with it
  • Subs: Pro (without stupid ping and homming torps)
  • MM hates me: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. As a cruel mistress loves and hates in equal measure
  • RNGesus: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. Believe it has a seed modifier for the match that can be adjusted. Don't have evidence, just speculation.
  • Buff/Nerf: Meh, don't care I'll play the damn ship anyway
  • MMM: Information is useful if you play competitive and look for an edge. Too lazy to install it with every update and not aiming to be competitive
  • FTP/P2W: Pretty mild elements, more oriented to Pay2Fun in my book
  • PvP/PvE: Enjoy both elements for what they are
  • Powercreep: Inevitable
  • Gimmicks: Mostly OK, better to try and fail than to get stagnant and fade
  • WG is after my money: Yeah of course, as everybody else 
  • My wallet is closed until (...): Hahaha you already paid sucker

 

Edit. Feel free to edit, post your own list and troll in any way you fancy

Edited by ArIskandir
  • Cool 5
  • Funny 5
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,473
[SALVO]
Members
7,077 posts
5,542 battles
2 minutes ago, _WaveRider_ said:

So why didn't you just say you like everything?

Why would I stick with a game I don't like?

And I'm full against stupid ping and homming torps for subs

Edited by ArIskandir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,473
[SALVO]
Members
7,077 posts
5,542 battles
1 minute ago, ITZ_ACE_BABY said:

classic cv are balanced, matchmaking and rng favours better players

 

 

Not. MM and RNG favours WG pocket, (bored time speculation) player skill has nothing to do with it.

CV is not balanced from a competitive perspective... but why in heavens you let WG convince you this is an e-sport when it is a fun navalesque rpg mmo?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,159
[USCC2]
Members
6,481 posts
10 minutes ago, ArIskandir said:

Why would I stick with a game I don't like?

And I'm full against stupid ping and homming torps for subs

So you like everything except the thing that is not yet in game :Smile_amazed:

Give it time, you'll probably end up liking them too :Smile_teethhappy:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34,541
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
25,207 posts
21,051 battles
24 minutes ago, ArIskandir said:

Why would I stick with a game I don't like?

Seems to be standard operating procedure for many whiners on this forum. Everything sucks, their favorite class is dead and nothing's good.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,473
[SALVO]
Members
7,077 posts
5,542 battles
13 minutes ago, _WaveRider_ said:

Give it time, you'll probably end up liking them too :Smile_teethhappy:

Hahahaha probably.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,106
[FOXEH]
Banned
14,364 posts
20,624 battles
8 minutes ago, Lert said:

Seems to be standard operating procedure for many whiners on this forum. Everything sucks, their favorite class is dead and nothing's good.

Actually, it's all good; it's just not all good for everybody!

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,433
[WOLF1]
Beta Testers
12,339 posts
17,511 battles
48 minutes ago, ArIskandir said:

I'm bored, I'm curious, I'm lost about where most of you stand, I'm not ashamed of who I am:

  • CV (in general): Pro
  • Pro as well
  • CV (rework): Cool with it
  • Coll with it also
  • Subs: Pro (without stupid ping and homming torps)
  • Also Pro in general
  • MM hates me: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. As a cruel mistress loves and hates in equal measure
  • I agree MM hates you but it likes me.
  • RNGesus: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. Believe it has a seed modifier for the match that can be adjusted. Don't have evidence, just speculation.
  • Don't buy it, same for everyone.
  • Buff/Nerf: Meh, don't care I'll play the damn ship anyway
  • Never ending always needed.
  • MMM: Information is useful if you play competitive and look for an edge. Too lazy to install it with every update and not aiming to be competitive
  • Yeah I do not care. Do not use, fine with me is other do.
  • FTP/P2W: Pretty mild elements, more oriented to Pay2Fun in my book
  • Yeah no issues. WG does this well.
  • PvP/PvE: Enjoy both elements for what they are
  • Agreed play what you like how you like
  • Powercreep: Inevitable
  • Agreed hence balance efforts never end
  • Gimmicks: Mostly OK, better to try and fail than to get stagnant and fade
  • I love Gimmicks variety is what keeps me playing
  • WG is after my money: Yeah of course, as everybody else 
  • WG has had a steady stream of my money since closed beta of WOT
  • My wallet is closed until (...): Hahaha you already paid sucker
  • My wallet is open until I decide it's not. I actually have a budget for this.

No Subs on your list?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,473
[SALVO]
Members
7,077 posts
5,542 battles
1 minute ago, paradat said:

No Subs on your list?

Yeah, up there in 3rd place. I'm pro-sub

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,433
[WOLF1]
Beta Testers
12,339 posts
17,511 battles
Just now, ArIskandir said:

Yeah, up there in 3rd place. I'm pro-sub

And I even responded... lol OK my Multi tasking skills are crap.

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,473
[SALVO]
Members
7,077 posts
5,542 battles
1 minute ago, paradat said:

And I even responded... lol OK my Multi tasking skills are crap.

 

No worries I get the same song from my wife every day

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
4,139 posts
44,199 battles
48 minutes ago, ArIskandir said:

I'm bored, I'm curious, I'm lost about where most of you stand, I'm not ashamed of who I am:

  • CV (in general): Pro
  • CV (rework): Cool with it
  • Subs: Pro (without stupid ping and homming torps)
  • MM hates me: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. As a cruel mistress loves and hates in equal measure
  • RNGesus: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. Believe it has a seed modifier for the match that can be adjusted. Don't have evidence, just speculation.
  • Buff/Nerf: Meh, don't care I'll play the damn ship anyway
  • MMM: Information is useful if you play competitive and look for an edge. Too lazy to install it with every update and not aiming to be competitive
  • FTP/P2W: Pretty mild elements, more oriented to Pay2Fun in my book
  • PvP/PvE: Enjoy both elements for what they are
  • Powercreep: Inevitable
  • Gimmicks: Mostly OK, better to try and fail than to get stagnant and fade
  • WG is after my money: Yeah of course, as everybody else 
  • My wallet is closed until (...): Hahaha you already paid sucker

Very well said. You forgot the groupies. But I won't elaborate as it has always put me in harm's way. Let's just say I am not looking to get noticed from here on out. No groupies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,664
[RLGN]
Members
15,680 posts
27,420 battles
10 minutes ago, Lert said:

Everything sucks,

No, just WG itself.

10 minutes ago, Lert said:

...their favorite class is dead,

Nah; I’m too much a generalist; but it’s true I’m not happy about carriers.

10 minutes ago, Lert said:

...and nothing's good.

If I were to say something was ‘good,’ it would be that ‘Dismount All,’ was finally implemented.

But then I would immediately turn around and ruthlessly and completely cynically remind everyone that it only took them five freaking years to do so.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,473
[SALVO]
Members
7,077 posts
5,542 battles
Just now, SteelRain_Rifleman said:

Very well said. You forgot the groupies. But I won't elaborate as it has always put me in harm's way. Let's just say I am not looking to get noticed from here on out. No groupies.

Groupies... is that an issue?  Sorry mate, not very familiar with that topic in here. Only groupies I know are rockstar's and most of the time are pretty hot so I guess I'm pro groupie too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
4,139 posts
44,199 battles
1 minute ago, Estimated_Prophet said:

No, just WG itself.

Nah; I’m too much a generalist; but it’s true I’m not happy about carriers.

If I were to say something was ‘good,’ it would be that ‘Dismount All,’ was finally implemented.

But then I would immediately turn around and ruthlessly and completely cynically remind everyone that it only took them five freaking years to do so.

Yes, 5 years. 5 years later..." New PR event. Lot's of fun, really. "

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34,541
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
25,207 posts
21,051 battles
1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • CV (in general): Pro
  • Meh. Can take 'em and leave 'em.
  • CV (rework): Cool with it
  • Not entirely successful, their effect on destroyers is a bit too much.
  • Subs: Pro (without stupid ping and homming torps)
  • Very, Very, VERY against
  • MM hates me: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. As a cruel mistress loves and hates in equal measure
  • BWAHAHAHAHAHA no
  • RNGesus: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. Believe it has a seed modifier for the match that can be adjusted. Don't have evidence, just speculation.
  • See above
  • Buff/Nerf: Meh, don't care I'll play the damn ship anyway
  • Agreed. Although I'd rather see balanced ships, everyone's idea of 'balance' and how to achieve it seems to be different. Plus there's national prejudice going on
  • MMM: Information is useful if you play competitive and look for an edge. Too lazy to install it with every update and not aiming to be competitive
  • Meh who cares. If you let numbers on a screen rule your game, just stop playing. It's a useful tool, but don't make it a reason to stop trying
  • FTP/P2W: Pretty mild elements, more oriented to Pay2Fun in my book
  • Agreed
  • PvP/PvE: Enjoy both elements for what they are
  • Agreed
  • Powercreep: Inevitable
  • Agreed
  • Gimmicks: Mostly OK, better to try and fail than to get stagnant and fade
  • Don't like some of them. WG seems to be grasping for straws how to set lines apart. I fear for what stupid gimmick WG is going to give a potential Dutch cruiser line
  • WG is after my money: Yeah of course, as everybody else 
  • ... Duh. In other news, sky is blue and grass is green
  • My wallet is closed until (...): Hahaha you already paid sucker
  • ... until the next interesting thing comes out that I consider worth my euros.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,894
[WOLF5]
Supertester
4,849 posts
4,285 battles
1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:

I'm bored, I'm curious, I'm lost about where most of you stand, I'm not ashamed of who I am:

  • CV (in general): Pro

As an idea, yup. As implemented, no way.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • CV (rework): Cool with it

Improvement, but also made them more popular which highlighted how broken they still are.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • Subs: Pro (without stupid ping and homming torps)

Agree, but I doubt we see them without those so right now against.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • MM hates me: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. As a cruel mistress loves and hates in equal measure

MM definitely hates me, but I don't think there's a quantifiable reason:Smile_teethhappy: I'm actually collecting the data now to see how uptiering/downtiering numbers play out.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • RNGesus: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. Believe it has a seed modifier for the match that can be adjusted. Don't have evidence, just speculation.

Nope, got to disagree. Just sacrifice enough chickens and it'll go better.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • Buff/Nerf: Meh, don't care I'll play the damn ship anyway

Yeah pretty much. Some times they break things, but usually they don't change much.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • MMM: Information is useful if you play competitive and look for an edge. Too lazy to install it with every update and not aiming to be competitive

Same. Can't be bothered, but don't care if you use it. Just please don't go on about all match, or quit because MMM says we're going to lose.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • FTP/P2W: Pretty mild elements, more oriented to Pay2Fun in my book

Yup.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • PvP/PvE: Enjoy both elements for what they are

Yup. Just don't whine about credit earning in Coop, WG knows it's crap, wants it to be crap, and nothing you say is going to change that. But I don't care what mode you play

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • Powercreep: Inevitable

Yup. Just some upkeep of older ships would be nice too.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • Gimmicks: Mostly OK, better to try and fail than to get stagnant and fade

With a couple exceptions, agree.

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • WG is after my money: Yeah of course, as everybody else 

Yeah, did you think they were a charity?

1 hour ago, ArIskandir said:
  • My wallet is closed until (...): Hahaha you already paid sucker

Exactly. And what's more you're still here so you clearly care to some extent, so probably you'll be shelling out on the next round of premiums.

 

One thing you forgot: What's your stance on Russian Bias?:Smile_trollface:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,048
[O_O]
[O_O]
Members
5,239 posts
22,861 battles
1 hour ago, Lert said:

Seems to be standard operating procedure for many whiners on this forum. Everything sucks, their favorite class is dead and nothing's good.

We used to say in the Corps that a happy Marine was a whining Marine. I think the same applies quite often in Wows.

If they truly don't care then why make a fuss?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34,541
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
25,207 posts
21,051 battles
3 minutes ago, Khafni said:

If they truly don't care then why make a fuss?

^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,571
[WOLF2]
Members
4,985 posts
20,952 battles
2 hours ago, ArIskandir said:

Why would I stick with a game I don't like?

And I'm full against stupid ping and homming torps for subs

Bring on the Subs with ping and homing torps!

You said you were bored and seem to want some controversy - There Ya Go :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SYN]
Members
1,420 posts
10,997 battles
2 hours ago, ITZ_ACE_BABY said:

classic cv are balanced, matchmaking and rng favours better players

 

 

<s>How is that fair?<s>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,080
[WORX]
Members
12,659 posts
19,907 battles
3 hours ago, ArIskandir said:

I'm bored, I'm curious, I'm lost about where most of you stand, I'm not ashamed of who I am:

  • CV (in general): Pro, same agreed
  • CV (rework): Cool with it Disappointed
  • Subs: Pro (without stupid ping and homming torps) I am for subs but not with current WG policy in place. They will mess it up again.
  • MM hates me: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. As a cruel mistress loves and hates in equal measure MM dont hate, in the majority of the cases, its players whom cant adjust to what random is. 
  • RNGesus: Not sold in the idea it is as innocent as WG claims it to be. Believe it has a seed modifier for the match that can be adjusted. Don't have evidence, just speculation. No such thing really, you have the biggest gun caliber in the tier VS armor you will over match. You will have great results... For EX; an OHIO vs any regular/light cruiser it faces... If that OHIO had NY capabilities, then it couldn't delete cruisers from a cap away.
  • Buff/Nerf: Meh, don't care I'll play the damn ship anyway When done correctly (WG haven't since 2018)... its a good tool to fend off power creep or help out ships with doing DMG in +2MM restriction. When done with an agenda, it can destroy the variety of the game. (127MM and below ships are useless against certain ships within the +2MM restriction) 
  • MMM: Information is useful if you play competitive and look for an edge. Too lazy to install it with every update and not aiming to be competitive MMM was made with good intentions However, its use has created a toxic gaming culture... Its use has contributed to loses because players who use MMM quite or exist to port from the start of a match.
  • FTP/P2W: Pretty mild elements, more oriented to Pay2Fun in my book Only applies to the increasing capabilities of high tier premiums, it has really over saturated the AP/HE spamming problem of high tiers
  • PvP/PvE: Enjoy both elements for what they are Same, Co-op as the learning center/kindergarten part of the game and Operations for being fun.
  • Powercreep: Inevitable Avoidable.. WG since 2018, have broken the rules, boundaries and limitations for each ship class, their in  class identity and their performance. This is getting to a point where some ships are labeled as say a cruiser but in reality its a BB (ala  an AK)
  • Gimmicks: Mostly OK, better to try and fail than to get stagnant and fade No comment, I like variety game play when its structured properly.
  • WG is after my money: Yeah of course, as everybody else DUH!
  • My wallet is closed until (...): Hahaha you already paid sucker WG have other money making avenues... You support WG;s NA branch when pay for an item... This activism is only to comfort the few, while others will gladly spend to support NA staff.

 

Edit. Feel free to edit, post your own list and troll in any way you fancy

Edited... Shared thoughts on the topics...

Edited by Navalpride33

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,473
[SALVO]
Members
7,077 posts
5,542 battles
40 minutes ago, Khafni said:

We used to say in the Corps that a happy Marine was a whining Marine. I think the same applies quite often in Wows.

If they truly don't care then why make a fuss?

Grognards... :cap_old:

58 minutes ago, AJTP89 said:

One thing you forgot: What's your stance on Russian Bias?:Smile_trollface:

hahaha right... well, I understand you like to pander to your core audience... I don't really care as long as the ships are interesting to play with and against. Anyway it is a good meme material and lols

40 minutes ago, Commander_367 said:

Bring on the Subs with ping and homing torps!

You said you were bored and seem to want some controversy - There Ya Go :)

:cap_tea: work in progress... there will be a time to cry havoc and let loose the dogs of war but it is not now. Worst case scenario, I can take another 3 year break. 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×